标准化降水指数SPI分布函数的适用性研究
Applicability of Standardized Precipitation Index with Alternative Distribution Functions
DOI: 10.12677/JWRR.2013.21006, PDF,  被引量    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 洪兴骏*, 郭生练*, 周研来*：武汉大学水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室
关键词: 干旱指标；SPI；Gamma分布；P-III分布；正态分布；比较研究；Drought Index; SPI; Gamma Distribution; Pearson Type III Distribution; Normal Distribution; Comparative Study
摘要: 标准化降水指数(SPI)是适用于多时间尺度的一种干旱指标，常采用Gamma分布进行拟合。以鄱阳湖流域13个气象站为研究对象，选择1961~2001年的逐月降水量为实验数据，采用三种分布函数，即Gamma分布、P-III分布、正态分布拟合了1，3，6，12，24月时间尺度下的时段累积降雨，以K-S方法检验了各分布的拟合效果，以Pearson相关系数和Nash效率系数为评价指标，比较分析了不同时间尺度下各分布计算的SPI值的差异，研究表明：P-III分布是用于拟合鄱阳湖流域各时段累积降雨量的最适宜分布函数；在12和24个月的时间尺度下，三种分布计算的SPI值差异很小，平均的相关系数均超过0.99，平均的Nash效率系数均超过98%，可以互相替代。
Abstract: Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) can be applied to multiple time-scales and Gamma distribution is suggested to compute SPI values. Based on the monthly precipitation data of 13 meteorological stations in the Poyang Lake basin from 1961 to 2001, three distribution functions (Gamma, Pearson Type Ⅲ and Normal) are adapted to fit long-term precipitation series on different time-scales of 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test is used to decide which distribution function could fit cumulative precipitation series better. The SPI values of different time scales are calculated by these three distribution functions and compared by using Pearson correlation coefficient and Nash efficiency coefficient. It is concluded that the Pearson Type Ⅲ distribution is the best for fitting precipitation data series. It is also found that for SPI values with 12 or 24-month cumulative precipitation data series, there is little difference between distribution functions, in which the average Pearson correlation coefficients and Nash efficiency coefficients are over 0.99 and 98%, respectively.
文章引用：洪兴骏, 郭生练, 周研来. 标准化降水指数SPI分布函数的适用性研究[J]. 水资源研究, 2013, 2(1): 33-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/JWRR.2013.21006

参考文献

[1] American Meteorological Society. Meteorological drought— Policy statement. Bulletin of American Meteorological Society, 1997, 78: 847-849.
[2] 袁文平, 周广胜. 干旱指标的理论分析与研究展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2004, 19(6): 982-991. YUAN Wenping, ZHOU Guangsheng. Theoratical study and research prospect on drought indices. Advance in Earth Science, 2004, 19(6): 982-991. (in Chinese)
[3] 王劲松, 郭江勇, 周跃武, 等. 干旱指标研究的进展与展望[J]. 干旱区地理, 2007, 30(1): 60-65. WANG Jinsong, GUO Jiangyong, ZHOU Yuewu, et al. Progress and prospect on drought indices research. Arid Land Geography, 2007, 30(1): 60-65. (in Chinese)
[4] MCKEE, T. B., DOESKEN, N. J. and KLIEST, J. The relation- ship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. Proceed- ing of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology, Boston: American Meteorological Society, 1993: 179-182.
[5] HAYES, M. J., SVOBODA, M. D., WILHITE, D. A., et al. Monitoring the 1996 drought using the standardized precipita- tion index. Bulletin of American Meteorological Society, 1999, 80: 429-438.
[6] GUTTAMN, N. B. Accepting the standardized precipitation index: A calculation algorithm. Journal of American Water Re- sources Association, 1999, 35(2): 311-322.
[7] LANA, X., BURGUENO, A. Some statistical characteristics of monthly and annual pluviometric irregularity for the Spanish Me- diterranean coast. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2000, 65: 79-97.
[8] VICENTE-SERRANO, S. M. Differences in spatial patterns of drought on different time scales: an analysis of the Iberian Pen- insula. Water Resources Management, 2006, 20: 37-60.
[9] ANGELIDIS, P., MARIS, F., KOTSOVINOS, N., et al. Compu- tation of drought index SPI with alternative distribution func- tions. Water Resources Management, 2012, 26: 2453-2473.