员工派系对个体创新的影响研究
Research on the Effect of Employee Factions on Individual Innovation
DOI: 10.12677/orf.2024.145461, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 秦佳良, 戴 姿, 李朗朗, 程子旭：上海理工大学管理学院，上海
关键词: 工具性关系；情感性关系；派系；个体创新；Instrumental Relationship； Affective Relationship； Factions； Individual Innovation
摘要: 本文在组织网络和创新理论的基础上，从工具性关系和情感性关系的角度出发，探讨了员工关系结构(派系)对个体创新的影响。通过收集上海高新技术企业技术人员(或研发人员)的问卷调查数据来进行实证研究，研究结果表明：员工工具性(知识共享)派系与个体创新呈正相关；员工情感性(友谊)派系与个体创新呈正相关；但是，当员工个体同时横跨知识共享派系和友谊派系时，其创新绩效会下降。本文对员工派系选择以及企业从员工关系管理来激发个体创新有一定的理论指导和实践意义。
Abstract: This paper studies the effects of relationship structure (factions) on individual innovation based on the theory of organizational networks and innovation from the perspective of instrumental relationship and affective relationship. The empirical result of questionnaire data from technical staffs (R&D staffs) of Shanghai high-tech companies shows that both instrumental (knowledge-sharing) factions and affective (friendship) factions are positively related to individual innovation. However, the paper also indicates that when individuals stretch across knowledge-sharing and friendship factions, their innovative performance reduces. This study can be used as a reference for the employee’s faction choice and employee’s relationship management of a company to improve individual innovation.
文章引用：秦佳良, 戴姿, 李朗朗, 程子旭. 员工派系对个体创新的影响研究[J]. 运筹与模糊学, 2024, 14(5): 180-192. https://doi.org/10.12677/orf.2024.145461

参考文献

[1] Grigoriou, K. and Rothaermel, F.T. (2016) Organizing for Knowledge Generation: Internal Knowledge Networks and the Contingent Effect of External Knowledge Sourcing. Strategic Management Journal, 38, 395-414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] Sosa, M.E. (2011) Where Do Creative Interactions Come From? The Role of Tie Content and Social Networks. Organization Science, 22, 1-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] Kilduff, M. and Brass, D.J. (2010) Organizational Social Network Research: Core Ideas and Key Debates. Academy of Management Annals, 4, 317-357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[4] Perry-Smith, J.E. and Mannucci, P.V. (2017) From Creativity to Innovation: The Social Network Drivers of the Four Phases of the Idea Journey. Academy of Management Review, 42, 53-79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] Podolny, J.M. and Baron, J.N. (1997) Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace. American Sociological Review, 62, 673-693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Plickert, G., Côté, R.R. and Wellman, B. (2007) It’s Not Who You Know, It’s How You Know Them: Who Exchanges What with Whom? Social Networks, 29, 405-429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] 潘安成, 刘爽. 社会性偷闲能“偷出”团队创造力吗?——一个案例的探索性研究[J]. 管理世界, 2013(8): 154-166.
[8] 张闯, 杜楠. 网络层面的组织间网络: 整体网络实证文献综述[J]. 管理世界, 2011(10): 154-167.
[9] Krackhardt, D. (1999) The Ties that Torture: Simmelian Tie Analysis in Organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 16, 183-210.
https://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/krack/documents/pubs/1999/1999%20The%20Ties%20that%20Torture.pdf
[10] Levin, D.Z. and Cross, R. (2004) The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer. Management Science, 50, 1477-1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Battilana, J. and Casciaro, T. (2013) Overcoming Resistance to Organizational Change: Strong Ties and Affective Cooptation. Management Science, 59, 819-836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] 胡玮玮, 丁一志, 罗佳, 王星勇, 朱紫蓝. 个性化契约、组织自尊与知识共享行为研究[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(4): 134-143.
[13] Hayton, J.C. and Cholakova, M. (2012) The Role of Affect in the Creation and Intentional Pursuit of Entrepreneurial Ideas. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 41-67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] Burt, R.S. (2015) Reinforced Structural Holes. Social Networks, 43, 149-161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] 盛亚, 李玮. 强弱齐美尔连接对企业技术创新的影响研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2012, 30(2): 301-311.
[16] Tortoriello, M. (2014) The Social Underpinnings of Absorptive Capacity: The Moderating Effects of Structural Holes on Innovation Generation Based on External Knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 586-597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[17] 赵炎, 韩笑, 栗铮. 派系及联络企业的创新能力评价[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(1): 61-75.
[18] 张巍, 任浩. Simmelian联系与个体创新: 知识分享意愿和共同知识基础的中介作用[J]. 管理科学, 2012, 25(6): 55-64.
[19] 张巍, 任浩, 曲怡颖. 从创意到创新: 公平感知与齐美尔联结的作用[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(11): 1621-1633.
[20] Reagans, R., Singh, P.V. and Krishnan, R. (2015) Forgotten Third Parties: Analyzing the Contingent Association between Unshared Third Parties, Knowledge Overlap, and Knowledge Transfer Relationships with Outsiders. Organization Science, 26, 1400-1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[21] McEvily, B., Soda, G. and Tortoriello, M. (2014) More Formally: Rediscovering the Missing Link between Formal Organization and Informal Social Structure. Academy of Management Annals, 8, 299-345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[22] Whittington, K.B. and Smith-Doerr, L. (2008) Women Inventors in Context. Gender & Society, 22, 194-218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[23] Tortoriello, M. and Krackhardt, D. (2010) Activating Cross-Boundary Knowledge: The Role of Simmelian Ties in the Generation of Innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 167-181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[24] Rhee, L. and Leonardi, P.M. (2018) Which Pathway to Good Ideas? An Attention-Based View of Innovation in Social Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 1188-1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[25] Clement, J., Shipilov, A. and Galunic, C. (2017) Brokerage as a Public Good: The Externalities of Network Hubs for Different Formal Roles in Creative Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63, 251-286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐