配施土壤调理剂对烤烟生长发育的影响
Effects of Applying Soil Conditioner on the Growth and Development of Flue-Cured Tobacco
DOI: 10.12677/hjas.2024.1410135, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 田临卿, 焦 健, 李志刚, 徐 俊, 赵 鉴:云南省烟草公司昆明市公司宜良分公司,云南 昆明;刘文婧, 段雅婷, 李玲焕, 周桂夙*:云南农业大学烟草学院,云南 昆明
关键词: 烤烟土壤调理剂农艺性状化学成分经济性状Flue-Cured Tobacco Soil Conditioner Agronomic Character Chemical Composition Economic Character
摘要: 本试验以红花大金元为试验对象,通过随机田间小区试验,分析当地常规施肥、当地常规施肥 + 土壤调理剂、当地常规施肥减氮10% + 土壤调理剂3种施肥模式对烤烟农艺性状、病害发生、初烤烟叶(C3F)化学品质、经济性状的影响。试验结果表明,在烟株生育中后期,当地常规施肥 + 土壤调理剂处理、当地常规施肥减氮10% + 土壤调理剂处理对烟株主要农艺性状的促进作用优于当地常规施肥处理。在对烟株赤星病的调查中,以当地常规施肥减氮10% + 土壤调理剂处理的病害严重程度最低。在对烟株养分吸收的测定分析结果中得出,以当地常规施肥减氮10% + 土壤调理剂处理对养分吸收的促进效果最好。在对初烤烟叶(C3F)化学品质的分析中得出,不同施肥处理对其均有不同程度的影响,但各处理间差异不显著,总体以当地常规施肥减氮10% + 土壤调理剂处理的表现较好。在经济性状中,添加土壤调理剂的处理总体要优于常规施肥处理,其中在产量、产值以当地常规施肥减氮10% + 土壤调理剂处理的表现较好,产量分别比常规施肥处理和常规施肥处理 + 土壤调理剂高29.28%、25.68%,产值分别高28.44%、11.55%。综上所述,在当地常规施肥减氮10%基础上配合施用土壤调理剂的效果最佳。
Abstract: In this experiment, Honghua Dajinyuan tobacco was used as the test subject. A randomized field plot experiment was conducted to analyze the effects of three fertilization modes—local conventional fertilization, local conventional fertilization plus soil conditioners, and local conventional fertilization with a 10% reduction in nitrogen plus soil conditioners—on the agronomic traits, disease incidence, chemical quality of initial cured tobacco leaves (C3F), and economic traits of flue-cured tobacco. The results showed that, in the mid to late growth stages of tobacco plants, both the local conventional fertilization plus soil conditioners treatment and the local conventional fertilization with a 10% reduction in nitrogen plus soil conditioners treatment had a more significant positive effect on the main agronomic traits of the tobacco plants compared to the local conventional fertilization treatment. The severity of brown spot (Alternaria alternata) was lowest in the local conventional fertilization with a 10% reduction in nitrogen plus soil conditioners treatment. The nutrient absorption analysis results indicated that the local conventional fertilization with a 10% reduction in nitrogen plus soil conditioners treatment had the best effect on promoting nutrient uptake. In the chemical quality analysis of the initial cured tobacco leaves (C3F), it was found that the different fertilization treatments had varying degrees of impact, but the differences between the treatments were not significant. Overall, the local conventional fertilization with a 10% reduction in nitrogen plus soil conditioners treatment performed the best. In terms of economic traits, treatments with soil conditioners generally outperformed the conventional fertilization treatment. Specifically, the local conventional fertilization with a 10% reduction in nitrogen plus soil conditioners treatment showed better performance in yield and value, with yields 29.28% and 25.68% higher and economic values 28.44% and 11.55% higher than the conventional fertilization treatment and the conventional fertilization plus soil conditioners treatment, respectively. In conclusion, the best results were achieved with the local conventional fertilization with a 10% reduction in nitrogen combined with soil conditioners.
文章引用:田临卿, 刘文婧, 段雅婷, 焦健, 李玲焕, 李志刚, 徐俊, 赵鉴, 周桂夙. 配施土壤调理剂对烤烟生长发育的影响[J]. 农业科学, 2024, 14(10): 1074-1082. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjas.2024.1410135

参考文献

[1] 赖佳鑫, 邓华, 刘峰, 等. 化肥减施配施有机肥对烤烟产质量和化学成分的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(6): 73-78.
[2] 张恒, 曹廷茂, 朱经伟, 等. 长期不同施肥方式对植烟土壤性状与烤烟产质量的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2023, 51(10): 39-47.
[3] 郑承昭, 郭凯君, 魏建秀. 有机肥对烤烟土壤和产质的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2013, 41(11): 4794-4796.
[4] 刘艳霞, 付生华, 李想, 等. 化肥连续施用条件下植烟土壤微生物群落响应特征[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2022, 28(6): 104-114.
[5] 乔清华, 黄瑞基, 盛福瑞, 等. 不同土壤改良剂对酸化土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2023(2): 62-72.
[6] 张广雨, 胡志明, 褚德朋, 等. 生物炭对根际土壤微生态的调控及对烟草青枯病的防控作用[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2020, 26(6): 81-88.
[7] 罗俊, 林兆里, 李诗燕, 等. 不同土壤改良措施对机械压实酸化蔗地土壤理化性质及微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(4): 596-613.
[8] 陈诚, 张小川, 蔡小扬, 等. 土壤改良施肥对白菜根际微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2018(13): 108-113.
[9] 杨明明. 不同土壤改良剂对农田土壤结构与养分含量影响的研究与评价[J]. 农家科技, 2024(9): 152-154.
[10] 耿士均, 刘刊, 商海燕, 等. 专用微生物肥对不同连作障碍强度土壤上番茄生长的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2012, 51(22): 5008-5011, 5033.
[11] 李杰, 徐兴阳, 杨树明, 等. 昆明市植烟土壤养分时空变异特征及其适宜性评价[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(2): 424-434.
[12] 邓道江, 朱洪宝. 烤烟种植大田管理技术[J]. 农家科技(上旬刊), 2022(9): 19-21.
[13] 国家烟草专卖局. YC/T142-1988, 中华人民共和国烟草行业标准, 烟草农艺性状调查方法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1998.
[14] 全国烟草标准化技术委员会. 烟草病害分级及调查方法YC/T39-1996 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2002.
[15] 杜彩艳, 吴迪, 周文兵, 等. 施氮水平对抚仙湖流域植烟区烤烟产质量及氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(6): 197-205.
[16] YC/T201.1-2006, 中华人民共和国烟草行业标准, 烟叶分类与代码[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2006.
[17] 吴兴富, 宋春满, 邓建华. 云南烟区烤烟糖含量特点[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 36(3): 12-14.
[18] 韩富根. 烟草化学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2010: 102-118.
[19] 史宏志, 刘国顺. 烟草香味学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1998: 179-180.
[20] 李欣燕, 邵志晖, 王方玲, 王俊, 阳苇丽, 赵铭钦. 保水剂对干旱胁迫下雪茄烟叶次生代谢物质及化学成分含量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2023(5): 215-224.
[21] 陈江华, 刘建利, 龙怀玉. 中国烟叶矿质营养及主要化学成分含量特征研究[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2004, 10(5): 20-27.
[22] 朱立军, 尚军, 等. 国内外不同卷烟糖碱比、糖氮比、氮碱比的差异分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2010(10): 43-45, 50.
[23] 陆国勇, 屈杰, 王守旗, 等. 土壤改良剂对烤烟生长发育及烟叶产质量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(9): 32-36.
[24] 李迪秦, 任铮, 祝利, 等. 土壤调理剂与枯草芽孢杆菌菌剂配施对烟草生长发育及病害的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(10): 88-94.
[25] 王成己, 李静超, 郝东, 等. 化肥减量配施炭基有机肥对烤烟翠碧1号生长及产质量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2023, 37(11): 2288-2296.
[26] 黄隆. 不同施肥处理对烤烟翠碧一号生长发育与产质量的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2019.