生育支持政策国际启示研究
International Insights on Fertility Support Policies
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2024.1310902, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 何 樾, 张翊廷:西南民族大学公共管理学院,四川 成都
关键词: 生育支持政策低生育率国际启示研究Fertility Supportpolicies Low Fertility Rates International Insights Research
摘要: 面对全球人口老龄化和生育率下降的挑战,优化生育政策对于促进人口长期均衡发展具有重要意义。本研究旨在通过国际经验分析,探讨不同国家的生育支持政策,为中国应对人口负增长和低生育率问题提供政策借鉴和优化建议。采用文献研究的方法,系统梳理了瑞典、日本和美国的生育支持政策。通过分析瑞典、日本和美国生育支持政策的覆盖面、支持力度、服务支持体系、假期支持政策和政策协同等方面,深入分析其效果和可借鉴之处。根据对三国生育支持政策及效果分析得出研究结论:生育政策覆盖不足,生育支持力度有限,服务体系不健全,假期支持政策不完善,生育政策缺乏协同推进;结合我国国情提出我国生育支持政策发展建议:扩大生育支持政策的覆盖面,确保更多低收入家庭受益,通过经济支持和补贴机制,激发生育意愿。提高生育津贴和育儿补贴标准,建立与家庭收入、子女数量等因素相挂钩的差异化补贴机制,满足家庭的实际经济需求。建立健全的托育服务体系,鼓励社会力量参与,提供多元化、多层次的托育服务,减轻家庭育儿负担。延长产假和育儿假时长,引入灵活休假制度,允许职工根据自身情况调整休假时间,平衡工作与家庭需求。加强生育支持政策与其他社会保障政策的协同配合,形成政策合力,促进家庭和谐稳定。
Abstract: Facing the global challenges of population aging and declining birth rates, optimizing fertility policies is of great significance for promoting the long-term balanced development of the population. This study aims to explore fertility support policies in different countries through international experience analysis, and to provide policy references and optimization suggestions for China to address the issues of negative population growth and low fertility rates. The study adopts a literature research method to systematically review the fertility support policies in Sweden, Japan, and the United States. By analyzing the coverage, support intensity, service support system, holiday support policies, and policy coordination of the fertility support policies in Sweden, Japan, and the United States, the study delves into their effectiveness and points of reference. Based on the analysis of the fertility support policies and their effects in the three countries, the research concludes that fertility policies have insufficient coverage, limited support intensity, an inadequate service system, imperfect holiday support policies, and lack of collaborative promotion. In light of China’s national conditions, the study proposes development suggestions for China’s fertility support policies: expanding the coverage of fertility support policies to ensure more low-income families benefit, stimulating the desire to have children through economic support and subsidy mechanisms. Raise the standards of childbirth allowances and parenting subsidies, and establish a differentiated subsidy mechanism linked to factors such as family income and the number of children to meet the actual economic needs of families. Establish a robust childcare service system, encourage social participation, and provide diversified and multi-level childcare services to alleviate the burden of family childcare. Extend the duration of maternity and parenting leave, introduce a flexible leave system, and allow employees to adjust their leave time according to their own needs, balancing work and family needs. Strengthen the coordination of fertility support policies with other social security policies to form a policy synergy and promote family harmony and stability.
文章引用:何樾, 张翊廷. 生育支持政策国际启示研究[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2024, 13(10): 120-128. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2024.1310902

参考文献

[1] 米瑞华, 刘玉. 日本生育支持政策及其对我国的启示[J]. 延安大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 46(2): 66-73.
[2] 郑基超, 严雷. 支持生育的家庭政策何以有效——基于法国和日本经验的研究[J]. 山东女子学院学报, 2024(2): 1-14.
[3] 李波平. 低生育率国家支持生育的家庭福利政策及其对中国的启示[J]. 湖北行政学院学报, 2023(1): 78-84.
[4] 张伯玉. 日本实施促进生育政策的得与失[J]. 人民论坛, 2022(17): 78-81.
[5] 陈梅, 张梦皙, 石智雷. 国 外生育支持理论与实践研究进展[J]. 人口学刊, 2021, 43(6): 54-67.
[6] 贺丹. 实施好三孩生育政策重在加强配套支持措施[J]. 人口与健康, 2021(6): 6-7.
[7] 贺丹. 完善生育支持政策构建家庭友好社会[J]. 人口与健康, 2020(10): 6-7.
[8] 牛姗, 曹丽娜. 日本、韩国、新加坡、中国台湾生育率比较分析[J]. 统计与理, 2020, 35(10): 103-109.
[9] DeCicca, P. and Krashinsky, H. (2020) Does Education Reduce Teen Fertility? Evidence from Compulsory Schooling Laws. Journal of Health Economics, 69, Article 102268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] 吕红平, 邹超. 实施“全面两孩”后家庭支持政策改革与完善研究[J]. 人口与发展, 2018, 24(2): 71-78.
[11] Andersen, S.H. and Özcan, B. (2021) The Effects of Unemployment on Fertility. Advances in Life Course Research, 49, Article 100401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] 杨菊华, 杜声红. 部分国家生育支持政策及其对中国的启示[J]. 探索, 2017(2): 137-146.
[13] 杨云彦. 构建鼓励生育的社会支持体系[J]. 中国卫生, 2017(4): 47-48.
[14] Nakajima, R. and Tanaka, R. (2014) Estimating the Effects of Pronatal Policies on Residential Choice and Fertility. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 34, 179-200.
[15] Slonimczyk, F. and Yurko, A. (2014) Assessing the Impact of the Maternity Capital Policy in Russia. Labour Economics, 30, 265-281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 何文炯, 杨一心, 王璐莎, 等. 中国生育保障制度改革研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2014, 44(4): 5-18.
[17] 潘锦棠. 生育保障全覆盖的两种设想[J]. 中国社会保障, 2010(8): 20-21.
[18] van Groezen, B., Leers, T. and Meijdam, L. (2003) Social Security and Endogenous Fertility: Pensions and Child Allowances as Siamese Twins. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 233-251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef