浅析国际投资仲裁下东道国的反请求权

Brief Analysis of the Counter-Request Right of the Host Country under International Investment Arbitration

摘要: 随着社会经济的发展，经济出现跨国化、多样化的特征。国家通过给予外商各种优惠待遇从而吸引外商来本国内进行投资。投资过程中的争议需要争端解决机制处理。投资者–国家争端解决机制(Investor-State Dispute Settlement, ISDS)则为其中的一种。然而仲裁庭在审理案件与裁决中多偏向于投资者，多个国家纷纷开始考虑退出ISDS机制。因此笔者旨在通过分析ISDS机制中东道国的反请求权，从而平衡ISDS机制中东道国与投资者的地位。以便东道国能有效地应对投资者可能提起的国际投资争端解决案件。

Abstract: With the development of society and economy, the economy has the characteristics of transnationalisation and diversification. The state attracts foreign investors to invest in their own country by giving various preferential treatment to foreign investors. Disputes in the investment process need to be handled by a dispute settlement mechanism. The Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) is one of them. However, arbitral tribunals are mostly biased towards investors in hearing cases and rulings, and many countries have begun to consider withdrawing from the ISDS mechanism. Therefore, the author aims to balance the status of ISDS mechanism and investors by analyzing the counter-request right of the ISDS mechanism. So that the host country can effectively respond to international investment dispute settlement cases that investors may file.