基于复杂工程问题解决能力培养的课程创新——以水质工程学为例
Curriculum Innovation Based on the Cultivation of Complex Engineering Problem Solving Abilities—Taking Water Quality Engineering as an Example
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2024.1311984, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 周赛军, 邓仁健, 侯保林, 彭亚洲, 王 闯:湖南科技大学土木工程学院,湖南 湘潭;苏 畅:湖南省桃江县第四中学,湖南 益阳
关键词: 水质工程学复杂工程问题给排水科学与工程工程思维Water Quality Engineering Complex Engineering Problems Water Supply and Drainage Science and Engineering Engineering Thinking
摘要: 在传统教学模式下,“水质工程学”课程在培养学生解决复杂工程问题的能力方面存在一定的局限性,我们对“水质工程学”课程进行了以工程思维为核心的教学改革。通过引入翻转课堂的教学策略,我们构建了一种融合“大班授课(课堂教学) + 小组项目研讨 + 综合性考核”的新型教学模式。此外,我们还结合了“净水厂设计”和“污水处理厂设计”等实践环节,进一步扩展了专业知识的应用,并加强了学生的工程思维训练。这种多环节的培养模式专为我校给排水科学与工程专业的技术人才培养量身定制,旨在全面提升学生的专业技能和工程实践能力。改革实施后,我们发现学生的毕业要求达成度在解决复杂工程问题方面有了显著提高,这不仅满足了工程教育评估(认证)对专业核心课程持续改进的需求,也证明了我们的教学改革方案是科学合理的。
Abstract: In the traditional teaching model, the “Water Quality Engineering” course has certain limitations in cultivating students’ ability to solve complex engineering problems. To address this deficiency, we have carried out a teaching reform of the “Water Quality Engineering” course with an emphasis on engineering thinking. By introducing the flipped classroom teaching strategy, we have established a new teaching model that integrates “large class lectures (classroom teaching) + small group project discussions + comprehensive assessments.” Additionally, we have combined practical segments such as “Water Purification Plant Design” and “Wastewater Treatment Plant Design” to further expand the application of professional knowledge and strengthen students’ engineering thinking training. This multi-stage training model is tailored specifically for the technical talent training of our university’s Water Supply and Drainage Science and Engineering major, aiming to comprehensively enhance students’ professional skills and engineering practice abilities. After the implementation of the reform, we found that the students’ achievement level in solving complex engineering problems has significantly improved, which not only meets the continuous improvement requirements of professional core courses under engineering education evaluation (accreditation), but also proves that our teaching reform plan is scientifically sound and reasonable.
文章引用:周赛军, 苏畅, 邓仁健, 侯保林, 彭亚洲, 王闯. 基于复杂工程问题解决能力培养的课程创新——以水质工程学为例[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2024, 13(11): 54-60. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2024.1311984

参考文献

[1] 中国工程教育专业认证协会. 工程教育认证通用标准解读及使用指南(2022)版[EB/OL]. 中国工程教育专业认证协会网站.
https://www.ceeaa.org.cn/gcjyzyrzxh/xwdt/tzgg56/631560/index.html, 2024-10-27.
[2] 李圭白, 张杰. 水质工程学[M]. 第3版. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2021.
[3] 夏建国. 从三个国际教育协定看工程教育与技术教育的区别与联系[J]. 中国高等教育, 2020(2): 39-41.
[4] 林健. 如何理解和解决复杂工程问题——基于《华盛顿协议》的界定和要求[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2016(5): 17-26, 38.
[5] 夏博, 李春杨, 曾海峰, 魏敏, 万露露. 基于翻转课堂模式的先进制造技术课程思政教学改革与实践[J]. 高教学刊, 2024(26): 168-171.
[6] 李绍秀, 王志红, 杜星, 秦雯. 基于OBE理念的教学持续改进实践——以“水质工程学”课程为例[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2023(36): 152-155.
[7] 秦雯, 宋阳, 杜星. 面向工程教育专业认证的“水质工程学”课程改革——以强化支撑“解决复杂工程问题”的持续性改进为例[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2024(5): 81-84.