文章引用说明 更多>> (返回到该文章)

Zimbardo, P. G. (1971). The Power and Pathology of Imprisonment. Congressional Record, 15, 10-25.

被以下文章引用:

  • 标题: 追随力研究述评与展望The Research Review and Prospect of Followership

    作者: 赵宇, 刘飞, 陈英葵

    关键字: 追随力, 追随者, 研究述评, 追随动机, 追随特质Followership, Follower, Research Review, Follower Motivation, Follower Characteristics

    期刊名称: 《Advances in Psychology》, Vol.6 No.5, 2016-05-30

    摘要: 随着追随力概念的提出,学术界逐渐将研究重心从领导力转向了追随力。有关追随力的研究国外学者起步较早,国内仍处于初级阶段,就其概念和维度,学者们基于不同层面提出了不同的观点,但尚未达成一致。通过对国内外相关文献的梳理,结果发现:1) 追随力的概念仍缺少具有权威性的界定,理论基础相对薄弱,应对其概念作出清晰且权威的界定;2) 追随力研究应逐步从理论研究过渡到实证研究;3) 学者们应致力于追随力量表的开发和完善,以推动实证研究的发展;4) 对内隐追随力的测量考虑采用多视角、间接测量法进行研究;5) 应采用“动”“静”结合的整合视角考察追随力在组织中的作用。 With the mention of the followership, academic circles gradually turn the focus from leadership to followership. The study of the followership started earlier in abroad, it’s still in the primary stage in domestic. Scholars put forward different views based on different layers when involving the concept and dimensions, but a consensus has not yet reached. By combing the relevant literature published on domestic and foreign countries, the result shows: 1) The concept of followership is still lack of authoritative definition and relatively weak in the theoretical basis, so we need to define its concept more clearly and authoritatively; 2) The study of followership should be gradually changed from theoretical research to empirical research; 3) To promote the development of empirical research, scholars should be committed to the development and improvement of the scale of followership; 4) Implicit followership should be measured from multiple perspectives by indirect method; 5) The way of “dynamic” and “static” should be combined to explore the effect of followership in the organization.

在线客服:
对外合作:
联系方式:400-6379-560
投诉建议:feedback@hanspub.org
客服号

人工客服,优惠资讯,稿件咨询
公众号

科技前沿与学术知识分享