文章引用说明 更多>> (返回到该文章)

胡军华, 张庆波, 鲍雷鸣 (2006) SPSS统计软件在水文预报中的应用. 西北水电, 2, 3-5.

被以下文章引用:

  • 标题: 青城山与峨眉山遗产旅游发展的对比研究A Comparative Study on Heritage Tourism Development in Mount Qingcheng and Mount Emei

    作者: 袁宁, 孙克勤

    关键字: 青城山, 峨眉山, 对比研究, 对策Mount Qingcheng; Mount Emei; Comparative Study; Countermeasures

    期刊名称: 《Sustainable Development》, Vol.4 No.1, 2014-01-06

    摘要: 世界遗产地青城山与峨眉山分别拥有独具特色的道教旅游资源和佛教旅游资源,并具备得天独厚的自然条件。本文以青城山与峨眉山为研究对象,对两者的遗产旅游发展状况进行对比研究。研究的主要方面包括遗产旅游资源、气候因素、旅游设施条件与服务水平以及旅游业发展趋势等。比较遗产旅游发展条件可知两者都具有高品位的遗产旅游资源,但旅游设施条件与服务水平有待提高;运用ARIMA模型得到两者旅游业发展趋势,得出青城山的旅游业发展水平逊于峨眉山。在此基础上,本文针对两者存在的异同,提出了一些可行对策,以期进一步提升青城山与峨眉山的遗产旅游发展水平。Mount Qingcheng and Mount Emei of World Heritage sites have distinctive Taoism tourism resources or Buddhist tourism resources. And both of them are unique in natural conditions. This paper takes Mount Qingcheng and Mount Emei as the study area, and discusses the similarities and differences of heritage tourism between the two sites. The aspects discussed in the paper include heritage tourism resources, climate factors, tourist facilities and service level, the trend prediction of tourism, etc. By comparing the heritage tourism conditions of the two, it shows that both of them have high-grade heritage tourism resources, but the tourist facilities and service level need improvement; by comparing the trend prediction of tourism development of the two using ARIMA model, conclusions can be drawn that the tourism development level of Mount Qingcheng is lower than that of Mount Emei. On this foundation, the research puts forward feasible countermeasures to solve existing problems and further improve the heritage tourism development level of the two site

在线客服:
对外合作:
联系方式:400-6379-560
投诉建议:feedback@hanspub.org
客服号

人工客服,优惠资讯,稿件咨询
公众号

科技前沿与学术知识分享