撤稿:具身模拟假设——意义研究新进展
Embodied Simulation Hypothesis—Advances in the Study of Meaning
DOI: 10.12677/ML.2019.73033, PDF, HTML, 下载: 787  浏览: 1,904 
作者: 刘建稳:武汉轻工大学,湖北 武汉;湖南大学,湖南 长沙
关键词: 意义具身模拟新进展Meaning Embodiment Simulation Advances
摘要:

撤稿声明:“ 具身模拟假设——意义研究新进展”一文刊登在2019年6月出版的《现代语言学》2019年第7卷第3期第245-251页上。文章还有待进一步完善,因此作者主动申请撤稿。根据国际出版流程,编委会现决定撤除此稿件,保留原出版出处:刘建稳. 具身模拟假设——意义研究新进展[J]. 现代语言学, 2019, 7(3): 245-251.

https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2019.73033

并对此撤稿带来的不便致以歉意。

Abstract:

文章引用:刘建稳. 撤稿:具身模拟假设——意义研究新进展[J]. 现代语言学, 2019, 7(3): 245-251. https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2019.73033

参考文献

[1] Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors We Live by. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[2] Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999) Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books, New York.
[3] Langacker, R. (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume 1. Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
[4] Damasio, A. (1994/2005). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. Penguin Books, New York.
[5] Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V. and Fogassi, L. (1996) Premotor Cortex and the Recognition of Motor Actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131-141.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0
[6] Bergen, B. (2012) Louder than Words: The New Science of How the Mind Makes Meaning. Basic Books, New York.
[7] Lakoff, G. (2014) Mapping the Brain’s Metaphor Circuitry: Metaphorical Thought in Everyday Reason. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 958.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958
[8] 刘正光. 认知语言学的哲学观: 认知无意识、体验心智与隐喻思维[J].湖南大学学报, 2003, 17(3): 75-80.
[9] Jackendoff, R. (2003) Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X03000153
[10] Bergen, B. (2016) Embodiment, Simulation and Meaning. In: Riemer, N., Ed., The Routledge Handbook of Semantics, Routledge, Abingdon, 142-157.
[11] Gibbs, R. (2005) Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805844
[12] Chrysikou, E., Casasanto, D. and Thompson-Schill, S. (2017) Motor Experience Influences Object Knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146, 395-408.
https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000269
[13] Gallese, V. and Goldman, A. (1998) Mirror Neurons and the Simulation Theory of Mind-Reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 493-501.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01262-5
[14] 叶浩生. 镜像神经元: 认知具身性的神经生物学证据[J]. 心理学探新, 2012, 32(1): 3-7.
[15] Gallese, V. (2003) The Manifold Nature of Interpersonal Relations: The Quest for a Common Mechanism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 358, 517-528.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1234
[16] Zarr, N., Ferguson, R. and Glenberg, A. (2013) Language Comprehension Warps the Mirror Neuron System. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 870.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00870
[17] 李子健, 张积家, 乔艳阳. 具身理论分歧: 概念隐喻与知觉符号观[J]. 科学技术哲学研究, 2018(2): 45-51.
[18] Casasanto, D. (2011) Different Bodies, Different Minds: The Body Specificity of Language and Thought. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 378-383.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411422058
[19] Casasanto, D. (2014) Bodily Relativity. In: Shapiro, L., Ed., Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition, Routledge, New York, 108-117.
[20] Casasanto, D. (2017) Relationships between Language and Cognition. In: Dancygier, B., Ed., Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 19-37.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339732.003
[21] Casasanto, D. and Jasmin, K. (2010) Good and Bad in the Hands of Politicians: Spontaneous Gestures during Positive and Negative Speech. PLoS ONE, 5, e11805.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011805
[22] Brookshire, G. and Casasanto, D. (2018) Approach Motivation in Human Cerebral Cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 373, pii: 20170141.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0141
[23] Saj, A., Fuhrman, O., Vuilleumier, P. and Boroditsky, L. (2014) Patients with Left Spatial Neglect Also Neglect the “Left Side” of Time. Psychological Science, 25, 207-214.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612475222
[24] Gibbs, R. (2006) Metaphor Interpretation as Embodied Simulation. Mind and Language, 21, 434-458.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00285.x
[25] Boroditsky, L. and Gaby, A. (2010) Remembrances of Times East: Absolute Spatial Representations of Time in an Australian Aboriginal Community. Psychological Science, 2, 1635-1639.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610386621
[26] Majid, A., Gaby, A. and Boroditsky, L. (2013) Time in Terms of Space. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 554.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00554
[27] Gijssels, T. and Casasanto, D. (2017) Conceptualizing Time in Terms of Space: Experimental Evidence. In: Dancygier, B., Ed., Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 651-668.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339732.041
[28] Casasanto, D. (2009) Embodiment of Abstract Concepts: Good and Bad in Right- and Left-Handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 138, 351-367.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015854
[29] Casasanto, D. (2017) The Hierarchical Structure of Mental Metaphors. In: Hampe, B., Ed., Metaphor: Embodied Cognition and Discourse, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 46-61.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108182324.004
[30] Casasanto, D. and Bruin, A. (2019) Metaphors We Learn by: Directed Motor Action Improves Word Learning. Cognition, 182, 177-183.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.015
[31] Gallese (2016) Finding the Body in the Brain: From Simulation Theory to Embodied Simulation. In: McLaughlin and Kornblith, Eds., Goldman and His Critics, Wiley Blackwell, Oxford, 297-317.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118609378.ch14