青歌赛评分机制的公平性研究—基于评委情感因素过滤的视角
Research of Fair Grading Mechanism in Youth Singer Competition—Based on the Commentators Affective Filter
DOI: 10.12677/MSE.2013.21002, PDF, HTML, 下载: 3,062  浏览: 9,446  国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 李伟伟*, 郭亚军, 易平涛:东北大学工商管理学院,沈阳
关键词: 综合评价群组评价权重系数情感过滤循环优化Comprehensive Evaluation; Group Evaluation; Weight Modulus; Affective Filter; Circulation Optimization
摘要: CCTV青年歌手电视大奖赛自举办以来,评分机制一直是争议颇多的一大问题,评分的客观公正与否直接关系到比赛的公平性。针对这一问题,从评委情感因素过滤的视角提出了一种评价模型。该模型的基本原理是首先给定参赛选手一个待定的虚拟得分值向量,然后以虚拟得分值与评委群体评分值向量的贴近度最大为基准,对虚拟得分值进行循环优化,使其不断接近于参赛选手的客观表现。最后,通过一个模拟算例验证了带有情感过滤特征评价模型的有效性。
Abstract: There is always a dispute about scoring mechanism of the Youth Singer Competition which is held by CCTV in China, because the scoring objectivity is related to competition fairness directly. To this problem, we present one scoring model associated with the commentators’ affective filter. The basic principle of this model is as follows. First, each competitor is given a fictitious scoring vector. Second, the fictitious scoring vector is optimized repeatedly through the maximal approaching degree between the fictitious and the group scoring vector. At last, a simulation example is given to illustrate the validity of the affective filter scoring model.
文章引用:李伟伟, 郭亚军, 易平涛. 青歌赛评分机制的公平性研究—基于评委情感因素过滤的视角[J]. 管理科学与工程, 2013, 2(1): 6-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/MSE.2013.21002

参考文献

[1] D. Black. The theory of committed and elections. Cambridge: Cam-bridge Univisity Press, 1958.
[2] C. L. Hwang. Group decision mak-ing under multiple criteria, methods and applications. Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlay, 1987.
[3] F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma and J. L. Verdegay. A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1996, 78(1): 73-87.
[4] K. H. Chen and H. H. Lin. Interactive group deci-sion-making. Modeling and Application Socioeconomic Planning Sciences, 1998, 32(2): 113-121.
[5] H. K. Soung, H. C. Sang and K. K. Jae. An interactive procedure for multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete information: Range-based approch. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 118(1): 139-152.
[6] F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma and F. Chiclana. Multiperson deci-sion-making based on multiplicative preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 129(2): 372- 385.
[7] E. Bendoly, D. G. Bachraeh. A process-based model for priority conver-gence in multi-period group decision-making. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 148(3): 534-545.
[8] I. Takehiro. Cluster ability of groups and information exchange in group decision making with approval voting system. Applied Mathematles and Complltation, 2003, 136: l-15.
[9] Z. S. Xu, P. R. Yager. Power-geometric operators and their use in group decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2010, 18(1): 94-105.
[10] 苏波, 王烷尘. 群决策研究的评述[J]. 决策与决策支持系统, 1995, 5(3): l15-124.
[11] 魏存平, 邱苑华. 群体决策基本理论评述[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版), 2000, 13(2): 24-28.
[12] 易平涛. 多属性综合评价的理论与应用研究[D]. 东北大学博士学位论文, 2006: 1.
[13] 徐玖平. 群决策理论与方法及实现[M]. 清华大学出版社, 2009: 54.
[14] 彭怡. 动态群体决策理论及其应用研究[D]. 西南交通大学博士研究生学位论文, 2006.
[15] 徐选华, 陈晓红. 基于矢量空间的群体聚类方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2005, 27(6): 1034-1037.
[16] 王丹力, 戴汝为. 专家群体思维收敛的研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2002, 5(2): 1-5.
[17] 岳超源. 决策理论与方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003.