AP  >> Vol. 4 No. 3 (May 2014)

    自我信息对注意的影响
    The Effect of Attention to Self-Related Information

  • 全文下载: PDF(380KB) HTML    PP.375-383   DOI: 10.12677/AP.2014.43053  
  • 下载量: 2,196  浏览量: 10,004  

作者:  

王 芳,杨红升,顾念君:西南大学心理学部,重庆

关键词:
自我信息注意捕获鸡尾酒会效应Self-Related Information Attention Capture Cocktail-Party Effect

摘要:

关于自我信息能否捕获注意在不同的实验范式中得到的结论并不一致,从而引发诸多争议。本文分别比较了自我姓名和自我面孔在不同实验范式中对注意的影响,大量研究证明自己的名字只有在注意焦点内才能捕获注意;而当实验任务不同时,自我面孔即使都在注意焦点内呈现,得到的结果也不尽相同,从而表明在考察和比较名字和面孔等自我信息对注意的影响作用时,既要考虑实验范式在其中所起的作用,也要兼顾不同的自我信息本身所具有的特点。在今后的研究中则需要进一步考察熟悉性对自我信息在注意捕获中所起的作用,以及自我信息的注意性质。

Studies of attention capture by self-related information have reached inconsistent results, so there is much debate about whether self-related information can capture attention automatically. Given this, the current paper compared effect of self-face and self-name on attention in different researches. The self-name captured attention when presented at the focus of attention, however, the self-face reached contradictory outcomes when presented at fixation among the different tasks. These results indicate that it should take experimental tasks and the specific features of self-re- lated information into account, when the effect of self-face and self-name on attention is explored. The future research should explore the effect of familiarity on attention capture for self-related information and the processing of attention to self-related information.

文章引用:
王芳, 杨红升, 顾念君 (2014). 自我信息对注意的影响. 心理学进展, 4(3), 375-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2014.43053

参考文献

[1] 刘明慧, 王凌云, 隋洁, 张明(2012). 自我面孔对空间注意的调控: 来自Posner空间线索范式的证据. 心理科学, 1期, 24-29.
[2] 孙晓, 李肖, 贾磊, 张庆林(2013). 自我姓名加工的相对独特性: 来自RSVP的证据. 心理科学, 1期, 72-77.
[3] 杨红升, 黄希庭(2007). 自我信息加工的独特性: 来自人名识别研究的证据. 心理科学, 5期, 1127-1129.
[4] 杨红升, 王芳, 顾念君, 黄希庭(2012). 自我相关信息的加工优势: 来自网名识别的证据. 心理学报, 4期, 489-497.
[5] Arnell, K. M., Shapiro, K. L., & Sorensen, R. E. (1999). Reduced repetition blindness for one’s own name. Visual Cognition, 6, 609-635.
[6] Bargh, J. A. (1982). Attention and automaticity in the processing of self-relevant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 425-436.
[7] Bentin, S., & Deouell, L. Y. (2000). Structural encoding and identification in face processing: ERP evidence for separate mechanisms. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 35-55.
[8] Brédart, S., Delchambre, M., & Laureys, S. (2006). One’s own face is hard to ignore. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 46-52.
[9] Berlad, I., & Pratt, H. (1995). P300 in response to the subject’s own name. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 96, 472-474.
[10] Bundesen, C., Kyllingsbaek, S., Houmann, K. J., & Jensen, R. M. (1997). Is visual attention automatically attracted by one’s own name? Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 714-720.
[11] Caharel, S., Courtay, N., Bernard, C., Lalonde, R., & Rebaï, M. (2005). Familiarity and emotional expression influence an early stage of face processing: An electrophysiological study. Brain and Cognition, 59, 96-100.
[12] Caharel, S., Poiroux, S., Bernard, C., Thibaut, F., Lalonde, R., & Rebai, M. (2002). ERPs associated with familiarity and degree of familiarity during face recognition. International Journal of Neuroscience, 112, 1499-1512.
[13] Conway, A. R., Cowan, N., & Bunting, M. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 331-335.
[14] Devue, C., & Brédart, S. (2008). Attention to self-referential stimuli: Can I ignore my own face? Acta Psychologica, 128, 290-297.
[15] Devue, C., & Brédart, S. (2011). The neural correlates of visual self-recognition. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 40-51.
[16] Devue, C., Collette, F., Balteau, E., Degueldre, C., Luxen, A., Maquet, P., & Brédart, S. (2007). Here I am: The cortical correlates of visual self-recognition. Brain Research, 1143, 169-182.
[17] Devue, C., Van der Stigchel, S., Brédart, S., & Theeuwes, J. (2009). You do not find your own face faster; you just look at it longer. Cognition, 111, 114-122.
[18] Eimer, M. (2000). Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 694-705.
[19] Fischer, C., Dailler, F., & Morlet, D. (2008). Novelty P3 elicited by the subject’s own name in comatose patients. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119, 2224-2230.
[20] Fischler, I., Jin, Y. S., Boaz, T. L., Perry, N. W., & Childers, D. G. (1987). Brain potentials related to seeing one’s own name. Brain and Language, 30, 245-262.
[21] Folmer, R. L., & Yingling, C. D. (1997). Auditory P3 responses to name stimuli. Brain and Language, 56, 306-311.
[22] Gray, H. M., Ambady, N., Lowenthal, W. T., & Deldin, P. (2004). P300 as an index of attention to self-relevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 216-224.
[23] Gronau, N., Cohen, A., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (2003). Dissociations of personally significant and task-relevant distractors inside and outside the focus of attention: A combined behavioral and psychophysiological study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 512-529.
[24] Harris, C. R., & Pashler, H. (2004). Attention and the processing of emotional words and names-not so special after all. Psychological Science, 15, 171-178.
[25] Harris, C. R., Pashler, H. E., & Coburn, P. (2004). Moray revisited: High-priority affective stimuli and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 1-31.
[26] Kawahara, J. I., & Yamada, Y. (2004). Does one’s name attract visual attention? Visual Cognition, 11, 997-1017.
[27] Keenan, J. P., Freund, S., Hamilton, R. H., Ganis, G., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2000). Hand response differences in a self-face identification task. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1047-1053.
[28] Keenan, J. P., McCutcheon, B., Freund, S., Gallup Jr, G. G., Sanders, G., & Pascual-Leone, A. (1999). Left hand advantage in a self-face recognition task. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1421-1425.
[29] Keyes, H., Brady, N., Reilly, R. B., & Foxe, J. J. (2010). My face or yours? Event-related potential correlates of self-face processing. Brain and Cognition, 72, 244-254.
[30] Laarni, J., Koljonen, M., Kuistio, A., Kyrolainen, S., Lempiainen, J., & Lepisto, T. (2000). Images of a familiar face do not capture attention under conditions of inattention. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90, 1216-1218.
[31] Moray, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 56-60.
[32] Müller, H. M., & Kutas, M. (1996). What’s in a name? Electrophysiological differences between spoken nouns, proper names and one’s own name. NeuroReport, 8, 221-225.
[33] Ninomiya, H., Onitsuka, T., Chen, C. H. O., Sato, E., & Tashiro, N. (1998). P300 in response to the subject’s own face. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 52, 519-522.
[34] Oswald, I., Taylor, A. M., & Treisman, M. (1960). Discriminative responses to stimulation during human sleep. Brain, 83, 440-453.
[35] Pannese, A., & Hirsch, J. (2010). Self-specific priming effect. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 962-968.
[36] Perrin, F., Garcı́a-Larrea, L., Mauguière, F., & Bastuji, H. (1999). A differential brain response to the subject’s own name persists during sleep. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 2153-2164.
[37] Perrin, F., Bastuji, H., Mauguière, F., & García-Larrea, L. (2000). Functional dissociation of the early and late portions of human K-complexes. Neuroreport, 11, 1637-1640.
[38] Platek, S. M., Loughead, J. W., Gur, R. C., Busch, S., Ruparel, K., Phend, N., Panyavin, I. S., & Langleben, D. D. (2006). Neural substrates for functionally discriminating self-face from personally familiar faces. Human Brain Mapping, 2, 91- 98.
[39] Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
[40] Pratt, H., Berlad, I., & Lavie, P. (1999). “Oddball” event-related potentials and information processing during REM and non-REM sleep. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 53-61.
[41] Qin, P., Liu, Y., Shi, J., Wang, Y., Duncan, N., Gong, Q., Weng, X., & Northoff, G. (2012). Dissociation between anterior and posterior cortical regions during self-specificity and familiarity: A combined fMRI-meta-analytic study. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 154-164.
[42] Shapiro, K. L., Caldwell, J., & Sorensen, R. E. (1997). Personal names and the attentional blink: A visual “cocktail party” effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 504-514.
[43] Shelley-Tremblay, J., & Mack, A. (1999). Metacontrast masking and attention. Psychological Science, 10, 508-515.
[44] Sugiura, M., Sassa, Y., Jeong, H., Horie, K., Sato, S., & Kawashima, R. (2008). Face-specific and domain-general characteristics of cortical responses during self-recognition. Neuroimage, 42, 414-422.
[45] Sui, J., Zhu, Y., & Han, S. (2006). Self-face recognition in attended and unattended conditions: An event-related brain potential study. NeuroReport, 17, 423-427.
[46] Tacikowski, P., Brechmann, A., Marchewka, A., Jednoróg, K., Dobrowolny, M., & Nowicka, A. (2011). Is it about the self or the significance? An fMRI study of self-name recognition. Social Neuroscience, 6, 98-107.
[47] Tacikowski, P., Brechmann, A., & Nowicka, A. (2013). Cross-modal pattern of brain activations associated with the pro- cessing of self- and significant other’s name. Human Brain Mapping, 34, 2069-2077.
[48] Tacikowski, P., & Nowicka, A. (2010). Allocation of attention to self-name and self-face: An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 84, 318-324.
[49] Taylor, M. J., Arsalidou, M., Bayless, S. J., Morris, D., Evans, J. W., & Barbeau, E. J. (2009). Neural correlates of personally familiar faces: Parents, partner and own faces. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 2008-2020.
[50] Tong, F., & Nakayama, K. (1999). Robust representations for faces: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1016-1035.
[51] Troje, N. F., & Kersten, D. (1999). Viewpoint-dependent recognition of familiar faces. Perception, 28, 483-487.
[52] Tsakiris, M. (2008). Looking for myself: Current multisensory input alters self-face recognition. PloS ONE, 3, e4040.
[53] Uddin, L. Q., Kaplan, J. T., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Zaidel, E., & Iacoboni, M. (2005). Self-face recognition activates a frontoparietal “mirror” network in the right hemisphere: An event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage, 25, 926-935.
[54] Wolford, G., & Morrison, F. (1980). Processing of unattended visual information. Memory & Cognition, 8, 521-527.
[55] Wood, N., & Cowan, N. (1995). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: How frequent are attention shifts to one’s name in an irrelevant auditory channel? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 21, 255-260.
[56] Yang, H., Wang, F., Gu, N., Gao, X., & Zhao, G. (2013). The cognitive advantage for one’s own name is not simply familiarity: An eye-tracking study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1176-1180.