自我分化与现实人际关系、网络人际关系的关系研究
The Study on Relationship between Self-Differentiation and Real Interpersonal Relationships, Network Interpersonal Relationships
摘要: 目的:探讨自我分化与现实人际关系、网络人际关系的关系。方法:根据方便取样从北京市4所综合高校选取618名被试,采用大学生自我分化量表和现实与网络人际互动量表进行调查。结果:1) 典型相关发现,在情感表露层面网络人际关系是现实人际关系的补偿,在信息表露层面网络人际关系与现实人际关系表现趋向一致;2) 高自我分化大学生在现实人际各维度得分均显著高于低自我分化大学生,而低自我分化大学生更倾向于与网友情感表露;3) 自我分化的情感断绝维度是影响网络人际关系相对重要的因素。结论:网络与现实人际关系彼此相关,受个体自我分化发展影响。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the relationship among the self-differentiation, reality interpersonal rela-tionships and network interpersonal relationships. Method: 618 college students from 4 colleges in Beijing completed Differentiation of Self Inventory and Reality and the Network Interaction Scale. Results: 1) By canonical correlation analysis, we can find that the network is compensation to reality interpersonal relationships in the emotional disclosure level, and the performance of reality and networks interpersonal tends to be consistent in the information disclosure level; 2) The reality interpersonal relationships of students who have high level of self-differentiation are significantly better than the students who have low self-differentiation, and those students who have low self-differentiation prefer more intimacy disclosure behavior in network; 3) Emotional cutoff was the most important influencing factor for network interpersonal relationships. Conclusion: Reality interpersonal relationships and network interpersonal relationships affect each other relatively, and are impacted by the self-differentiation.
文章引用:方清, 安芹 (2014). 自我分化与现实人际关系、网络人际关系的关系研究. 心理学进展, 4(4), 632-639. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2014.44085

参考文献

[1] 安芹, 邱剑, 刘玉利(2011). 自我分化在大学生家庭功能与自我和谐关系中的中介作用. 中国心理卫生杂志, 11期, 851-855.
[2] 陈嬿竹(2002). 网络与真实人际关系、人格特质及幸福感之相关研究. 硕士学位论文, 台湾: 国立屏东师范学院.
[3] 吴煜辉, 王桂平(2010). 大学生自我分化量表的初步修订. 心理研究, 4期, 40-45.
[4] 薛莹, 杨蕴萍(2013). 门诊焦虑障碍患者的自我分化水平研究. 精神医学杂志, 3期, 161-164.
[5] 姚玉红, 刘亮, 赵旭东(2011). 不同性别低年级大学生的自我分化与心理健康: 自尊的调节作用. 中国心理卫生杂志, 11期, 856-861.
[6] Bowen, M. (1976). Theory in the practice of psychotherapy. In: P. J. Guerin (Ed.), Family Therapy: Theory and Practice (pp. 42-90). New York: Gamer Press.
[7] Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice (pp. 118-124). New York: Jason Aronson.
[8] Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & De Zuniga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 247-253.
[9] Friedman, E. H. (1991). Bowen theory and therapy. Handbook of Family Therapy, 2, 134-170.
[10] Kerr, M. E., & Bowen, M. (1988). Family evaluation (pp. 235-257). New York: Norton.
[11] Papero, D. V. (1990). Bowen family systems theory. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
[12] Peleg, O. (2002). Bowen theory: A study of differentiation of self and students’ social anxiety and physiological symptoms. Contemporary Family Therapy, 25, 355-369.
[13] Peleg, O. (2006). The relationship of maternal separation anxiety and differentiation of self to children’s separation anxiety and adjustment to kindergarten: A study in Druzeamilies. Anxiety Disorders, 20, 973-995.
[14] Peter, J., Valkenburg, P., & Schouten, A. P. (2005). Developing a model of adolescent friendship formation on the internet. Cyber-Psychology and Behavior, 8, 423-430.
[15] Skowron, E. A. (2000). The role of differentiation of self in marital adjustment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 229.
[16] Wang, J. L., & Wang, H. Z. (2011). The predictive effects of online communication on well-being among Chinese adolescents. Psychology, 2, 359-362.