DRM范式错误记忆的通道效应
Modality Effect in False Memory in DRM Paradigm
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2011.12012, PDF, HTML, 下载: 3,539  浏览: 9,401 
作者: 毛伟宾*：山东师范大学心理学院；王林松：
关键词: 错误记忆；DRM范式；通道效应；视觉通道；听觉通道；False memory; DRM; Modality effect; Visual modality; Auditory modality
摘要: Deese-Roediger-McDermott（DRM）范式错误记忆通道效应的研究发轫于对错误记忆产生机制的研究。1998年，Smith和Hunt首次研究并提出了DRM范式的错误记忆通道效应问题，即在视觉测验条件下，听觉学习转为视觉学习后会导致更低的错误再认或错误回忆，从此引发了一系列关于错误记忆通道效应的实证研究。研究者从编码与提取两个角度阐释了DRM范式错误记忆通道效应的产生机制，并分析了年龄、编码方式和注意水平等因素在错误记忆通道效应中的作用。最后指出未来研究可以从其他研究范式以及脑生理机制的角度去进一步探讨错误记忆的通道效应。
Abstract: The researches on modality effect in false memory stemmed from studying on mechanism of false memory. In 1998, Smith and Hunt firstly reported and defined the modality effect on false memory, namely there is a lower false recognition to critical lures following visual presentation than following auditory presentation, which was followed by a number of experimental studies. The researchers introduce and explain the mechanism of modality effect in false memory from the view of encoding phase and retrieval phase, and analyses roles of some factors, such as age, loudly reading, and divided attention, on modality effect in false memory. In the end, the researchers put forward that modality effect in false memory could be further studied by using other experiment paradigms and using ERP or brain imaging technology.
文章引用：毛伟宾, 王林松 (2011). DRM范式错误记忆的通道效应. 心理学进展, 1(2), 77-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/ap.2011.12012

参考文献

[1] 林仲贤, 韩布新(1999). 汉字词识别过程中的形、音、义编码作用的研究. 心理科学, 1期, 1-4.
[2] 毛伟宾, 杨治良, 王林松, 袁建伟(2008). 非熟练中–英双语者跨语言的错误记忆通道效应. 心理学报, 3期, 274-282.
[3] 叶茂林, 刘湘玲(2008). 正确记忆与错误记忆中的感觉通道效应研究. 心理科学, 5期, 1104-1107.
[4] 周晓林, 曲延轩, 庄捷(2003). 再探汉字加工中语音、语义激活的相对时间进程. 心理与行为研究, 14期, 241-247.
[5] Arndt, J., & Reder, L. M. (2003). The effect of distinctive visual information on false recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 1-15.
[6] Cleary, A. M., & Greene, R. L. (2002). Paradoxical effects of presentation modality on false memory. Memory, 10, 55-61.
[7] Deese, J. (1959). Influence of inter-item associative strength upon immediate free recall. Psychological Reports, 5, 305-312.
[8] Gallo, D. A., McDermott, K. B., Percer, J. M., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2001). Modality effects in false recall and false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2001, 27, 339-353.
[9] Gallo, D. A., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2003). The effects of associations and aging on illusory recollections. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1036-1044.
[10] Hege, A. C. G., & Dodson, C. S. (2004). Why distinctive information reduces false memories: Evidence for both impoverished relation- al-encoding and distinctiveness heuristic accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 787- 795.
[11] Israel, L., & Schacter, D. L. (1997). Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 577-581.
[12] Kayser, J. F., Regan T., Craig, E. B., & Gerard, E. (2003). Event- related brain potentials during auditory and visual word recognition memory tasks. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 11-25.
[13] Kellogg, R. T. (2001). Presentation modality and mode of recall in verbal false memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 913-919.
[14] Mao, W. B., Yang, Z. L., & Wang, L. S. (2010). Effect of modality in false recognition: Evidence from Chinese Characters. International Journal of Psychology, 45, 4-11.
[15] Maylor, E. A., & Mo, A. (1999). Effects of study-test modality on false recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 477-493.
[16] Nabeta, T., & Kawahara, J.-I. (2006). Congruency effect of presentation modality on false recognition of haptic and visual objects. Memory, 14, 307-315.
[17] Pérez-Mata, M. N., Read, J. D., & Diges, M. (2002). Effects of divided attention and word concreteness on correct recall and false memory reports. Memory, 10, 161-177.
[18] Pierce, B. H., Gallo, D. A., Weiss, J. A., & Schacter, D. L. (2005). The modality effect in false recognition: evidence for test-based monitoring. Memory & Cognition, 3, 1407-1413.
[19] Rummer, R., Schweppe, J., & Martin, R. A. (2009). Modality congruency effect in verbal false memory. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 473-483.
[20] Roediger, H. L., McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803-814.
[21] Smith, R. E., & Hunt, R. R. (1998). Presentation modality affects false memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 710-715.
[22] Smith, R. E., Hunt, R. R., & Gallagher, M. P. (2008). The effect of study modality on false recognition. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1439-1449.
[23] Smith, R. E., Lozito, J. P., & Bayen, U. J. (2005). Adult age differences in distinctive processing: The modality effect on false recall. Psychology and Aging, 20, 486-492.
[24] Wilding, E. L., Doyle, M. C., & Rugg, M. D. (1995). Recognition memory with and without retrieval of context: An event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia, 33, 734-764.