测量大学生的冒险态度：Go/NoGo联想任务与ERP记录的结合
Measuring Risk-taking Attitude of Undergraduates: A combination of Go/NoGo association task with ERP recordings
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2011.12013, PDF, HTML, 下载: 3,857  浏览: 9,998 
作者: 贺音：首都师范大学；张钦*：首都师范大学教育学院心理系；赵国凤：首都师范大学硕士研究生
关键词: 冒险；内隐态度；Go/NoGo联想任务；事件相关电位（ERP）；Risk–taking; Implicit attitude; Go/NoGo association task (GNAT); event-related potential (ERP)
摘要: 本研究将冒险行为分为社会许可冒险行为和问题行为，采用Go/NoGo联想任务和事件相关电位（ERP）技术探讨了处于当代的一些中国大学生对这两类冒险行为的态度。行为结果表明，被试对冒险行为词-消极词联结的感受性显著大于冒险行为词-积极词联结。ERP结果表明，在冒险词呈现后140-300ms时窗，与积极词联结的冒险词比与消极词联结的冒险词诱发了更大的P200。在400-700ms时窗，与积极词联结的问题行为词比与消极词联结的问题行为词诱发了更大的LPP，但是，社会许可冒险行为词没有表现出类似的ERP效应。本研究结果意味着，无论是社会许可冒险行为还是问题行为，被试对它们的评价都是相对消极的。并且，对冒险行为的消极评价可能影响了被试对冒险词的早期语义加工和后期的刺激分类过程。
Abstract: The present research employed implicit Go/NoGo association task and ERP measurement to investigate undergraduates’ attitude for the permitted and unpermitted risk–taking behaviors. The behavioral results showed that the undergraduates’ attitude for two kinds of risk-taking behaviors was negative. Meantime, our ERP results indicated that the words representing risk-taking behaviors evoked larger P200 when they were associated with positive words than when they were associated with negative words in the 140-300 ms time window after words onset. This P200 effect didn’t interacted with the type of risk-taking behaviors. During 400-700ms time window, the words representing unpermitted risk-taking behaviors evoked larger LPP when they were associated with positive words than when they were associated with negative words. However, no similar LPP effect was found for permitted risk-taking behaviors. These results suggest that negative attitude of undergraduates for the risk-taking behaviors possibly influences on early semantic processing and late stimuli categorization. The positive social evaluation for permitted risk–taking behaviors also maybe impacts on the stimuli categorization.
文章引用：贺音, 张钦, 赵国凤 (2011). 测量大学生的冒险态度：Go/NoGo联想任务与ERP记录的结合. 心理学进展, 1(2), 83-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/ap.2011.12013

参考文献

[1] 单雯, 金盛华, 张卫青, 盛瑞鑫(2010). 从进化心理学视角看两性冒险行为. 心理科学进展, 11期, 1828-1838.
[2] 韩菁(2008). 青少年冒险行为研究综述. 中国青年政治学院学报, 2期, 1-6.
[3] 李宏利, 张雷(2010). 求偶动机对男性冒险倾向的影响. 心理学报, 5期, 618-624.
[4] 刘金平, 韩菁, 刘亚丽(2008). 青少年冒险行为及其与人格、依恋的关系. 心理学探新, 3期, 77-81.
[5] 谢晓非, 周俊哲, 王丽(2004). 风险情景中不同成就动机者的冒险行为特征. 心理学报, 6期, 744-749.
[6] 谢晓非(2001). 乐观与冒险. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 6期, 859- 868.
[7] 许静, 梁宁建, 王岩, 王新法(2005). 内隐自尊的ERP研究. 心理科学, 4期, 792-796.
[8] 张明, 陈丽娜(2003). 感觉寻求与青少年冒险行为研究的现状和趋势. 东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版), 3期, 125-129.
[9] Banfield, J. F., van der Lugt, A. H., & Münte, T. F. (2006). Juicy fruit and creepy crawlies: An electrophysiological study of the implicit Go/NoGo association task. NeuroImage, 31, 1841-1849.
[10] Cacioppo, J. T. (2000). Electrophysiological evidence of implicit and explicit categorization processes. Journal of Experimental SocialPsychology, 36, 660-676.
[11] Crites, S. L., Jr., Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1995). Bioelectrical echoes from evaluative categorization: II. A late positive brain potential that varies as a function of attitude registration rather than attitude report. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 997-1013.
[12] Delplanque, S., Silvert, L., Hot, P., Rigoulot, S., & Sequeira, H. (2006). Arousal and valence effects on event-related P3a and P3b during emotional categorization. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60, 315-322.
[13] Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 355-372.
[14] Dong, G., Lu, Q., Zhou, H., Zhao, X. (2010). Impulse inhibition in people with Internet addiction disorder: Electrophysiological evidence from a Go/NoGo study. Neuroscience Letters, 485, 138-142.
[15] Fazio, R. H., Chen, J. M., MeDonel, E. C., & Sherman, J. (1982). Attitude accessibility, attitude behavior consistency, and strength of the object-evaluation association. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 339-357.
[16] Gray, H. M., Ambady, N., Lowenthal, W. T., Deldin, P. (2004). P300 as an index of attention to self-relevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 216-224.
[17] Gullone, E., & Moore, S. (2000). Adolescent risk- taking and the five- factor model of personality. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 393-407.
[18] Paller, K. A., Kutas, M., & Mayes, A. R. (1987). Neural correlates of encoding in an incidental learning paradigm. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 67, 360-371.
[19] Wang, X. T., Daniel, J. K., & Andreas, W. (2009). Life history variables and risk-taking propensity. Evolution &Human Behavior, 30, 77-84.
[20] Zuckerman, M., & Kuhlman, D. M. (2000). Personality and risk-taking: Common biosocial factors. Journal of Personality, 68, 999-1029.