创造性的领域特殊性与领域一般性的争论
The Debate on Domain Specificity and Domain Generality of Creativity
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2011.12014, PDF, HTML,  被引量 下载: 4,068  浏览: 20,006 
作者: 吉海霞, 谷传华*：湖北省人的发展与心理健康重点实验室暨华中师范大学心理学院
关键词: 领域特殊性；领域一般性；创造性；domain specificity; domain generality; creativity
摘要: 创造性是领域一般性的或跨领域的，还是具有领域特殊性？长期以来，这个问题一直颇具争议。近年来，越来越多的研究表明，创造性的绩效表现是具有领域特殊性的。文章首先对创造性的领域特殊性内涵及其理论基础进行剖析，然后探讨了领域特殊性研究的现状和创造性的游乐园理论模型，回顾了关于领域特殊性和领域一般性的争论，并指出了未来的研究方向。
Abstract: Is creativity domain-general or domain-specific? For many years, this question has been controversial. In recent years, a growing number of evidence suggests that creative performance is domain-specific. The article firstly analyzed the connotation of domain specificity of creativity and its theoretical basis, and then discussed the current research of domain specificity and the Amusement Park Theoretical Model of Creativity, and reviewed the debate on domain specificity and domain generality, and pointed out the direction for future research.
文章引用：吉海霞, 谷传华 (2011). 创造性的领域特殊性与领域一般性的争论. 心理学进展, 1(2), 91-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/ap.2011.12014

参考文献

[1] Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27, 158-163.
[2] Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity in creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 173-177.
[3] Baer, J. (2008). Commentary: Divergent thinking tests have problems, but this is not the solution. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and Arts, 2, 89-92.
[4] Baer, J. (1994). Divergent thinking is not a general trait: A multi- domain training experiment. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 35-46.
[5] Baer, J. (1996). The effects of task-specific divergent-thinking training. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 183-187.
[6] Baer, J., Kaufman, J. C., & Gentile, C. A. (2004). Extension of the consensual assessment technique to nonparallel creative products. Creative Research Journal, 16, 113-117.
[7] Chen, C., Himsel, A., Kasof, J., Greenberger, E., & Dmitrieva., J. (2006). Boundless Creativity: Evidence for the Domain Generality of Individual Difference in Creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 40, 179-199.
[8] Han, K.-S., & Marvin, C. (2002). Multiple creativities? Investigating domain-specificity of creativity in young children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 98-109.
[9] Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[10] Kaufman, J. C. (2002). Dissecting the golden goose: Components of studying creative writers. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 27-40.
[11] Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2004). Sure, I’m creative—but not in math!: Self-reported creativity in diverse domains. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 143-155.
[12] Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2005). The amusement park theory of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman, & J. Baer (Eds. ), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 321-328). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[13] Oral, G., Kaufman, J. C., & Agars, M. D. (2007). Examining creativity in Turkey: Do Western findings apply? High Ability Studies, 18, 235-246.
[14] Plucker, J. A. (1998). Beware of simple conclusions: The case for the content generality of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 179-182.
[15] Plucker, J. A. (2005). The (relatively) generalist view of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman, & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 307-312). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[16] Plucker, J. A. (2004). Generalization of creativity across domains: Examination of the method effect hypothesis. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38, 1-11.
[17] Plucker, J. A. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance’s (1958 to present) longitudinal data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103-114.
[18] Runco, M. A. (2006). Introduction to the special issue: Divergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 249-250.
[19] Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 677-688.
[20] Sternberg, R. J. (2005). Creativity or creativities? International Journal of Hu-man-Computer Studies, 63, 370-382.