心理学进展  >> Vol. 3 No. 5 (September 2013)

Romantic Relationship and Self—The Sino-USA Differences of Online Dating Advertisements

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2013.35038, PDF, HTML,  被引量 下载: 3,336  浏览: 15,978 

作者: 刘烯琴*, 任孝鹏:中国科学院心理所行为科学重点实验实

关键词: 网络择偶启事独立自我互依自我Online Personal Advertisements; Independent Self; Interdependent Self

摘要: 在中、美婚恋网站上各选取50名用户的择偶启事,将其自由陈述的内容分为内在特征/外在特征、自我描述/配偶要求两个维度,四大类型,其中外在特征又细分为以经济背景为要素的附属特征,和以身材、相貌为要素的体貌特征,以分析择偶行为的文化差异和性别差异,结果表明,1) 中国择偶者比美国择偶者更重视外在特征,尤其体现在对配偶外在特征要求及对自己外在体貌特征的描述上,表明中国人比美国人互依自我更强;2) 中国择偶者比美国择偶者更多对配偶提出要求,无论是内在特征要求还是外在特征要求,而在自我描述总数量上没有差异;3) 男性择偶者比女性择偶者更多描述自己的外在附属特征;4) 女性择偶者比男性择偶者更多对配偶外在特征提出要求;5) 中国女性比中国男性更多对配偶的外在附属特征提出要求。
Abstract: We selected 50 personal ads on the Chinese dating website and another 50 on the American dating website, and coded the free-texts into two dimensions including self-descriptions/partner-descriptions and in- ternal attributes/external characteristics to compare the culture and gender differences. The external charac- teristics were divided into physical appearances and affiliated characteristics featured by economic back- ground. The numbers of the descriptions of each dimension illustrated the extent the advertisers valued it. Results showed that, 1) Chinese valued external characteristics more than American, especially the physical appearances which demonstrates that Chinese had stronger interdependent self-construals than American; 2) Chinese asked for more requirements than American, including internal or external attributes; 3) Male de- scribed their own affiliated characteristics more than female; 4) Female asked for external characteristics more than male; 5) Chinese female asked for more affiliated characteristics more than male.

文章引用: 刘烯琴, 任孝鹏 (2013). 浪漫关系与自我—网络择偶启事的中美差异. 心理学进展, 3(5), 246-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2013.35038


[1] 董金权, 姚成(2011). 择偶标准: 二十五年的嬗变(1986~2010)——对6612则征婚广告的内容分析. 中国青年研究, 2期, 73-78.
[2] 乐国安, 陈浩, 张彦彦(2005). 进化心理学择偶心理机制假设的跨文化检验——以天津、Boston两地征婚启事的内容分析为例. 心理学报, 4期, 561-568.
[3] 乐国安, 张彦彦, 陈浩(2005). 西方有关择偶启事的研究和论争. 心理科学进展, 2期, 248-256.
[4] Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
[5] Buss, D. M. (1994). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York: Basic Books.
[6] Buunk, A. P., Park, J. H., & Dubbs, S. L. (2008). Parent—Offspring conflict in mate preferences. Review of General Psychology, 12, 47- 62.
[7] Buunk, A. P., Park, J. H., & Duncan, L. A. (2010). Cultural variation in parental influence on mate choice. Cross-Cultural Research, 44, 23-40.
[8] Cameron, C., Oskamp, S., & Sparks, W. (1977). Courtship American style: Newspaper ads. The Family Coordinator, 26, 27-30.
[9] Campos, L. S., Otta, E., & Siqueira, J. O. (2002). Sex differences in mate selection strategies: Content analyses and responses to personal advertisements in Brazil. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 395- 406.
[10] Croll, E. (2006). China’s new consumers: Social development and do-mestic demand. London: Rouotledge.
[11] Cross, S. E., Hardin, E. E., & Swing, B. G. (2011). The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 142-179.
[12] Dion, K., & Dion, K. (1996). Cultural perspectives on romantic love. Personal Relationships, 3, 5-17.
[13] Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 245-264.
[14] Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. K., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 3-66.
[15] Fiore, A. T., Taylor, L. S., Mendelsohn, G. A., & Hearst, M. (2008). Assessing attractiveness in online dating profiles. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 797-806.
[16] Geertz, C. (1975). On the Nature of anthropological understanding. American Scientist, 63, 47-53.
[17] Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals the role of anticipated future interaction, self-dis- closure, and perceived success in online dating. Communication Re- search, 33, 152-177.
[18] Greene, K., Derlega, V. L., & Mathews, A. (2006). Self-disclosure in personal relationships. In A. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 1268-1328). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[19] Gonzales, M., & Meyers, S. (1993). “Your mother would like me”: Self-presentation in the personal ads of heterosexual and homosexual men and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 131-142.
[20] Grossmann, I., & Varnum, M. E. (2010). Social class, culture, and cognition. Social Psychological and Personality Science, published online 23 August 2010.
[21] Hall, E., & Hall, M. (1990). Understanding cultural differences. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
[22] Hitsch, G. J., Hortacsu, A., & Ariely, D. (2006). What makes you click? Mate preferences and matching outcomes in online dating. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago Graduate School of Business.
[23] Kale, S. H., & Spence, M. T. (2009). A trination analysis of social exchange relationships in e-dating (Eds). Gender and Social Com- puting: Interactions, Differences and Relationships (pp. 314-328). Information Science Reference.
[24] Kitayama, S., Park, H., & Sevince, A. T. (2009). A cultural task analy- sis of implicit independence: Comparing North America, Western Europe, and East Asia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 236-255.
[25] Kitayama, S., & Uskul, A. K. (2011). Culture, mind, and the brain: Current evidence and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 419-450.
[26] Kline, S. L., & Zhang, S. (2009). The role of relational communication characteristics and filial piety in mate preferences: Cross-cultural comparisons of Chinese and US college students. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 40, 325-350.
[27] Kowalski, R. M. & Leary, M. R. (1990). Strategic self-presentation and the avoidance of aversive events: Antecedents and consequences of self-enhancement and self-depreciation. Journal of experimental social psychology, 26, 322-336.
[28] Kurzban, R., & Weeden, J. (2005). Hurrydate: Mate preferences in action. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 227-244.
[29] Lenton, A. P., & Francesconi, M. (2010). How humans cognitively manage an abundance of mates. Psychological Science, 21, 528-533.
[30] Li, N. P., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 468-489.
[31] Li, N. P., Valentine, K. A., & Patel, L. (2010). Mate preferences in the US and Singapore: A cross-cultural test of the mate preference priority model. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 1-4.
[32] Lun, J., Mesquita, B., & Smith, B. (2011). Self- and other-presenta- tional styles in the Southern and Northern United States: An analysis of personal ads. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 435- 445.
[33] Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implication for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
[34] Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Markus, K. (2002). Rethinking Individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72.
[35] Rao, A., Schmidt, S. M., & Murray, L. H. (1995). Upward impression management: Goals, influence strategies, and consequences. Human Relations, 48, 147-167.
[36] Sampson, E. E. (1988). The debate on individualism: Indigenous psychologies of the individual and their role in personal and societal functioning. American Psychologist, 43, 15-22.
[37] Sampson, E. E. (1989). The challenge of social change for psychology: Globalization and psychology’s theory of the person. American Psychologist, 44, 914-921.
[38] Schaefer, L. J. (2003). Looking for love, online or on paper. The New York Times, A31.
[39] Sedikides, C., Oliver, M. B., & Campbell, W. K. (1994). Perceived benefits and costs of romantic relationships for women and men: Implications for exchange theory. Personal Relationships, 1, 5-21.
[40] Sev’er, A. (1990). Mate selection patterns of men and women in personal advertisements: New bottle, old wine. Atlantis: A Women’s Studies Journal, 15, 70-76.
[41] Shweder, R. A., & LeVine, R. A. (1984). Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
[42] Strassberg, D. S., & Holty, S. (2003). An experimental study of women’s online personal ads. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 253-260.
[43] Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In: B Campbell (Ed.), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
[44] Ye, J. L. (2006). Seeking love online: A cross-cultural examination of personal advertisements on American and Chinese dating websites. Global Media Journal, 5.
[45] Zhou, S., & Zhu, H. (2004). Perception of romanticism and the ideal spouse among Chinese youth. Asian Journal of Communication, 14, 22-37.