心理学进展  >> Vol. 3 No. 5 (September 2013)

The Neural Basis of Social Status Recognition and Its Influencing Factors

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2013.35040, PDF, HTML, 下载: 2,863  浏览: 10,203 

作者: 高丽丽*, 段锦云:苏州大学教育学院;卞海勇*, 袁昌兵*, 魏秋江*:苏州大学文正学院

关键词: 社会身份神经科学下顶叶单侧化Social Status; Neuroscience; Inferior Parietal Context; Cerebral Hemispheric Dominance

摘要: 在社会交往过程中,辨识彼此的社会身份至关重要。从神经生理学角度探讨社会身份机制,成为该领域研究的新热点。现有研究显示,与社会身份辨识相关的脑区有前额叶皮层、下顶叶、颞上回、枕颞叶和脑岛,尤其以前额叶的前扣带回、下顶叶的顶内沟为主。社会身份辨识的相关脑区受到个人特质、儿童期社会经济地位、社会文化等因素影响。文章最后从研究方法的改进、干扰因素的控制与排除、大脑半球单侧化优势等方面探讨了现有社会身份辨识脑神经研究的不足,并提出了相应的改进建议。
Abstract:  In social communication, recognizing others’ status is very important. Investigating social status recognition from neuroscience perspective is becoming more and more popular. It has been showed that there are many brain areas which relate with social status, for example, prefrontal cortex, inferior parietal contex, superior temporal gyrus, occipitotemporal cortex and insula, particularly anterior cingulate cortex of prefron- tal cortex, intraparietal sulci of inferior parietal are very important. Then the paper introduces that many fac- tors, such as personal traits, socioeconomic status of childhood, social cultures, can affect the brain areas’ functions whose is associated with social status recognition. Finally, we discuss the current shortages of the social recognition’ neuroscience including improvement of study methods, the control and eliminate of inter- ference factor, cerebral hemispheric dominance, and so on, furthermore take corresponding advices.

文章引用: 高丽丽, 段锦云, 卞海勇, 袁昌兵, 魏秋江 (2013). 社会身份辨识的神经基础及其影响因素. 心理学进展, 3(5), 262-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2013.35040


[1] 姜媛, 林崇德(2010). 情绪的脑单侧化研究进展. 心理与行为研究, 4期, 312-318.
[2] 张晶, 石向实(2010). 社会认知神经科学研究十年: 回顾与展望. 心理学探新, 4期, 29-33.
[3] Allison, T., Puce, A., & McCarthy, G. (2000). Social perception from visual cues: Role of the STS region. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 267-278.
[4] Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006). Meeting of minds: The medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 268-277.
[5] Anderson, C., Srivastava, S., Beer, J., Spataro, S. E., & Chatman, J. A. (2006). Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in social groups. Journal of Perso-nality and Social Psychology, 91, 1094- 1110.
[6] Cheney, S. L., & Seyfarth, R. M. (1990). The representation of social relations by monkeys. Cognition, 37, 167-196.
[7] Chiao, J. Y. (2010). Neural basis of social status hierarchy across species. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 20, 803-809.
[8] Chiao, J. Y., Vani, A., Mathur., Tokiko H., & Trixie L. (2009). Neural basis of preference for human social hierarchy versus egalitarianism. Values, Empathy, and Fairness across Social Barriers, 1167, 174-181.
[9] Chiao, J. Y., Haradaa, T., Emily, R. O., Zhang, L., Parrish, T., & Bridge, D. J. (2009). Neural representations of social status hierarchy in human inferior parietal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 47, 354-363.
[10] Chiao, J. Y., Adams Jr., R. B., Tse, P. U. et al. (2008). Knowing who’s boss: fMRI and ERP investigations of social dominance perception. Group Relations and Intergroup Processes (Special Issue in Social Neuroscience), 11, 201-214.
[11] Chiao, J. Y., Bordeaux, A. R., & Ambady, N. (2004). Mental representations of social status. Cognition, 93, B49-B57.
[12] Cohen-Kadosh, R., Henik, A., Rubinsten, O., Mohr, H., Dori, H., Van de Ven, V., Zorzi, M., Hendler, T., Goebel, R., & Linden, D. (2005). Are numbers special? The comparison systems of the human brain investigated by fMRI. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1238-1248.
[13] Farrow, T. F., Jones, S. C., Kaylor-Hughes, C. J., Wilkinson, I. D., Woodruff, P. W., Hunter, M. D., & Spence, S. A. (2011). Higher or lower? The functional anatomy of perceived allocentric social hierarchies. Neuroimage, 57, 1552-1560.
[14] Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689-723.
[15] Freeman, J. B., Rule, N. O., Adams, R. B., & Ambady, N. (2009). Culture shapes a mesolimbic response to signals of dominance and subordination that associates with behavior. Neuroimage, 47, 353- 359.
[16] Grosenick, L., Celement, T. S., & Fernald, R. D. (2007). Fish can infer social rank by observation alone. Nature, 445, 429-432.
[17] Hackman, D., & Farah, M. J. (2008). Socioeco-nomic status and brain development. Trends in Cognitive Science, 13, 65-73.
[18] Hein, G., & Singer, T. (2008). I feel how you feel but not always: The empathic brain and its modulation. Current Opinion in neurobiology, 18, 1-6.
[19] Hsu, M., Anen, C., & Quartz, S. R. (2008). The right and the good: Distributive justice and neural encoding of equity and efficiency. Science, 320, 1092-1095.
[20] Iacoboni, M., Lieberman, M. D., Knowlton, B. J., Molnar-Szakacs, M. M., Throop, J., & Fiske, A. P. (2004). Watching social interactions produces dorsomedial and medial parietal BOLD fMRI signal increases compared to a resting baseline. Neuroimage, 21, 1167-1173.
[21] Iacoboni, M. (2009). Imitation, empathy and mirror neurons. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 653-670.
[22] Karafin, M. S., Tranel, D., & Adolphs, R. (2004). Dominance attributions following damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognition Neuroscience, 16, 1796-1804.
[23] Krendl, A., Richeson, J. A., Kelley, W., & Heatherton, T. F. (2008). The negative consequences of threat: An fMRI investigation of the neural mechanisms underlying women’s underperformance in math. Psy- chological Science, 19, 168-175.
[24] Maarten, A., Boksem. S., Smolders, R., & Cremer, D. D. (2009). Social power and approach-related neural activity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1, 1-5.
[25] Marsh, A. A., Blair, K. S., Jones, M. M., Soliman, N., & Blair, R. J. R. (2009). Dominance and submission: The ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and responses to status cues. Journal of Cognition Neurosciene, 21, 713-724.
[26] Neider, A. (2005). Counting on neurons: The neurobiology of numeri- cal competence. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 177-190.
[27] Olsson, A., & Ochsner, K. N. (2007). The role of social cognition in emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 65-71.
[28] Pelphrey, K. A., Viola, R. J., & McCarthy, G. (2004). When strangers pass: processing of mutual and averted social gaze in superior temporal sulcus. Psychological Science, 15, 598-603.
[29] Pinel, P., Dehaene, S., Riviere, D., & LeBihan, D. (2001). Modulation of parietal activation by semantic distance in a number comparison task. Neuroimage, 14, 1013-1026.
[30] Pinel, P., Piazza, M., Bihan, D. L., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Distributed and overlapping cerebral representations of number, size, and luminance during comparative judgments. Neuron, 41, 983-993.
[31] Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
[32] Preston, S. D., & de-Waal, F. B. M. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 1-72.
[33] Raizada, R. D. S. et al. (2008). Socioeconomic status predicts hemispheric specialization of the left inferior frontal gyrus in young children. Neuroimage, 40, 1392-1401.
[34] Sapolsky, R. M. (2005). The influence of social hierarchy on primate health. Science, 308, 648-652.
[35] Sawamura, H., Shima, K., & Tanji, J. (2002). Numerical representation for action in the parietal cortex of the monkey. Nature, 415, 918-921.
[36] Schulte-Ruther, M., Markowitsch, H. J., Shah, N. J. et al. (2008). Gen- der differences in brain networks supporting empathy. Neuroimage, 42, 393-403.
[37] Shuman, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). Numerical magnitude in the human parietal lobe: Tests of representational generality and domain specificity. Neuron, 44, 1-20.
[38] Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J. et al. (2006). Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature, 439, 466-469.
[39] Thioux, M., Pesenti, M., Costes, N., Volder, A. D., & Seron, X. (2005). Task independent semantic activation for numbers and animals. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 284-290.
[40] Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 483-488.
[41] Wilson, E. O. (2000). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
[42] Zink, C. F., Tong, Y., Chen, Q. et al. (2008). Know your place: Neural processing of social hierarchy in humans. Neuron, 58, 273-283.