国际会计前沿  >> Vol. 2 No. 3 (September 2013)

会计道德研究回顾与展望
Accounting Ethics Research: Retrospect and Prospect

DOI: 10.12677/FIA.2013.23003, PDF, HTML, XML,  被引量 下载: 4,483  浏览: 16,072  科研立项经费支持

作者: 付宏琳*:南开大学泰达学院,天津

关键词: 会计道德研究道德发展理论道德判断道德行为Accounting Ethics Research; Moral Development Theory; Moral Judgment; Moral Behavior

摘要: 会计、审计人员是资本市场的重要行为主体,其职业判断决定着会计信息质量。近来,众多财务丑闻引发全社会对会计、审计人员道德取向的怀疑,因为弄虚作假首先涉及的是道德问题。本文梳理了会计道德研究,并就未来的研究方向提出了看法和建议。  Moral judgments of accounting professionals affect the quality of financial information, which is one of the keys to the smooth development of the capital market. Recent accounting scandals have raised concerns about the ethical orientations of accountants and auditors because accounting fraud is closely related to ethical problems. This paper reviews the development of theories in moral psychology and related accounting ethics research, and suggests a number of research areas and approaches for conducting accounting ethics research in the future.

文章引用: 付宏琳. 会计道德研究回顾与展望[J]. 国际会计前沿, 2013, 2(3): 23-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/FIA.2013.23003

参考文献

[1] [1] J. R. Rest. Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger, 1986.
[2] S. A. Loeb. Survey of ethical behavior in the accounting pro- fession. Journal of Accounting Research, 1971, 9(2): 287-306.
[3] T. M. Jones. Ethical decision making by individuals in organi- zations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 1991, 16(2): 366-395.
[4] L. Kohlberg. Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In: D. Goslin, Handbook of Socia- lization Theory and Research, Chicago: Rand McNally, 1969.
[5] J. R. Rest. Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1979.
[6] L. Ponemon, D. Gabhart. Ethical reasoning in accounting and auditing. Research Monograph No. 21. Vancouver: CGA-Cana- da Research Foundation, 1993.
[7] M. J. Abdolmohammadi, D. Ariail. A test of the selection-socia- lization theory in moral reasoning of CPAs in industry practice. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 2009, 21(2): 1-12.
[8] C. Windsor, N. Ashkanasy. The effect of client management bar- gaining power, moral reasoning development, and belief in a just world on accountant independence. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1995, 20(7-8): 701-720.
[9] L. Ponemon. Ethical reasoning and selection socialization in accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1992, 17(3-4): 239-258.
[10] L. Thorne. The development of two measures to assess account- tants’ prescriptive and deliberative moral reasoning. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 2000, 12: 139-170.
[11] M. Armstrong. Moral development and accounting education. Journal of Accounting Education, 1987, 5: 27-43.
[12] L. Thorne, M. Magnan. Canadian public accountants’ moral de- velopment and domain specific reasoning. Research on Accoun- ting Ethics, 2000, 7: 177-196.
[13] S. B. Scofield, T. J. Phillips Jr. and C. D. Bailey. An empirical reanalysis of the selection-socialization hypothesis: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2004, 29(5-6): 543-563.
[14] R. A. Bernardi, D. F. Arnold Sr. An examination of moral de- velopment within public accounting by gender, staff level, and firms. Contemporary Accounting Research, 1997, 14(4): 653- 668.
[15] C. Jeffrey, N. Weatherholt. Ethical development, professional commitment, and rule observance attitudes: A study of CPAs and corporate accountants. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 1996, 8: 8-30.
[16] M. J. Abdolmohammadi, W. J. Read, D. P. Scarbrough. Does selection-socialization help to explain accountants’ weak ethical reasoning? Journal of Business Ethics, 2003, 42(1): 71-81.
[17] S. J. Thoma. Examining gender differences in the compre- hension and preference of moral issues. Developmental Review, 1986, 6(2): 165-180.
[18] J. Tsui. Auditors’ ethical reasoning: Some audit conflict and cross cultural evidence. International Journal of Accounting, 1996, 31: 121-133.
[19] J. Lampe, D. Finn. A model of auditors’ ethical decision process. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 1992, 11(Supplement): 33-59.
[20] M. K. Shaub. An analysis of the association of traditional de- mographic variables with the moral reasoning of auditing stu- dents and auditors. Journal of Accounting Education, 1994, 12: 1-26.
[21] J. T. Sweeney. The moral expertise of auditors: An exploratory analysis. Research on Accounting Ethics, 1995, 1: 213-234.
[22] G. Eynon, N. T. Hill and K. T. Stevens. Factors that influence the moral reasoning abilities of accountants: Implications for univer- sities and the profession. Journal of Business Ethics, 1997, 16(9): 1297-1309.
[23] L. A. Ponemon. Ethical judgments in accounting: A cognitive- developmental perspective. Critical Perspectives in Accounting, 1990, 1: 191-215.
[24] L. A. Ponemon. The objectivity of accountants’ litigation sup- port judgments. The Accounting Review, 1995, 70(3): 467-488.
[25] J. R. Rest. The major components of morality. In: W. Kurtines and J. Gewirtz, Eds., Morality, Moral Behavior, and Moral De- velopment, New York: Wiley, 1984.
[26] L. A. Ponemon. Can ethics be taught in accounting? Journal of Accounting Education, 1993, 11(2): 185-209.
[27] J. T. Sweeney, R. W. Roberts. Cognitive moral development and auditor independence. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1997, 22(3-4): 337-352.
[28] M. K. Shaub. An analysis of the association of traditional de- mographic variables with the moral reasoning of auditing stu- dents and auditors. Journal of Accounting Education, 1994, 12 (1): 1-26.
[29] R. A. Bernardi. Fraud detection: The effect of client integrity and competence and auditor cognitive style. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 1994, 13(Supplement): 68-84.
[30] F. Gul, A. Ng and M. Tong. Chinese auditors’ ethical behavior in an audit conflict situation. Journal of Business Ethics, 2003, 42: 379-392.
[31] A. Lord, F. T. DeZoort. The impact of commitment and moral reasoning on accountants’ response to social influence pressures. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2001, 26: 215-235.
[32] N. Uddin, P. R. Gillett. The effects of moral reasoning and self- monitoring on CFO intentions to report fraudulently on financial statements. Journal of Business Ethics, 2002, 40(1): 15-32.
[33] L. A. Ponemon. Auditor underreporting of time and moral rea- sonning: An experimental-lab study. Contemporary Accounting Research, 1992, 9: 171-189.
[34] H. Falk, B. Lynne, S. Mestelman, et al. Auditor independence, self-interested behavior and ethics: Some experimental evidence. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 1999, 18: 395-428.
[35] D. Bay, R. Greenberg. The relationship of the DIT and behavior: A replication. Issues in Accounting Education, 2001, 16(3): 367- 380.
[36] L. K. Trevino. Ethical decision making in organizations: A per- son-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 1986, 11(3): 601-617.
[37] N. Martinov-Bennie, G. Pflugrath. The strength of an accounting firm’s ethical environment and the quality of auditors’ judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 2009, 87(2): 237-253.
[38] A. Ketchand, R. Morris and W. Shafer. An analysis of the role of moral intensity in auditing judgments. Research on Accounting Ethics, 1999, 5: 249-270.
[39] C. D. Bailey, I. Scott and S. J. Thoma. Revitalizing accounting ethics research in the Neo-Kohlbergian framework: Putting the DIT into perspective. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 2010, 22(2): 1-26.
[40] E. N. Johnson, G. M. Fleischman, and S. Valentine, et al. Mana- gers’ ethical evaluations of earnings management and its cones- quences. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2012, 29(3): 910- 927.
[41] R. Antle, B. Nalebuff. Conservatism and auditor-client nego- tiations. Journal of Accounting Research, 1991, 29(Supplement): 31-54.
[42] A. Bandura. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1986.
[43] D. M. Mayer, K. Aquino, R. L. Greenbaum, et al. Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 2012, 55(1): 151-171.