任务经验对学习时间分配策略转移的影响
The Effects of Task Experience on Strategy Shifts in the Allocation of Study Time
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2013.36044, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 2,701  浏览: 8,833  国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 彭 丽, 李伟健, 谢瑞波, 曹 玮：浙江师范大学心理研究所，金华；陈海德：北京师范大学发展心理研究所，北京
关键词: 任务经验；学习时间分配；策略转移；议程；权衡；Task Experience; Study-Time Allocation; Strategy Shift; Agenda; Trade-Off
摘要: 本研究采用Dunlosky范式，以80名大学生为被试，选择困难5分和容易1分两类项目，通过4个试次的学习–测试过程，探讨权衡情境下任务经验对学习时间分配策略转移的影响。结果发现，在有提示和无提示条件下，随着任务经验的增加，被试均更多地重学高测试项目，困难5分组实现策略转移的比例分别为58%和39%，容易1分组实现策略转移的比例分别是20%和18%。结果表明：学习时间分配的权衡决策随着任务经验的增加而变化；然而，大部分被试未能实现策略转移。In this study, we adopted the Dunlosky’s paradigm, took 81 college students as the participants and chose two kinds of item (5-point difficult and 1-point easy item) through four study-test trials to explore the effects of task experience on strategy shifts in the allocation of study time under the trade-off situation. The results found that with the increase of task experience, participants selected more high test item to restudy in 2 experiments, the proportions of the strategy shift in 5-point difficult groups were 58% and 39%, the proportions of the strategy shift in 1-point easy groups were 20% and 18%. Those results indicated that the trade-off decision of study-time allocation changed with the increase of task experience, while most of participants failed to complete the strategy shift.
文章引用：彭丽, 李伟健, 陈海德, 谢瑞波, 曹玮 (2013). 任务经验对学习时间分配策略转移的影响. 心理学进展, 3(6), 292-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2013.36044

参考文献

[1] 陈海德(2011). 项目难度与分值对学习时间分配的影响. 浙江师范大学硕士论文, 金华.
[2] 李伟健, 蔡任娜, 陈海德, 汪磊, 王敏敏(印刷中). 项目难度与分值对自定步调学习时间的影响. 心理科学.
[3] 李伟健, 家晓余, 陈海德, 黄杰, 蔡任娜, 曹玮等(印刷中). 自定步调学习时间的习惯性反应：来自眼动的证据. 心理科学.
[4] 李晓明, 傅小兰(2004). 情绪性权衡困难下的决策行为. 心理科学进展, 12期, 801-808.
[5] 贾宁, 白学军, 臧传丽, 阎国利(2008). 学习时间分配机制的眼动研究. 心理科学, 31期, 93-96.
[6] 牛勇(2006). 权衡困难情境下的学习时间分配决策. 中国科学院博士学位论文, 北京.
[7] Ariel, R., Dunlosky, J., & Bailey, H. (2009). Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: When agendas override item-based monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 432-447.
[8] Ariel, R. (2012). Learning what to learn: The effects of task experience on strategy shifts in the allocation of study time. Kent State University, Kent.
[9] Ariel, R., & Dunlosky, J. (2013). When do learners shift from habitual to agenda-based processes when selecting items for study? Memory & Cognition, 41, 416-428.
[10] Castel, A. D., Murayama, K., Friedman, M. C., McGillivray, S., & Link, I. (2013). Selecting valuable information to remember: Age-Related differences and similarities in self-regulated learning. Psychology and Aging, 28, 232-242.
[11] Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (1998). Training programs to improve learning in later adulthood: Helping older adults educate themselves. In: Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C., Eds., Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 249-275). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
[12] Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (2000). Updating knowledge about encoding strategies: A componential analysis of learning about strategy effectiveness from task experience. Psychology and Aging, 15, 462.
[13] Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (2004). Causes and constraints of the shift-to-easier-materials effect in the control of study. Memory & Cognition, 32, 779-788.
[14] Dunlosky, J., & Ariel, R. (2011). Self-regulated learning and the allocation of study time. In Ross, B. H., Ed., The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 103-140). San Diego: Academic.
[15] Hertzog, C., Price, J., & Dunlosky, J. (2008). How is knowledge generated about memory encoding strategy effectiveness? Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 430-445.
[16] Hertzog, C., Price, J., Burpee, A., Frentzel, W. J., Feldstein, S., & Dunlosky, J. (2009). Why do people show minimal knowledge updating with task experience: Inferential deficit or experimental artifact? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 155-173.
[17] Metcalfe, J. (2002). Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 349.
[18] Metcalfe, J., & Jacobs, W. J. (2010). People’s study time allocation and its relation to animal foraging. Behavioural Processes, 83, 213-221.
[19] Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In: Metcalfe, J., & Shimamura, A. P., Eds., Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 1-25). Cambridge: MIT Press.
[20] Price, J., & Murray, R. G. (2012). The region of proximal learning heuristic and adult age differences in self-regulated learning. Psychology and Aging, 27, 1120.
[21] Thiede, K. T., & Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1024-1037.
[22] Tullis, J. G., & Benjamin, A. S. (2012). The effectiveness of updating metacognitive knowledge in the elderly: Evidence from metamnemonic judgments of word frequency. Psychology and Aging, 27, 683.