AP  >> Vol. 4 No. 11&122.asp; (March 2014)

    自我控制影响诚信行为的机制:调节作用模型
    The Mechanisms of Self-Control Affecting the Honest Behavior: The Moderating Model

  • 全文下载: PDF(501KB) HTML    PP.217-223   DOI: 10.12677/AP.2014.42033  
  • 下载量: 2,318  浏览量: 8,605   国家科技经费支持

作者:  

胡春香:广州大学教育学院,广州;
聂衍刚:广州大学教育学院,广州;广州人心理与行为研究中心,广州

关键词:
自我控制双系统自我控制资源诚信行为调节模型Dual Systems of Self-Control; Self-Control Resource; Honest Behavior; Moderating Model

摘要:

尽管以往研究从多种自我控制理论的角度解释自我控制对诚信行为的影响,但却没有指出具体的影响机制,以及缺乏考虑神经机制和自我控制资源调节变量在其中的作用。为了更系统地解释自我控制影响诚信行为的作用机制,我们从自我控制双系统理论和自我控制资源理论的视角,提出自我控制影响诚信行为的调节作用模型,该模型认为:如果自我控制资源没有受到损耗,即个体有足够的自我控制资源,那么个体可以维持意识层面的个人标准,从而表现出与个人标准相符合的诚信行为;相反,如果自我控制资源损耗会使个体用于维持意识层面的个人标准的资源减少,导致个体无法维持意识层面的个人标准,潜意识层面的冲动就会使个体的自我控制失效,从而导致个体表现出不诚信的行为。未来的研究可以从自我控制影响诚信行为的调节作用模型的视角,采用动态的认知神经研究方法,探讨自我控制影响诚信行为的心理和神经机制。

Although previous studies try to explain the influence between self-control and the honest behavior from a variety perspective of the theory of self-control, but it does not indicate the specific mechanisms of the influence, and it lacks consideration of the role of neural mechanisms and resources which is the manipulated variable. In order to explain the mechanism of self-control affecting the honest behavior more systematically, we put forward the moderating model of self- control affecting the honest behavior from the perspective of the theory of dual systems of self-control and the theory of self-control resource, which is that: if the resource of self-control is not depleted, individuals can maintain the personal standards in the level of consciousness, because they have sufficient self-control resource, and demonstrate the honest behavior consistent with their personal standards; Conversely, if the self-control resource of individual is depleted, which will be used to maintain the personal standards in the level of consciousness, as a result, individuals are unable to maintain the individual standards in the level of consciousness, and the impulses in the subconscious level will make the individual's self-control failure, and show bad faith conduct. Future research could use the methods of dynamic cognitive neuroscience to explore the psychological and neural mechanisms of self-control affecting the honest behavior from the perspective of the moderating between double systems of self-control and self-control resource.

文章引用:
胡春香, 聂衍刚. 自我控制影响诚信行为的机制:调节作用模型[J]. 心理学进展, 2014, 4(11&12): 217-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2014.42033

参考文献

[1] 陈劲(2007). 中国人诚信心理结构及其特征. 博士论文, 重庆: 西南大学.
[2] 崔茜, 张庆林, 邱江, 刘强, 杜秀敏, 阮小林(2009). P300和CNV在GKT的延时反应范式中测谎效果的分离. 心理学报, 4期, 316-328.
[3] 蒋奖(2004). 父母教养方式与青少年行为问题关系的研究. 健康心理学杂志, 1期, 72-74.
[4] 黎建斌(2013). 自我控制资源与认知资源相互影响的机制: 整合模型. 心理科学进展, 2期, 235-242.
[5] 黎建斌, 聂衍刚, 曾敏霞, 窦凯(2012). 自我控制失败的心理因素、神经表达及交互作用刍议. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 4期, 44-50.
[6] 刘霞, 范兴华, 申继亮(2007). 初中留守儿童社会支持与问题行为的关系. 心理发展与教育, 3期, 98-102.
[7] 聂衍刚, 黎建斌, 林小彤, 周虹(2011). 中职学生自我意识与诚信态度的关系. 教育研究与实验, 1期, 87-91.
[8] 宋玲, 吴继霞(2009). 诚信的心理机制探析. 牡丹江师范学院学报(哲社版), 1期, 111-113.
[9] 吴继霞, 黄希庭(2012). 诚信结构初探. 心理学报, 3期, 354-367.
[10] 吴继霞(2009). 诚信品格的养成. 合肥: 安徽教育出版社, 10, 37, 74 76, 285, 319.
[11] 吴慧红(2005). 道德研究新视角: 道德判断测验的理论和实证研究. 硕士论文, 南京: 南京师范大学.
[12] 徐芬, 王卫星, 张文静(2005). 幼儿说谎行为的特点及其与心理理论水平的关系. 心理学报, 1期, 73-78.
[13] 叶婷, 吴慧婷(2012). 低家庭社会经济地位与青少年社会适应的关系: 感恩的补偿和调节效应. 心理学探新, 1期, 61
[14] 66.
[15] 曾敏霞(2012). 青少年道德自我概念与诚信行为关系的实证研究. 硕士论文, 广州: 广州大学.
[16] 曾敏霞, 黎建斌, 聂衍刚(2012). 诚信行为: 心理学的解释. 心理学进展, 2期, 65-71.
[17] 赵爱玲(2004). 国内诚信研究综述. 道德与文明, 1期, 68-71 .
[18] 周亮, 杨文俊, 廖四照, 邹海强(1999). P300用于模拟盗窃测谎的实验性研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 1期, 34-36.
[19] 周亮, 杨文俊, 廖四照, 邹海强(2000). 模拟盗窃者与熟悉现场者在测谎实验中事件相关电位的比较研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2期, 86-88.
[20] 赵子真, 吴继霞, 吕倩倩, 李世娟(2009). 诚信人格特质初探. 心理科学, 3期, 626-629.
[21] Ashton, M.C., & Lee, K. (2005). Honesty humility, the big five, and the five factors model. Journal of Personality, 73, 1321
[22] 1353.
[23] Ashton, M.C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., De Vries, R.E., Di Blas, L., Boies, K., & De Raad, B. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356-366.
[24] Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
[25] Baumeister, B.F., Vohs, K.D., & Tice, D.M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 351-356.
[26] Carver, C.S., & Scheier, M.F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19-35.
[27] Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[28] Friese, M., & Hofmann, W. (2009). Control me or I will control you: Impulse, trait self-control, and the guidance of behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 795-805.
[29] Fang, F., Yitao, L., & Zheng, S. (2003). Lie detection with contingent negative variation. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 50, 247-255.
[30] Heyman, G.D., Hsu, A.S., Fu, G., & Lee, K. (2012). Instrumental lying by parents in the US and China. International Journal of Psychology, on line publication first.
[31] Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Strack, F. (2011). Impulse and self-control from a dual-system perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 162-176.
[32] Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B.J., & Baddeley, D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Science, 16, 174-180.
[33] Li, J.B., Nie, Y.G., Zeng, M.X., Huntoon, M., & Smith, J.L. (In press). Too exhausted to remember: Ego depletion undermines subsequent event-based prospective memory. International Journal of Psychology, on line publication first.
[34] Lind, G. (2000). The importance of role-taking opportunities for self-sustaining moral development. Journal of Research in Education, 10, 9-15.
[35] Matthews, K.A., & Gallo, L.C. (2010). Psychological perspectives on pathways linking socioeconomic status and physical health. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 501-530.
[36] McLeod, B.A., & Genereux, R.L. (2008). Predicting the acceptability and likelihood of lying: The interaction of personality with type of lie. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 591-596.
[37] Rosenfeld, J.P., Nasman, V.T., Whalen, R., Canrwell, B., & Mazzeri, L. (1987). Late vertex positivity in event-related potentials as a guilty knowledge indicator: A new method of lie detection. International Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 125
[38] 129.
[39] Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S.D., Darling, N., Mounts, N.S., & Dombusch, S.M. (1994). Over-time changes in adjustment and competence among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Development, 65, 754-770.
[40] Tangney, J.P., Baumeister, R.F., & Boone, A.L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271-322.
[41] Vahid, A., Mohammad, H.M., & Mohammad, A.K. (2009). A new approach for EEG feature extraction in P300-based lie detection. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 94, 48-57.