好下属的人格特征及与领导信任的关系分析
The Study on Relationship between Good Subordinate’s Personality Characteristics and Leader’s Trust in Good Subordinate
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2014.45094, PDF, HTML, 下载: 2,802  浏览: 11,233 
作者: 张妍萃:天津农学院人文学院,天津
关键词: 好下属人格领导信任Good Subordinate Personality Leader Trust
摘要: 通过对天津市5家企业的295名领导者进行问卷调查,探讨好下属的人格特征、领导者对好下属的信任状况,并进一步分析好下属的人格特征与领导信任的关系。结果发现:1) 领导对于好下属的人格要求较高,重要性分为具有显著差异的三个层次:处事态度、外向性和才干;人际关系、善良和行事风格;情绪性。2) 领导对好下属的信任中等偏上,且认知信任显著大于情感信任。不同领导者对好下属的信任不存在显著差异。3) 好下属的人格特征与领导对其的总体信任存在显著相关。好下属的行事风格、善良和处事态度与领导的信任存在显著的多重线性关系,可以解释变异程度的43%。好下属的行事风格、善良与外向性与领导的认知信任存在显著的多重线性关系,可以解释变异程度的53%。好下属的处事态度和行事风格与领导的情感信任存在显著的多重线性关系,可以解释变异程度的24%。
Abstract: The survey is implemented in 5 organizations in Tianjin. The total sample comprised 295 leaders. This article is to explore the relationship between good subordinate’s personality characteristics and leader’s trust in good subordinate. The research conclusion involves several aspects as follows: 1) Leaders have higher request for personality characteristics of good subordinate. There are three remarkable levels by importance: attitude of doing things, extraversion, and talent; Interpersonal relationship, kind-hearted, and act style; emotion. 2) The level of leader’s trust in good subordinate is above average and the cognitive trust is significantly higher than emotional trust. There is no significant difference among different leaders about their trust in good subordinates. 3) Good subordinate’s personality characteristics have significant correlation with leader’s trust in good subordinate. Act style, kind-hearted, and attitude of doing things have significant multiple linear relationships with trust and explain 43% of the variability. Act style, kind-hearted, and extraversion have significant multiple linear relationships with cognitive trust and explain 53% of the variability. Attitude of doing things and act style have significant multiple linear relationships with motional trust and explain 24% of the variability.
文章引用:张妍萃 (2014). 好下属的人格特征及与领导信任的关系分析. 心理学进展, 4(5), 708-714. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2014.45094

参考文献

[1] 贾淑芳(2009). 大学生网络交往对现实交往中的际关系、人际信任、人格的影响研究. 山东师范大学学报, 54期, 69-75.
[2] 李爱梅, 谭清方, 杨慧琳(2012). “领导与下属双向信任”的形成及其作用机制研究. 暨南学报, 2期,73-79.
[3] 马力, 曲庆(2007). 可能的阴暗面: 领导——成员交换和关系对组织公平的影响. 管理世界, 11期, 87-95.
[4] 彭聃龄(2007). 普通心理学. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.
[5] 王登峰, 崔红(2003). 中国人人格量表(QZPS)的编制过程与初步结果. 心理学报, 35期, 127-136.
[6] 徐芬, 李欢, 马凤玲(2011). 大学生信任倾向与人格特质的关系. 应用心理学, 17期, 202-211.
[7] 郑伯(1999). 企业组织中上下属的信任关系. 社会学研究, 2期, 22-37.
[8] Alsajjan, B. A. (2010). How the big five personality dimensions influence customers trust in UK cellular pro-viders? International Journal of Global Business, 3, 102-116.
[9] Barrick, M. R, Parks, L., & Mount, M. K. (2005). Self-Monitoring as a moderator of the relationships between personality traits and performance. Personnel Psychology, 58, 745-767.
[10] Brockner, J., Siegel, P. A., Daly, J. P., et al. (1997). When trust matters: The moderating effect of outcome favorability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 3, 558-583.
[11] Chua, R. Y. J., Paul, I., & Morris, M. (2008). From the head and the heart: Locating cognition-and affect-based trust in manager’s professional networks. Academy Of Management Journal, 51,436-452.
[12] Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63, 967-985.
[13] Mayer, R.C., Schoorman, F. D., & Davis, J. H. (1995). An integrative model of organization trust. Academy of Management Review, 3, 709-734.
[14] McAllister, D.J. (1995). Affect and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24-59.