迭部扎尕那林区乔木林景观斑块分形分析
Fractal Analysis on Arbor Forest Landscape of Zha Gana Forest Area in Diebu County
DOI: 10.12677/IJE.2014.34010, PDF, HTML, 下载: 2,630  浏览: 7,918  国家科技经费支持
作者: 齐国翠, 赵士波:兰州交通大学,环境与市政工程学院,兰州;汤萃文:中国科学院寒区旱区环境与市政工程研究所,冻土工程国家重点实验室,兰州
关键词: 森林景观乔木林分形分析迭部扎尕那Forest Landscape Arbor Forest Fractal Analysis Diebu Zha Gana
摘要: 在GIS技术的支持下,利用林相图及相关调查资料,采用周长-面积关系的算法对迭部扎尕那林区乔木林景观进行了分形分析。结果表明:1) 乔木林景观类型以针叶林为主,冷杉林面积占乔木林总面积的50.1%,且平均斑块面积较大,分布较为集中完整,是该林区的优势林种。云杉林平均斑块面积水平相对较低,分布较为分散,破碎化程度较高。阔叶林分布面积只占乔木林总面积的9.9%。红桦林是阔叶林中面积最大,分布较为集中的类型。2) 乔木林各林种斑块分维值整体较为接近,介于1.1~1.3之间,说明7种森林类型的斑块边界形状复杂程度相当。不同林种景观斑块分维值大小排列顺序为红桦 < 白桦 < 油松 < 针阔混交 < 针叶混交 < 云杉 < 冷杉。其中阔叶林分维值在1.10~1.15之间,混交林在1.23~1.25之间,针叶林在1.25~1.27之间,基本呈现出面积分布越广、海拔分布范围越高的类型分维数也越高的趋势,一定程度上反映出农田对植被的破坏程度较大。阔叶林中分布面积最大的红桦林分维数最低。3) 扎尕那林区占整个林区乔木林总面积90%的云冷杉林及混交林种基本上是近成过熟林。年龄结构计算的分维数值各龄组之间差别较大。近成过熟白桦林和中龄针阔混交林的分维数接近1.5,斑块形状复杂,且目前处于不稳定状态。中龄红桦林分维值接近1,分布形状最为规则单一,是受农田破坏最大的类型。
Abstract: With the help of GIS technology, the algorithm about the relation of perimeter-area was used to do the fractal analysis of arbor landscape based on the forest map and survey data of Zha Gana Forest in Diebu. The results showed that 1) the type of arbor landscape was dominated by coniferous forest. The area of fir forest accounted for 50.1 percent of the total area of arbor, and its mean patch area was much larger with the centralized and complete distribution. So the fir was superior forest in arbor forest. The level of mean patch area of Picea asperata was relatively low with dispersed distribution and a higher degree of fragmentation. 2) At the whole level, the fractal dimension for each forest was very close, ranging from 1.1 - 1.3. It explained that the shape complexity of seven species of arbor landscape patches were same. The sequence of fractal dimension for different forest landscape patches is Betula albo-sinensis < Betula platyphylla < Pinus tabuliformis < mixed broadleaf-conifer forest < coniferous mixed forest < Picea asperata < Fir. The fractal dimension for the broad-leaved forest ranged from 1.10 - 1.15; the mingled forest ranged from 1.23 - 1.25; and the aciculiailvae ranged from 1.25 - 1.27. There appears a tendency that the wider area and the higher altitude, the higher fractal dimension will be. To a certain extent, it reflected a higher level of destruction of farmland to vegetation. The fractal dimension for Betula albo-sinensis was minimum, which was the biggest distribution area among broad-leaved forest. 3) Accounted for 90 percent of total area of whole arbor forest in Zha Gana Forest, the species of Picea asperata, Fir and mingled forest were essentially mature or over-mature forest. The fractal dimension calculated by age structure was different among various age groups. The fractal dimension for mature or over-mature Betula platyphylla and mid-aged mixed broadleaf-conifer forest was close to 1.5. The shapes of patches were complex and in an unstable state. The fractal dimension for middle- aged Betula albo-sinensis was close to 1. The distribution shape was the most regular and single one; it was the type that suffered the farmland destruction most.
文章引用:齐国翠, 汤萃文, 赵士波. 迭部扎尕那林区乔木林景观斑块分形分析[J]. 世界生态学, 2014, 3(4): 64-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/IJE.2014.34010

参考文献

[1] 肖笃宁, 李秀这, 高俊, 等 (2003) 景观生态学. 中国林业出版社, 北京.
[2] 李斌, 张金屯 (2010) 黄土高原灌丛景观斑块形状的指数和分形分析. 中国农学通报, 2, 141-147.
[3] Forman, R.T.T. (1995) Land mosaics: The ecology of landscape and region. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[4] 张丽珍, 张芸香, 郭晋平 (2003) 次生林区斑块形状动态与森林恢复过程分析. 生态学杂志, 2, 16-19.
[5] 邬建国 (2000) 景观生态学—格局、过程、尺度及等级. 高等教育出版社, 北京.
[6] 李斌, 张金屯 (2010) 黄土高原草原景观斑块形状的指数和分形分析. 草地学报, 2, 141-147.
[7] 邬建国 (2004) 景观生态学. 高等教育出版社, 北京.
[8] 杨珍珍, 白淼源 (2010) 基于GIS的大兴安岭呼中森林景观格局分析. 东北林业大学学报, 9, 40-43.
[9] 沈永平, 等 (2010) 甘肃省迭部县扎尕那景区冰川地貌考查及开发保护规划. 甘肃.
[10] 史利莎, 彭莹, 黄璐, 等 (2012) 甘肃省迭部县扎尕那生态人居多层次景观空间解构. 地理科学, 4, 485-491.
[11] 郭晋平 (2001) 森林景观生态研究. 北京大学出版社, 北京.
[12] Frohn, R.C. (1998) Remote sensing for landscape ecology: New metric indicators for monitoring, modeling, and assessment of ecosystems. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton.
[13] 常学礼, 邬建国 (1996) 分形模型在生态学研究中的应用. 生态学杂志, 3, 35-42.
[14] 徐建华 (2002) 现代地理学中的数学方法. 高等教育出版社, 北京.
[15] 汤萃文, 杨国靖, 任珺, 苏研科, 肖笃宁 (2010) 石羊河、黑河流域上游山地景观格局特征比较. 冰川冻土, 5, 1007-1014.
[16] 汤萃文, 张海风, 陈银萍, 姚雪玲, 王丽娟, 肖笃宁 (2009) 祁连山南坡植被景观格局及其破碎化. 生态学杂志, 11, 2305-2310.
[17] 付春风, 张贵 (2006) 广州市白云区森林景观镶嵌结构的分析分析. 湖南林业科技, 3, 22-24.
[18] 刘灿然, 陈灵芝 (2000) 北京地区植被景观斑块形状的分析分析. 植物生态学报, 2, 129-134.