社会科学前沿  >> Vol. 3 No. 4 (December 2014)

价值演进公共空间与服务满意度评量方法—以公共图书馆为例
The Changing Value of Public Spaces and Satisfaction Measurement—Public Library

DOI: 10.12677/ASS.2014.34012, PDF, HTML, 下载: 2,027  浏览: 5,768  国家自然科学基金支持

作者: 李 智:国立中山大学,高雄

关键词: 公共空间社会资本人物志参与观察服务科学Public Spaces Social Capital PersonaParticipation Observation Service Science

摘要: 融合知性、美学、文化、休憩,与教育等多元公共空间肩负起建立社会资本群内认同、群外延伸与异阶联系三大关系实现载具,然仍有为数不少之公共空间因疏于与在地文化需求相结合而利用率偏低,服务提供者应如何动态掌握服务用户需求变化进行空间规划与活动安排,避免公共投资浪费,至关重要。本文提出服务价值论述辩证程序,尽可能地减少盲点,并以公共图书馆为例,建议一套客观科学方法使用者满意度搜集与评量机制,持续保有公共空间之资源价值,积极提高利用率,以减轻社会大众于型态变迁过程中所带来之种种压力。
Abstract: The public spaces, as the carriers, combine with intellectual, aesthetic, cultural, recreational, and educational ingredients to realize the social capital relationships including the bondage, the bridge, and the linkage. However, there are still a number of public spaces under low utilization; how the service providers are able to capture the needs from the users dynamically to plan the spaces and the activities appropriately are essential to avoid the possibility of low return of the public investment. This paper presents a rebuttal process against the planning of the spaces and the activities to reduce the blind spots as possible. It also takes the public libraries as examples to suggest an objective scientific approach to collect user service-experienced data to measure their satisfaction, so that the public spaces can maintain and derive new social resource value by in-creasing the facilities usage, eventually alleviate the pressure from the process during the society migration brought to the citizens.

文章引用: 李智. 价值演进公共空间与服务满意度评量方法—以公共图书馆为例[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2014, 3(4): 91-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2014.34012

参考文献

[1] 章英华, 杜素豪, 廖培珊 (2012) 台湾社会变迁基本调查计画. 中央研究院社会学研究所, 台北.
[2] Keeley, B. (2007) Human capital: How what you know shapes your life. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.
[3] Liu, L.-W. and Ko, P.-Y. (2013) Imagination and practice of collaborative landscape, ecological, and cultural planning in Taiwan: The case of Taichung County and Changhua County. Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development: Approaches for Achieving Sustainable Urban Form in Asian Cities, 117-133.
[4] Ijla, A.M. (2012) Does public space create social capital? International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 4, 48-53.
[5] 邢志航 (2010) 閒置及低度利用公共设施形成因素构面及活化困境之研究. 第十四届国土规划论坛, 台南.
[6] Loke, L., Robertson, T. and Mansfield, T. (2005) Moving bodies, social selves: Movement-oriented personas and scenarios. In: Proceedings of the 17th Australia conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Citizens Online: Considerations for Today and the Future, Canberra, 21-25 November 2005, 1-10.
[7] Robinson, L. and Schulz, J. (2011) New fieldsites, new methods: New ethnographic opportunities. In: The Handbook of Emergent Technologies in Social Research, Oxford University Press USA, New York, 180-198.
[8] DeWalt, K.M. and DeWalt, B.R. (2010) Participant observation: A guide for fieldworkers. 2nd Edition, Rowman AltaMira Press, Lanham, MD.
[9] 张保隆, 谢宝煖 (1994) 公共图书馆服务品质评估之研究. 图书馆学刊(台大), 10, 85-114.
[10] 王居卿 (1997) 提升图书馆服务品质之策略性作法——系统的观点. 图书馆管理学报, 3, 23-38.
[11] 曾淑贤 (2011) 国内外公共图书馆建筑及空间改善之探讨. 台湾图书馆管理季刊, 4, 8-29.
[12] Ercan, Z.A. (2007) Public spaces of post-industrial cities and their changing roles. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 24, 115-137.
[13] Bélanger, H. (2007) Public spaces in gentrifying neighbourhoods: Conflicting meanings? In: ENHR Sustainable Urban Areas, European Network for Housing Research, Rotterdam, 1-13.
[14] Funk, M., Le, D. and Hu, J. (2013) Feel connected with social actors in public spaces. Workshop on Computers as Social Actors, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1119, 21-33.