原型启发思维能力与蔡格尼克效应以及创造性倾向的关系
The Relation between Creative Thinking Ability in Prototype Elicitation, Zeigarnik Effect and Creative Personality
摘要: 以20个科学发明创造问题为实验材料，采用“测试10个问题–学习10个问题”以及“测试–回忆”两个阶段的实验范式，考察原型启发中启发思维能力(高、低原型启发思维能力)与蔡格尼克效应以及创造性倾向的关系，结果发现：1) 蔡格尼克效应差异显著，原型启发思维能力强的被试蔡格尼克效应更明显；2) 解决科学问题时，有原型材料的情况下出现了原型启发效应，且原型启发思维能力与创造性倾向是相关的；3) 人格中的创造性倾向会影响到个体对于科学发明创造问题的敏感性，创造性倾向越高的被试敏感性越高，问题解决的正确率也越高。
Abstract: Based on the “prototype elicitation” theory, the goal of the research was to examine whether a re-lation exists between the Zeigarnik effect and creative thinking ability in prototype elicitation. This study selected 20 scientific inventions-creations problems as the material and adopted the “10 vs 10” learning and testing experimental paradigm as well as “testing-recalling” experimental paradigm. The result showed that: 1) the Zeigarnik effect is more evident for participants with high creative thinking ability than the low ones; 2) the creative personality will affect people’s sensitivity for creative problems, and the one with high sensitivity can solve more problems; 3) prototype elicitation effect occurred when heuristic information was offered in creative problem solving.
文章引用：郭亚男 (2015). 原型启发思维能力与蔡格尼克效应以及创造性倾向的关系. 心理学进展, 5(4), 145-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2015.54034

参考文献

[1] 曹贵康(2006). 顿悟问题解决的原型事件激活:自动还是控制. 心理科学, 5期, 1123-1127.
[2] 李小平, 张庆林, 等(2005). 中学生创造性倾向发展的初步测试. 西南师范大学学报: 人文社会科学版, 6期, 65-68.
[3] 任国防(2005). 顿悟: 是进程监控还是表征转换. 硕士论文, 重庆: 西南师范大学.
[4] 唐晓晨, 庞娇艳, 罗劲(2009). 顿悟中的蔡格尼克效应: 左右脑在解题失败与提示信息加工时的活动差异. 科学通报, 22期, 3464-3474.
[5] 王立永, 李小平, 等(2006). 大学生创造性倾向特点的研究. 高校保健医学研究与实践, 3期, 14-17.
[6] 吴真真, 邱江, 张庆林(2008). 顿悟的原型启发效应机制探索. 心理发展与教育, 1期, 31-35.
[7] 叶浩生(1998). 西方心理学的历史与体系. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 441.
[8] 张丽华, 白学军, 等(2008). 创造性思维与分心抑制能力关系的汉字负启动效应实验研究. 心理科学, 3期, 638-641.
[9] 张庆林, Sternberg. R. J. (2002). 创造性研究手册. 成都: 四川教育出版社, 76-78, 320-321.
[10] 张庆林(1989). 顿悟心理机制的实验分析. 心理学杂志, 2期, 23-28.
[11] 张庆林, 邱江(2005). 顿悟与原型中启发信息的激活. 心理科学, 1期, 6-9.
[12] 张庆林, 邱江, 曹贵康(2004). 顿悟认知机制的研究述评与理论构想. 心理科学, 6期, 1435-1437.
[13] Chronicle, E. P., MacGregor, J. N., & Ormerod, T. C. (2004). What makes an insight problem? The roles of heuristics, goal conception, and solution recoding in knowledge lean problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 14-27.
[14] Hanfmann, E. (1946). Productive thinking. The Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 41, 368-371.
[15] Kaplan, C. A., & Simon, H. A. (1990). In search of insight. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 374-419.
[16] Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., & Raney, G. E. (2001). An eye movement study of insight problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 29, 1000-1009.
[17] Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., Haider, H., & Rhenius, D. (1999). Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 1534-1555.
[18] Kohler, W. (1925). The mentality of apes. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[19] Luchins, A. S., & Luchins, E. H. (1950). New experimental attempts at preventing mechanization in problem solving. Journal of General Psychology, 42, 279-297.
[20] MacGregor, J. N., Ormerod, T. C., & Chronicle, E. P. (2001). Information processing and insight: A process model of performance on the nine-dot and related problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 176-201.
[21] Mayer, R. E. (1995). The search of insight: Grappling with Gestalt psychology’s unanswered questions. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The Nature of Insight (pp. 33-62). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[22] Ohlsson, S. (1992). Information-processing explanations of insight and related phenomena. In K. J. Gilhooley (Ed.), Advances in the Psychology of Thinking (pp. 1-44). London: Harve-ster-Wheatsheaf.
[23] Smith, S. M. (1995). Getting into and out of mental ruts: A theory of fixation, incubation, and insight. In The Nature of Insight (pp. 229-251). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
[24] Sternberg, R. J., Amabile, T. M., Lubart, T. I. et al. (1999). Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press, 96.
[25] Wertheimer, M. (1959). Productive thinking. New York: Harper.
[26] Zeigarnik, B. (1927). Uber das Behalten von erledigten und unerledigten Handlungen. Psychologische Forschung, 9, 1-85.