放牧绵羊补饲复合预混料应用效果研究
Application Effect of Feeding Grazing Sheep with Compound Premix
DOI: 10.12677/HJAS.2015.52009, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 2,434  浏览: 8,183  科研立项经费支持
作者: 王 博, 张文举, 梁 静:石河子大学动物科技学院,新疆 石河子
关键词: 复合预混料放牧绵羊血液指标生产性能补饲Compound Premix Grazing Sheep Blood Parameters Performance Supplementary Feeding
摘要: 本研究旨在验证放牧绵羊补饲复合预混料的应用效果,研究选取10月龄新疆细毛羊36只,按补饲情况将绵羊分为三个不同处理组,分为对照组、试验组1、试验组2,每日补饲量分别为0、500 g、500 g,补饲复合预混料为0%、0%、2%,分别于正饲期20天和40天进行称重,记录增重,于45天时进行采血,分离保留血清,测定血液指标,并选取绵羊进行屠宰,记录屠宰指标。实验结果表明,补饲复合预混料增重效果明显,试验组2比对照组增重13.41%,差异显著(P < 0.05)试验2组与试验1组相比,差异极显著(P < 0.01),试验2组比试验1组增重提高1倍;屠宰后,胴体重明显有升高趋势,对照组、试验组1与试验组2显著(P < 0.05),试验组血蛋白含量高于对照组,试验组1与对照组对比血钙含量差异极显著(P < 0.05),试验组2与对照组对比血钙含量差异极显著(P < 0.05),试验组2与试验组1差异极显著(P < 0.01);血磷含量对照组与试验组1相对比差异不显著(P > 0.05);对照组与试验组2对比差异极显著(P < 0.01);试验组1与试验组2对比差异显著(P < 0.05);对照组血糖浓度较试验组1和试验组2均为差异极显著(P < 0.01);试验组1和试验组2对比差异显著(0.01 < P < 0.05);对比发现IGg对照组与试验组1差异不显著(P > 0.05),对照组与试验组2相比较差异显著(P < 0.05),研究结果表明补饲复合预混料能够改善放牧绵羊生产性能和提高其免疫性能。
Abstract: This study aimed to verify the effect of feeding premix application on grazing sheep so we selected 36 10-month-old Xinjiang fine-wool sheep. Through feeding situation the sheep were divided into three different treatment groups including the control group, the test group 1 and the test group 2. Daily feeding amount was 0 g, 500 g, 500 g and feeding premix was 0%, 0%, 2%. The sheep were weighed at regular feeding time, namely the 20th day and 40th day and weight gains were recorded. Blood samples were collected at the 45th day, serum was separated and retained and blood parameters were determined. And we selected the sheep to be slaughtered and recorded slaughter index. Experimental results showed that the effect of supplement premix on weight gain was obvious, the weight gain of test group 2 was 13.41% higher than of control group and this was sig-nificantly different (P < 0.05), and through test group 2 compared with test group 1, the difference was significant (P < 0.01) and weight gain of test group 2 was increased by 1 than test group 1. And after slaughtered, the sheep’s carcass weight tended to increase significantly and that of control group, test group 1 and test group 2 was significantly different (P < 0.05). Blood protein content of two test groups was higher than control group and by a comparison of the content of blood calcium between test group 1 and control group the difference was significant (P < 0.05). By a comparison of the content of blood calcium between test group 2 and control group the difference was significant (P < 0.05) and by a comparison of the content of blood calcium between two test groups the difference was significant (P < 0.01). By a comparison of the content of hyperphosphatemia between test group 1 and control group the difference was not significant (P > 0.05). By a comparison of the content of hyperphosphatemia between test group 1 and control group the difference was not significant (P > 0.05). By a comparison of the content of hyperphosphatemia between test group 2 and control group the difference was significant (P < 0.01). By a comparison of the content of hyperphosphatemia between two test groups the difference was significant (P < 0.05). By a comparison of the concentration of blood glucose between test group 1 or test group 2 and control group the difference was significant (P < 0.01). By a comparison of the concentration of blood glu-cose between two test groups the difference was significant (0.01 < P < 0.05). By a comparison of the content of IGg between test group 1 and control group the difference was not significant (P > 0.05). By a comparison of the content of IGg between test group 2 and control group, the difference was significant (P < 0.05). The results showed that supplementation of premix could improve per-formance and enhance immune properties of grazing sheep.
文章引用:王博, 张文举, 梁静. 放牧绵羊补饲复合预混料应用效果研究[J]. 农业科学, 2015, 5(2): 57-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/HJAS.2015.52009

参考文献

[1] 卢德勋, 胡红莲, 等 (2005) 不同放牧时期放牧绵羊营养限制因素及冬季优化补饲的研究. 硕士学位论文, 内蒙古农业大学, 呼和浩特.
[2] 郭强, 殷国梅, 赵和平, 等 (2011) 放牧绵羊牧食行为及采食量研究. 中国草地学报, 4, 95-98.
[3] 李瑞鑫, 王建洲, 李龙, 王宏辉, 等 (2010) 藏北高寒地区放牧藏绵羊采食与消化率的研究. 畜牧与兽医, 4, 51- 54.
[4] 刘福元, 陈玉林, 杨玉福, 等 (2009) 放牧绵羊微量元素摄入量与季节变化的关系研究. 草业科学, 11, 113-117.
[5] 孙国君, 谭守仁, 高彦云, 等 (2001) 羔羊饲料添加剂预混料的配置与饲喂试验. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 9, 17.
[6] 李莎燕, 苏丽萍, 等 (2008) 青海半细毛母羊补饲料中添加预混料的试验. 饲料研究, 9, 59-61.
[7] 冯昕伟, 张力, 郑中朝, 等 (2005) 青海海南不同季节牧场放牧绵羊采食量与消化率的研究. 中国草食动物, 5, 18-19.
[8] 耿明, 哈哈尔曼•胡尔班, 安沙州, 等 (2013) 细毛羊放牧春秋季采食量的差异研究. 新疆农业科学, 7, 1340-1346.
[9] 何长芳, 韩增祥 (2001) 青海高寒地区羊复合预混料的开发利用. 青海科技, 4, 38-39.
[10] 哈尔•阿力, 白富本, 刘宁, 张美芳 (1996) 放牧绵羊补饲矿物元素添加剂对增重和羊毛生长的影响. 中国畜牧杂志, 6, 41-42.
[11] 何孝德, 文香, 马文华 (2003) 复合预混料对成年羯羊育肥效果分析. 青海草业, 1, 8-9.
[12] 王志有 (2002) 复合预混料对育肥羊增重效果的试验. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 6, 14-15.
[13] 于福清, 文杰, 陈继兰 (2001) 矿物质元素对肉品质的影响. 国外畜牧科技, 4, 42-43.
[14] 董文娟, 何永涛, 等 (2006) 补饲维生素D3对羊肉品质的影响. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 3, 90-91.
[15] 韩增祥 (2000) 高寒地区补饲复合预混料对放牧绵羊的效果. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 9, 16-17.
[16] 柳文祖 (2009) 两种复合预混料饲喂育肥羊对比. 青海农牧业, 3, 39-40.
[17] 史可琳 (2004) 添加复合预混料短期育肥绵羊. 青海畜牧兽医杂志, 4, 14-15.
[18] 张明海, 雷样前, 董平样 (2002) 补饲复合营养舔块对幼龄绒山羊生产性能的影响. 中国饲料, 13, 10-11.
[19] 王安, 单安山 (2003) 微量元素与动物生产. 黑龙江科学技术出版社, 哈尔滨, 119.
[20] 张金合 (2008) 放牧与圈养山羊瘤胃内环境及血液生理生化指标的比较分析. 硕士学位论文, 内蒙古农业大学, 呼和浩特.
[21] 李建国, 芦春莲, 曹洪战, 等 (2003) 高剂量锌对奶牛生产性能和血液指标的影响研究. 畜牧兽医学报, 5, 438- 441.
[22] 姚华, 乔富强, 等 (2002) 微量元素对动物机体免疫功能的影响. 动物科学与动物学, 7, 24-26.
[23] 李敬玺, 赵坤, 等 (2007) 不同锌源高锌日粮对肉羊血液指标和免疫功能的影响. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 3, 303-307.
[24] 王平, 杨维仁, 等 (2011) 不同水平维生素A对妊娠后期济宁青山羊血液指标及初生羔羊血液指标及生产性能的影响. 动物营养学报, 1, 66-72.