视听阈下说服对消费行为的影响
The Influence of Visual-Auditory Subliminal Persuasion on Consumer Behavior
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2015.54036, PDF, HTML, XML,  被引量 下载: 2,826  浏览: 8,651 
作者: 唐金玉, 汤永隆, 陈思瑶：西南大学心理学部，重庆
关键词: 视听通道；阈下说服；消费行为；Visual-Auditory Modality； Subliminal Persuasion； Consumer Behavior
摘要: 为探求视听通道的阈下说服对消费行为的影响，本研究采用2 × 2被试间设计对68名大学生进行了实验研究。结果表明：1) 在对品牌态度的影响上，听觉刺激对耐克品牌鞋子质量的评价的主效应显著(F = 6.739, p = 0.012)，无听觉刺激的被试对耐克品牌鞋子质量的评价高于有听觉刺激的被试；视觉刺激与听觉刺激对被试最喜欢的运动品牌这一因变量的交互作用显著(F = 6.283, p = 0.016)，进一步单纯主效应分析发现，在没有视觉刺激的条件下，有听觉刺激的被试最喜欢的运动品牌是耐克的比率低于无听觉刺激的被试；2) 在对消费需求的影响上，视觉刺激与听觉刺激对“我希望自己有更多鞋子”这一因变量的交互作用显著(F = 4.672, p = 0.034)，进一步单纯主效应分析发现，在没有听觉刺激的条件下，有视觉刺激的被试希望自己有更多鞋子的意愿高于无视觉刺激的被试。我们由此得出：视听阈下说服对品牌态度和消费需求产生了影响。
Abstract: The present study tried to explore the influence of visual-auditory subliminal persuasion on con-sumer behavior. A 2 × 2 between-subjects experiment with 68 participants was conducted. Results: 1) In the influence on brand attitude, main effect of auditory stimuli on “I believe Nike shoes are of good quality” was significant (F = 6.739, p = 0.012); interaction effect of visual and auditory stimuli on variable “my favorite sports brand” was also significant (F = 6.283, p = 0.016); 2) In the influence on consumer demand, interaction effect of visual and auditory stimuli on “I hope to have more shoes” was significant (F = 4.672, p = 0.034). Thus, we concluded that visual-auditory subliminal persuasion has an impact on brand attitude and consumer demand.
文章引用：唐金玉, 汤永隆, 陈思瑶 (2015). 视听阈下说服对消费行为的影响. 心理学进展, 5(4), 262-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2015.54036

参考文献

[1] 陈月明(2001). 形象广告与功效广告. 宁波大学学报(人文科学版), 2期, 41-44.
[2] 陈真真, 蔡頠, 郑涌(2012). 阈下说服的存在证据与争议. 心理科学进展, 4期, 575-583.
[3] 杨海波, 白学军, 李怡繁(2009). 认知负荷对网页广告加工过程的影响. 应用心理学, 3期, 230-235.
[4] Byrne, D. (1959). The effect of a subliminal food stimulus on verbal response. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 249-252.
[5] Chakalis, E., & Lowe, G. (1992). Positive effects of subliminal stimulation on memory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74, 956-958.
[6] Cooper, J., & Cooper, G. (2002). Subli-minal motivation: A story revisited. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 2213-2227.
[7] Epley, N., Savitsky, K., & Kachelski, R. A. (1999). What every skeptic should know about subliminal persuasion. Skeptical Inquirer, 23, 40-58.
[8] Elder, R., & Krishna, A. (2010). The effects of advertising copy on sensory thoughts and perceived taste. The Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 748-756.
[9] Gass, R. H., & Seiter, J. S. (2003). Persuasion, social influence, and compliance gaining (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Longman, 34.
[10] Greenwald, A. G., & Liu, T. J. (1985). Limited unconscious processing of meaning. Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston.
[11] Greenwald, A. G., Spangenberg, E. R., Pratkanis, A. R., & Eskenazi, J. (1991). Double-blind tests of subliminal self-help audio tapes. Psychological Science, 2, 119-122.
[12] Hawkins, D. (1970). The effects of subliminal stimulation on drive level and brand preference. Journal of Marketing Research, 7, 322-326.
[13] Huitema, B. E. (2011). The analysis of covariance and alternatives: Statistical methods for experiments, quasi-experiments, and single-case studies (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
[14] Krishna, A. (2012). An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgment and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 332-351.
[15] Moore, T. E. (1995). Subliminal self-help auditory tapes: An empirical test of perceptual consequences. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 27, 9-20.
[16] Riener, A. (2012). Subliminal persuasion and its potential for driver behavior adaptation. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 13, 71-80.
[17] Stein, B. E., Stanford, T. R., & Rowland, B. A. (2009). The neural basis of multisensory integration in the midbrain: Its organization and maturation. Hearing Research, 258, 4-15.
[18] Spence, C., & Gallace, A. (2011). Multisensory design: Reaching out to touch the consumer. Psychology and Marketing, 28, 267-308.
[19] Spence, D. P. (1964). Effects of a continuously flashing subliminal verbal food stimulus on subjective hunger ratings. Psychological Reports, 15, 993-994.
[20] Spence, D. P., & Ehrenberg, B. (1964). Effects of oral deprivation on responses to subliminal and supraliminal verbal food stimuli. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 10-18.