职业学校校长竞值变革领导角色指标之建构:以阶层程序分析法为例
An Analysis of Indicator Weight of Change Leadership Role for Vocational High School Principals from the Perspectives of Analytic Hierarchy Process
摘要: 本研究以竞值架构为基础,探讨台湾职业学校校长在组织变革中应有的领导角色,并透过阶层程序分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process,简称AHP)建构校长竞值变革领导角色指标。本研究选定调查之专家含技职教育行政人员4人、教育行政学者6人、技职体系学者5人、职业学校教育人员7人、职业学校之家长与业界4人,合计26人,先进行三次德怀术问卷调查,再依据研究统计分析结果编制相对权重调查问卷,藉由次序量尺(ordinal scale)来做成评鉴层面与指针的成对两两做比较,求取各阶层间的权重。统计分析结果:四种职业学校竞值变革领导角色层面依权重体系之排序分别为「A创造」权重为37%、「B合作」权重为35%、「C控制」权重为16%与「D竞争」权重为13%。十二种角色层面相对较高权重者为:B-1社群建立者15.40%、A-3革新者12.60%、A-2企业家11.88%、B-2同理者11.55%、A-1梦想家11.52%。
Abstract: The purpose of the study was to analyze the principals’ leadership roles in the organizational change for vocational high schools in Taiwan. From the perspectives of competing values frame-work, the indicators of change leadership role for vocational high school principals were con-structed with a questionnaire of Delphi. Total 26 expert members including 4 vocational high school administrative staffs, 6 scholars in educational administration, 5 scholars in vocational education, 7 vocational high school teaching staffs, and 4 persons (parental representative or enterprise director) were selected to execute the Delphi questionnaire for 3 times. Then, one relative weight questionnaire was drafted and forwarded to the expert members of Delphi. Analytic hierarchy Process (AHP) was adapted to construct its weight system in the study. The research findings indicated as the following: 1) In the first hierarchy, the essential factors for principals’ competing values leadership role in organizational change for vocational high school included A) creation, B) cooperation, C) control, and D) competition, with the highest weights of 37%, 35%, 16%, and 13% respectively. 2) In the second hierarchy, twelve various competing values leadership roles classified to A), B), C), or D) and its relative weights were shown as below. A) Creation: A-1 “Dreamer”, A-2 “Enterpriser”, and A-3 “Reformer”, with the weights of 11.52%, 11.88%, and 12.60%. B) Cooperation: B-1 “Community Builder”, and B-2 “Empathetic Supporter”, with the weights of 15.40%, and 11.55%.
文章引用:郑彩凤. 职业学校校长竞值变革领导角色指标之建构:以阶层程序分析法为例[J]. 教育进展, 2015, 5(6): 182-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AE.2015.56030

参考文献

[1] Gill, I.S., Fluitman, F. and Dar, A. (2000) Vocational Education and Training Reform: Matching Skills to Markets and Budgets. Oxford University Press, New York.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/0-1952-1590-7
[2] Hausman, C.S., Crow, G.M. and Sperry, D.J. (2000) Portrait of the Ideal Principal: Context and Self. NASSP Bulletin, 84, 617.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019263650008461701
[3] Denison, D.R., Hooijberg, R. and Quinn, R.E. (1995) Paradox and Performance: Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial Leadership. Organizational Science, 6, 524-540.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.5.524
[4] Murnighan, J.K. and Conlon, D. (1991) The Dynamics of Intense Workgroups: A Study of British String Quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 165-186.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393352
[5] O’Neill, R.M. and Quinn, R.E. (1993) Editors’ Note: Applications of the Competing Values Framework. Human Resource Management, 32, 1-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930320101
[6] Cameron, K.S. and Quinn, R.E. (1999) Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture. Addison-Wesley, Reading.
[7] Quinn, R.E. (1988) Beyond Rational Management: Mastering Paradoxes and Competing Demands of High Effectiveness. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
[8] Cameron, K.S., Quinn, R.E., Degraff, J. and Thakor, A.V. (2006) Competing Values Leadership: Creating Value in Organizations. Edward Elgar Pub, Massachusetts.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781847201560
[9] Quinn, R.E. and McGrath, M.R. (1985) The Transformation of Organizational Cultures: A Competing Values Perspective. In: Frost, P.J., Moore, L.F., Louis, M.L., Lundberg, C.C. and Martin, J., Eds., Organizational Culture, Sage, Beverly Hills, 315-334.
[10] Lemahieu, P.G. and Roy, P.A. (1997) Through a Lens Clearly. Urban Education, 31, 582-608.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0042085997031005008
[11] Mumford, M.D., Marks, M.A., Zaccaro, S.J., Connelly, M.S. and Reiter-Palmon, R. (2000) Development of Leadership Skills: Experience, Timing, and Growth. The Leadership Quarterly, 11, 87-114.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00044-2
[12] Yukl, G. (2010) Leadership in Organizations. 7th Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
[13] Waldman, D.A., Ramirez, G.G., House, R.J. and Puranam, P. (2001) Does Leadership Matter? CEO Leadership Attributes and Profitability under Conditions of Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 134-143.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3069341
[14] Berson, Y, Oreg, S. and Dvir, T. (2008) CEO Values, Organizational Culture and Firm Outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 615-633.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.499
[15] Goldring, E.B. and Rallis, S.F. (1993) Principals of Dynamic Schools. Corwin Press, Newbury Park.
[16] Deal, T.E. and Peterson, K.D. (1994) The Leadership Paradox: Balancing Logic and Artistry in Schools. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
[17] Sergiovanni, T.J. (1995) The Principalship: A Reflective Practice Perspective. 3rd Edition, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
[18] Lipman-Blumen, J. (1996) The Connective Edge: Learning in an Interdiciplinary World. Jossey-Bass.
[19] Jakson, D.S. (2000). The School Improvement Journey: Perspective on Leadship. School Leadership and Management, 20, 61-78.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13632430068888
[20] Sergiovanni, T.J. (2001) Leadership: What’s in It for Schools? Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
[21] 郑彩凤. 职业学校校长组织变革领导角色指针之建构与衡量、及其与领导效能关系之研究: 竞值架构之观点[Z]. 行政院国家科学委员会NSC 97-2410-H-017-004-MY2, 2010.
[22] Saaty, T.L. (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York, McGraw-Hill.