兰州市北山不同人工林土壤持水能力和渗透性特征研究
Research on Soil Moisture Retention Capacity and Soil Infiltration Property of Different Kinds of Artificial Forests in Northern Mountain of Lanzhou
摘要: 为了解兰州市北山不同林地土壤持水能力和渗透特性,选取白榆和刺槐混交林地、新疆杨林地、梨树林地和侧柏林地4种林地类型,研究不同林地土壤持水能力和渗透性。结果表明,土壤容重为新疆杨树林地(1.46 g/cm3) > 梨树林地(1.40 g/cm3) > 混交林地(1.28 g/cm3) > 侧柏林地(1.27 g/cm3);总孔隙度在不同林地间存在显著差异(P < 0.05);在0~20 cm土层深度内各林地土壤毛管孔隙均最大,在20~40 cm土层深度内各林地土壤非毛管孔隙均最大;土壤最大持水量侧柏林地最大(1040.87 t/hm2),梨树林地最小(913.29 t/hm2);土壤入渗速率在0~40 cm土层深度内随时间增加而逐渐减小,在40 cm以下基本不变。经研究分析得出,人工林对土壤持水能力和入渗特性的影响主要集中在0~40 cm土层深度内。
Abstract: This paper mainly studied soil moisture retention capacity and soil infiltration property of four different artificial forests, which are Ulmus pumila and Robinia psrudoacid, Populus alba L. Var. pyramidalis, Pyrus SPP and Platycladus orientalis which was planted in northern mountain of Lanzhou. The results go as follows: The soil bulk density in the four different artificial forests from high to low is Populus alba L. Var. pyramidalis (1.46 g/m3) > Pyrus SPP (1.40 g/cm3) > Mixed forest (1.28 g/cm3) > Platycladus orientalis (1.27 g/cm3); Total soil porosity varies dramatically with different kinds of forest land. Capillary prosity is maximum in different kinds of forest land between 0 to 20 centimeters, while non capillary prosity is maximum in different kinds of forest land between 0 to 20 centimeters. Max soil moisture capacity changes greatly in different kinds of forest land, Platycladus orientalis is max and Pyrus SPP is min. The soil infiltration characteristics is increased as time goes by between 0 to 40 centimeters, while under 40 centimeters almost steadiness. According to soil moisture capacity and soil infiltration characteristics, plants’ influence on soil character of physics is focused on between 0 to 40 centimeters.
文章引用:康有财, 赵锦梅, 张秋艳, 孔军军, 何桂萍, 李小东. 兰州市北山不同人工林土壤持水能力和渗透性特征研究[J]. 土壤科学, 2016, 4(1): 11-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/HJSS.2016.41002

参考文献

[1] 邱莉萍, 张兴昌. 子午岭不同土地利用方式对土壤性质的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2006, 21(6) : 966-972.
[2] 马群, 赵庚星. 集约农区不同土地利用方式对土壤养分状况的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(11): 1834-1844.
[3] Clau-dio, Z., Annalisa, C. and Franco, P. (2010) Soil Degradation by Land Use Change in an Agropastoral Area in Sardinia (Italy). CATENA, 83, 46-54.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2010.07.003
[4] 刘春利, 邵明安. 黄土高原六道沟流域不同土地利用方式下土壤水力特性及其对土壤水分的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(11): 2400-2407.
[5] 黄庆丰, 高健, 吴泽明. 不同森林类型土壤肥力状况及水源涵养功能的研究[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2002, 29(1): 82-86.
[6] 钟芳, 赵瑾, 孙荣高, 李正平, 王万鹏. 兰州南北两山五类乔灌木林草地土壤养分与土壤微生物空间分布研究[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 19(3): 94-101.
[7] 孙万儒. 森林土壤分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1999.
[8] 马雪华, 王淑远. 森林生态系统研究方法[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 1994: 213-253.
[9] 孙艳红, 张洪江, 程金花, 等. 缙云山不同林地类型土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J]. 水土保持学报, 2006, 20(2): 106-109.
[10] 孟好军, 刘贤德, 张宏斌, 等. 祁连山人工林掉落物和土壤水分特性的研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2013, 33(2): 12-15.
[11] 刘贤赵, 康绍忠. 黄土高原沟壑区小流域土壤入渗分布规律的研究[J]. 吉林林学院学报, 1997, 13(4): 203-208.
[12] 刘道平, 陈三雄, 张金池, 谢莉, 姜姜. 浙江安吉主要林地类型土壤渗透性[J]. 应用生态学报2007, 18(3): 493-498.
[13] 马琳, 李学斌, 谢应忠. 草地生态系统枯落物分解及功能研究[J]. 草业与牧业, 2011(12): 7-12.
[14] 单梦颖, 杨永刚, 吴兆录. 云南省中部3种森林土壤含水率、容重和细根重及其垂直分布[J]. 云南地理环境研究, 2013, 25(4): 38-42.