“威马逊”引发广西暴雨的等熵位涡与湿位涡变化特征
Isentropic Potential Vorticity and Moist Potential Vorticity’s Variation Characteristics of Heavy Rain Caused by Rammasun in Guangxi
DOI: 10.12677/AG.2016.63021, PDF, HTML, XML,  被引量 下载: 2,109  浏览: 5,300  科研立项经费支持
作者: 钟利华, 李勇:广西壮族自治区气象服务中心,广西 南宁;王琳, 肖天贵, 房玉洁:成都信息工程学院大气科学学院,四川 成都;覃武:广西壮族自治区气象局,广西 南宁
关键词: “威马逊”台风广西暴雨等熵位涡湿位涡The Rammansun Typhoon Guangxi Stormy Isentropic Potential Vorticity Moist Potential Vorticity
摘要: 本文运用NCEP/NCAR 1˚ × 1˚再分析资料,结合广西区域自动气象站降水资料,对超强台风“威马逊”(1409)引发广西暴雨天气的等熵位涡与湿位涡变化特征进行了分析,结果表明:此次台风暴雨是由东南气流带来的高温高湿水汽在台风外围强辐合上升作用下产生的对流性强降雨,水汽主要来自孟加拉湾、南海以及西太平洋。由等熵位涡分析可知,台风中心位涡值最大,高层位涡值大于低层位涡值。“威马逊”为强台风时,未来6 h暴雨中心位于位涡中心气流辐合处,其强度减弱为热带风暴后,未来6 h暴雨中心则位于位涡中心右侧。由湿位涡分析可知,“威马逊”暴雨中心多位于MPV1 < 0区域内,对流层低层MPV1“上正下负”配置有利于暴雨的发生发展,台风中心与MPV1大值中心对应。对流层低层MPV2“上负下正”配置有利于降水的增幅,MPV1 < 0且MPV2 > 0的区域对未来6 h暴雨中心有较好的指示性,MPV1 < 0且MPV2 < 0叠加对于未来6 h降水有增幅效果,同样易出现暴雨中心。
Abstract: This paper aims at analyzing the variation characteristics of IPV and MPV of rainstorm in Guangxi, which is triggered by the super typhoon Rammasun (1409), by analyzing the precipitation data from automatic station in Guangxi area and reanalyzing the data of NCEP/NCAR (National Centers for Environment Prediction/National Center for Atmosphere Research). Isentropic potential vor-ticity (IPV) and moist potential vorticity (MPV) characteristics of the rainstorm in Guangxi are analyzed, which is triggered by super typhoon Rammasun (1409). The conclusions are as follows: The strong convection rainstorm weather is affected by warm and moist air convergence which contributes to the development of ascent movement. Water vapor is mainly transported from the Bay of Bengal, the South China Sea and the Western Pacific. The calculation of IPV shows that IPV from the upper layer is larger than the lower layer, and IPV of the typhoon center is the maximum. When Rammasun is strong typhoon, the rainstorm center locates at the center of the potential vorticity and airflow convergence in the next 6 hours; while Rammasun’s intensity decreases as tropical storm, the rainstorm center lies in the right side of the center of IPV in the next 6 hours. According to the results of the analysis of MPV, rainstorm center is likely to occur in negative MPV1 region. It is advantageous to the development of rainstorm that MPV1 is “positive at upper and negative at low” in the low troposphere. The center of typhoon has a very good correspondence with the center of big value of MPV1. MPV2, “negative at upper and positive at low”, is benefited for the increasing of precipitation in the low troposphere. When MPV1 < 0 and MPV2 > 0, the future rainstorm center will probably happen. Negative MPV1 and negative MPV2 are good for increasing of precipitation in the next 6 hours and also heavy rain center will happen.
文章引用:钟利华, 王琳, 肖天贵, 覃武, 房玉洁, 李勇. “威马逊”引发广西暴雨的等熵位涡与湿位涡变化特征[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2016, 6(3): 180-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AG.2016.63021

参考文献

[1] 郑艳, 蔡亲波, 程守长, 等. 超强台风“威马逊”(1409)强度和降水特征及其近海急剧加强原因[J]. 暴雨灾害, 2014, 33(4): 333-341.
[2] 陈见, 孙红梅, 高安宁, 等. 超强台风“威马逊”与“达维”进入北部湾强度变化对比分析[J]. 暴雨灾害, 2014, 33(4): 392-400.
[3] 范学峰. “海棠”台风远距离强降水分析[J]. 气象与环境科学, 2007, 30(4): 30-33.
[4] 刘峰, 丁治英, 梁艳, 等. “莫拉克”台风暴雨过程中湿位涡场的演变特征[J]. 暴雨灾害, 2011, 30(2): 161-166.
[5] 黄亿, 寿绍文, 傅灵艳. 对一次台风暴雨的位涡与湿位涡诊断分析[J]. 气象, 2009, 35(1): 65-73.
[6] 范学峰, 席世平. 湿位涡诊断分析在河南台风远距离降水中的应用[J]. 气象与环境科学, 2012, 35(2): 25-32.
[7] 王宏, 寿绍文, 王万筠, 等. 一次局地暴雨过程的湿位涡诊断分析[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2009, 18(3): 129-134.
[8] 戴廷仁, 寿绍文, 陈艳秋, 等. 辽宁地区一次暴雨过程成因的位涡诊断分析[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2006, 15(3): 31- 36.
[9] 全美兰, 葛权哲, 吕志红, 等. “7.21”北京特大暴雨的湿位涡诊断分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(8): 232-238.
[10] 屠妮妮, 李跃清. 一次引发川东暴雨的西南涡特征分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2014, 32(6): 962-971.
[11] 王伏村, 许东蓓, 王宝鉴, 等. 敦煌致洪暴雨的广义湿位涡分析[J]. 高原气象, 2013, 32(1): 145-155.
[12] 叶爱芬, 李江南, 徐永辉, 等. 珠三角一次暖区强降水过程湿位涡的演变特征[J]. 热带气象学报, 2011, 27(2): 237- 243.
[13] 岳彩军. Q矢量、螺旋度、位涡及位涡反演在台风暴雨研究中的应用进展[J]. 暴雨灾害, 2014, 33(3): 193-201.
[14] 田秀霞, 何丽华, 陈笑娟. 一次西南涡暴雨的等熵位涡特征分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2014, 30(6): 25-30.
[15] 吴蓁, 范学峰, 郑世林, 等. 台风外围偏东气流中的暴雨及其等熵位涡特征[J]. 高原气象, 2008, 27(3): 584-595.
[16] 丁一汇, 马晓青. 2004/2005年冬季强寒潮事件的等熵位涡分析[J]. 气象学报, 2007, 65(5): 695-707.
[17] Hoskins, B.J., McIntyre, M.E. and Robertson, A.W. (1985) On the Use and Significance of Isentropic Potential Vorticity Maps. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 111, 877-946.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711147002
[18] 杨贵名, 毛冬艳, 姚秀萍. “强降水和黄海气旋”中的干侵入分析[J]. 高原气象, 2006, 25(1): 16-28.
[19] 吴国雄, 蔡雅萍, 唐晓菁. 湿位涡和倾斜涡度发展[J]. 气象学报, 1995, 53(4): 387-405.
[20] 李生艳, 丁治英. “碧丽斯”台风暴雨影响广西的湿位涡诊断分析[J]. 气象研究与应用, 2007, 28(1): 25-28.