AP  >> Vol. 6 No. 8 (August 2016)

    A Qualitative Research on College Students’ Media Multitasking Behaviors

  • 全文下载: PDF(401KB) HTML   XML   PP.914-922   DOI: 10.12677/AP.2016.68117  
  • 下载量: 1,069  浏览量: 1,460   科研立项经费支持


范宜平,龚少英,王义玮,王 祯:华中师范大学心理学院,湖北 武汉

学习情境大学生媒体多任务行为Learning Environment College Students Media Multitasking Behaviors


为了解学习情境下我国大学生媒体多任务行为现状、影响及其原因,本研究对32名大学生进行了半结构式访谈,结果发现:1) 学习情境下,84%的大学生会进行媒体多任务行为,特别是与学习无关的媒体多任务行为。2) 学习者报告媒体多任务行为会降低学习效率和质量,引发内疚和焦虑情绪;但也有学习者提出媒体多任务行为使人感到放松和愉悦,激励学习、重组思路。3) 影响大学生媒体多任务行为的因素包括个体特质、情绪状态、社交需要等个体因素和任务特征、媒体环境特点等外部因素。说明学习情境下大学生媒体多任务现象非常普遍,这种行为既有积极影响又有消极影响,而其影响因素也是多方面的。

To explore the features of media multitasking behaviors among Chinese college students and reveal its impacts and antecedents, thirty-two college students were interviewed by using semi- structured questionnaire. The results showed: 1) there were 84% college students engaging in media multitasking behaviors while learning, especially in non learning related media multitasking behaviors. 2) On the one hand, it impaired the efficiency and quality of learning, and induced learners’ guilt and anxiety; on the other hand, some learners felt relaxed and happy and their thoughts and learning became better. 3) Media multitasking behaviors were influenced by indi-vidual factors such as learner’s personality, mood state and social needs, and external factors, for example, task characteristics and environmental factors. These findings suggested that media multitasking behaviors were very popular among college students. Moreover, these behaviors had double edged impacts and were influenced by multiple factors.

范宜平, 龚少英, 王义玮, 王祯 (2016). 学习情境下大学生媒体多任务行为的质性研究. 心理学进展, 6(8), 914-922. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/AP.2016.68117


[1] 刘晨, 孔繁昌, 周宗奎(2014). 从一心一意到三心二意: 青少年的媒体多任务行为. 心理科学, 37(5), 1132-1139.
[2] Adler, R. F., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2013). Self-Interruptions in Discretionary Multitasking. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1441-1449.
[3] Alzahabi, R., & Becker, M. W. (2013). The Association between Media Multitasking, Task-Switching, and Dual-Task Performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1485.
[4] Bowman, L. L., Levine, L. E., Waite, B. M., & Gendron, M. (2010). Can Students Really Multitask? An Experimental Study of Instant Messaging While Reading. Computers & Education, 54, 927-931.
[5] Burak, L. (2012). Multitasking in the University Classroom. In-ternational Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6, 1-12.
[6] Calderwood, C., Ackerman, P. L., & Conklin, E. M. (2014). What Else Do College Students “Do” While Studying? An Investigation of Multitasking. Computers & Education, 75, 19-29.
[7] Charmaz, K. (2009). 建构扎根理论: 质性研究实践指南. 边国明, 译. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社.
[8] Jacobsen, W. C., & Forste, R. (2011). The Wired Generation: Academic and Social Outcomes of Electronic Media Use among University Students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 275-280.
[9] Jeong, S.-H., & Fishbein, M. (2007). Predictors of Multitasking with Media: Media Factors and Audience Factors. Media Psychology, 10, 364-384.
[10] Jez, V. (2011). Searching for the Meaning of Multitasking. NOKOBIT, 2011, 157-166.
[11] Judd, T. (2013). Making Sense of Multitasking: Key Behaviors. Computers & Education, 63, 358-367.
[12] Junco, R., & Cotten, S. R. (2012). No A 4 U: The Relationship between Multitasking and Academic Performance. Computers & Education, 59, 505-514.
[13] Kononova, A., & Alhabash, S. (2012). When One Medium Is Not Enough: Media Use and Media Multitasking among College Students in Kuwait. Journal of Middle East Media, 8, 1-28.
[14] Lee, J. (2012). A Mixed-Methods Study Investigating the Relationship between Media Multitasking Orientation and Grade Point Average. Doctoral Dissertation, Denton, TX: University of North Texas.
[15] Lui, K. F., & Wong, A. C. N. (2012). Does Media Multitasking Always Hurt? A Positive Correlation between Multitasking and Multisensory Integration. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 647-653.
[16] Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive Control in Media Multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 15583-15587.
[17] Rideout, V., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year-Olds. Kaiser Family Foundation Report, Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Founda-tion.
[18] Roberts, D. F., Foehr, U. G., & Rideout, V. J. (2005). Generation M: Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year-Olds. Washington DC: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
[19] Rosen, L. D., Mark Carrier, L., & Cheever, N. A. (2013). Face-book and Texting Made Me Do It: Media-Induced Task- Switching while Studying. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 948-958.
[20] Sana, F., Weston, T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2013). Laptop Multi-tasking Hinders Classroom Learning for Both Users and Nearby Peers. Computers & Education, 62, 24-31.
[21] Sparks, G. (2015). Media Effects Research: A Basic Overview. Nelson Education.
[22] Vega, V. (2009). Media-Multitasking: Implications for Learning and Cognitive Development in Youth. Background Paper Prepared for the NSF-Sponsored Seminar on Implications of Media-Multitasking for Learning and Cognitive Development in Youth. Palo Alto: Stanford University.
[23] Wallis, C. (2010). The Impact of Media Multitasking on Children’s Learning and Development. Report form a Research Seminar, New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.
[24] Wang, Z., & Tchernev, J. M. (2012). The “Myth” of Media Multitasking: Reciprocal Dynamics of Media Multitasking, Personal Needs, and Gratifications. Journal of Communication, 62, 493-513.