社会水文学研究方法和难点
Methodologies and Challenges for Socio-Hydrology
DOI: 10.12677/JWRR.2016.56061, PDF, HTML, XML,  被引量 下载: 2,265  浏览: 3,259  国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 刘 攀, 冯茂源, 郭生练, 李泽君：武汉大学水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室，水资源安全保障湖北省协同创新中心，湖北 武汉
关键词: 社会水文学；耦合系统；协同演化；动力系统；Socio-Hydrology； Coupled System； Coevolution； Dynamical System
摘要: 人类文明离不开水。在气候变化和人类活动等变化环境下，人类社会系统与水文系统之间的联系愈加紧密。本文基于国内外研究现状，辨析社会水文学的基本定义、与水资源管理和生态水文学的区别，综述社会水文学的主要研究方法，展望社会水文学研究的热点和难点问题，最后简述目前学术界对社会水文学的争议。社会水文学重点研究社会–水文耦合系统的协同演化和动力学机制，以期能够增加人们对于社会水文系统内在联系规律的了解，提高人类对于未来水文水资源的预测能力。
Abstract: Human civilization depends greatly on water. Human society is increasingly connected with the hydrologic system as human activities intensify and global climate changes. Based on recent research at home and abroad, this paper introduces the definition of socio-hydrology that different with water resources management and eco-hydrology, summarizes the socio-hydrology modeling approaches, identifies the challenges of socio-hydrology issues, and finally briefs the controversies in the academic field. The socio- hydrology focuses on the dynamics and coevolution of coupled human and hydrological systems for the purpose of improving the understanding of coupled human and water systems and the capability of pre-dicting the future of water resources system.
文章引用：刘攀, 冯茂源, 郭生练, 李泽君. 社会水文学研究方法和难点[J]. 水资源研究, 2016, 5(6): 521-529. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/JWRR.2016.56061

参考文献

[1] MONTANARI, A., YOUNG, G., SAVENIJIE, H. H. G., et al. “Panta Rhei—Everything Flows”: Change in hydrology and society—The IAHS Scientific Decade 2013-2022. Hydrological Science Journal, 2013, 58(6): 1256-1275. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.809088
[2] MONTANARI, A. Debates—Perspectives on socio-hydrology: Introduc-tion. Water Resources Research, 2015, 51(6): 4770- 4781. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017430
[3] SIVAPALAN, M., SAVENIJIE, H. H. G. and BLÖSCHL, G. Socio-hydrology: A new science of people and water. Hydrological Processes, 2012, 26(8): 1270-1276. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8426
[4] SIVAPALAN, M., KONAR, M., SRINIVASAN, V., et al. So-cio-hydrology: Use-inspired water sustainability science for the Anthropocene. Earth’s Future, 2014, 2(4): 225-230. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EF000164
[5] KANDASAMY, J., SOUNTHARARAJAH, D., SIVAPALAN, P., et al. So-cio-hydrologic drivers of the pendulum swing between agricultural development and environmental health: A case study from Murrumbidgee River basin, Australia. Hydrology and Earth System Science, 2014, 18(3): 1027-1041. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1027-2014
[6] VAN EMMERIK, T. H. M., LI, Z., SIVAPALAN, M., et al. Socio-hydrologic modeling to understand and mediate the competition for water between agriculture development and environmental health: Murrumbidgee River basin, Australia. Hydrology and Earth System Science, 2014, 18(10): 4239-4259. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4239-2014
[7] ELSHAFEI, Y., SIVAPALAN, M., TONTS, M., et al. A prototype framework for models of socio-hydrology: Identification of key feedback loops and parameterisation approach. Hydrology and Earth System Science, 2014, 18(6): 2141-2166. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2141-2014
[8] ELSHAFEI, Y., COLETTI, J. Z., SIVAPALAN, M., et al. A model of the so-cio-hydrologic dynamics in a semiarid catchment isolating feedbacks in the coupled human-hydrology system. Water Resources Research, 2015, 51(8): 6442-6471. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017048
[9] SIVAPALAN, M., BLÖSCHL, G. Time scale interactions and the coevolution of humans and water. Water Resources Research, 2015, 51(9): 6988-7022. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017896
[10] BALDASSARRE, G. D., VIGLIONE, A., CARR, G., et al. Debates-Perspectives on socio-hydrology: Capturing feedbacks between physical and social processes. Water Resources Research, 2015(51): 4770-4781. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016416
[11] GOBER, P., WHEATER, H. S. Debates—Perspectives on socio-hydrology: Modelling flood risk as a public policy problem. Water Resources Research, 2015, 51(6): 4782-4788. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR016945
[12] LOUCKS, D. P. Debates—Perspectives on social-hydrology: Simulating hydro-logic-human interactions. Water Resources Research, 2015, 51(6): 4789-4794. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017002
[13] SIVAPALAN, M. Debates—Perspectives on socio-hydrology: Changing water system and tyranny of small problems. Water Resources Research, 2015, 51(6): 4795-4805. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017080
[14] TROY, T. J., PAVAO-ZUCKERMAN, M. and EVAN, T. P. De-bates—Perspectives on socio-hydrology: Socio-hydrologic modeling: Tradeoffs, hypothesis testing, and validation. Water Re-sources Research, 2015, 51(6): 4806-4814. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017046
[15] CHEN, X., WANG, D., TIAN, F. and SIVAPALAN, M. Fromchannalization to restoration: Sociohydrological modeling with changing community preferences in the Kissimmee River Basin, Florida. Water Resources Research, 2016, 52(2): 1227-1244. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018194
[16] LIU, J., DIETZ, T., CARPENTER, S. R., et al. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 2007, 317(5844): 1513-1516. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144004
[17] LIU, J., DIETZ, T., CARPENTER, S. R., et al. Coupled human and natural systems. Ambio, 2007, 36(8): 639-649. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[639:CHANS]2.0.CO;2
[18] SANDERSON, W. C. Simulation models of demo-graphic, economic, and environmental interactions. In: Lutz, W., Ed., Population—Development—Environment, Berlin: Springer, 1994: 33-71.
[19] HOFBAUER, J., SIGMUND, K. The theory of evolution and dynamical systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
[20] ROBINSON, C. Dynamical systems: Stability, symbolic dynamics, and chaos. Boca Rotan: CRC Press, 1995.
[21] AN, L., ZVOLEFF, A., LIU, J. and AXINN, W. Agent-based modeling in coulped human and natural systems: Lessons from a comparative analysis. Annuals of the Association of American Geographers, 2014, 104(4): 723-745. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.910085
[22] EVANS, T. P., KELLEY, H. Multi-scale analysis of a household level agent-based model of landcover change. Journal of Environment Management 2004, 72(1-2): 57-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.02.008
[23] NIAZI, M., HUSSAIN, A. Agent-based computing from multi-agent sys-tems to agent-based models: A visual survey. Scientometrics, 2011, 89(2): 479-799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0468-9
[24] DAWSON, R. J., PEPPE, R. and WANG, M. An agent-based model for risk-based flood incident management. Natural Hazards, 2011, 59(1): 167-189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9745-4
[25] HOUSH, M., CAI, X., NG, T. L., et al. System of systems model for analysis of biofuel development. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2015, 21(3): 04014050. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000238
[26] YAEGER, M. A., HOUSH, M., CAI, X. and Sivapalan, M. An integrated modeling framework for exploring flow regime and water quality changes with increasing biofuel crop production in the US Corn Belt. Water Resources Research, 2014, 50(12): 9385-9404. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015700
[27] WESTRA, S., THYER, M., LEONARD, M., KAVETSKI, D. and LAMBERT, M. A strategy for diagnosing and interpreting hydrological model nonstationary. Water Resources Research, 2014, 50(6): 5090-5113. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014719
[28] SIVAKUMAR, B. Socio-hydrology: Not a new science, but a recycled and re-worded hydrosociology. Hydrological Processes, 2012, 26(24): 3788-3790. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9511
[29] FALKENMARK, M. Water and mankind: A complex system of multual interaction. Ambio, 1977, 6(1): 3-9.
[30] FALKENMARK, M. Main problems of water use and transfer of technology. GeoJournal, 1979, 3(5): 435-443. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00455982
[31] 秦大庸, 陆垂裕, 刘家宏, 等. 流域“自然–社会”二元水循环理论框架[J]. 科学通报, 2014, 59(4-5): 419-427. QIN Dayong, LU Chuiyu, LIU Jiahong, et al. Theoretical framework of dualistic nature-social water cycle. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2014, 59(4-5): 419-427. (In Chinese)
[32] 王浩, 严登华, 贾仰文, 等. 现代水文水资源学科体系及研究前沿和热点问题[J]. 水科学进展, 2010, 21(4): 479-489. WANG Hao, YAN Denghua, JIA Yangwen, et al. Subject system of modern hydrology and water resources and research fron-tiers and hot issues. Advances in Water Science, 2010, 21(4): 479-489. (In Chinese)
[33] 吴季松. 创建资源系统工程管理新学科——兼谈“首都水资源规划”新型工程管理[J]. 中国工程科学, 2004, 6(8): 5-11. WU Jisong. Create new subject of systematic engineering management of resources—New type of management of engineeringin “Beijing Water Resources Plan”. Engineering Science, 2004, 6(8): 5-11. (In Chinese)
[34] 李雪松, 伍新木. 水资源可持续利用的制度分析与制度创新[J]. 经济评论, 2007, 28(1): 72-77. LI Xuesong, WU Xinmu. Institute analysis and innovation for sustainable utilization of water resources. Economic Review, 2007, 28(1): 72-77. (In Chinese)
[35] 郭生练, 许崇育, 陈华, 刘德地. 流域水文水资源与社会耦合系统研究进展与评价[J]. 水资源研究, 2016, 5(1): 1-15. GUO Shenglian, XU Chongyu, CHEN Hua and LIU Dedi. Review and assessment of interaction between watershed hydrology and society system. Journal of Water Resources Research, 2016, 5(1): 1-15. (In Chinese) https://doi.org/10.12677/JWRR.2016.51001