关于堤坝坝顶高程计算中安全加高的讨论
Discussion on Safety Freeboard in Calculating Crest Elevation of Levee
DOI: 10.12677/OJSWC.2016.44014, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 2,065  浏览: 5,766 
作者: 张彦洪, 王馨梅, 高彦婷:甘肃农业大学水利水电工程系,甘肃 兰州
关键词: 堤坝工程安全加高安全超高防洪安全洪水漫溢Dam Safety Freeboard Safety Height Flood Control Safety Flood Overflow
摘要: 安全加高是确定堤坝坝顶高程的重要参数,直接影响防洪安全和经济性。本文基于现行规范和防洪工程资料,分析讨论了堤坝工程设置安全加高的必要性、取值原则和方法。研究表明,影响洪水漫顶的安全因素,基本上都可以定量确定,计算静水位以上的超高时没有必要再单独考虑安全加高。安全加高的规定与当前防洪工程发展形势不适应,与欧美发达国家通行做法不一致。建议构建柔性综合防洪体系,取消安全加高的规定,安全超高由浪高和风壅增高直接确定。
Abstract: Safety freeboard, one of the important parameters to determine the crest elevation of levee, de-termines the safety and economy of flood control engineering in a great way. Based on the current design codes and some research materials, the necessary and selections of the safety freeboard corresponding to different structures and different typical flood are studied. The results show that the main factors of flood overtopping can be quantitatively determined, so there is no need to es-timate safety freeboard in calculating dam height above static water level. Now, stipulation of safety freeboard is in some contradiction with flood control development and not consistent with the prevailing practice in western developed countries. It is necessary to revise applicable design codes and standards. When constructing a flexible comprehensive flood control system and canceling safety freeboard in calculating crest elevation, safety height is just equal to sum of heights by waves and the wind.
文章引用:张彦洪, 王馨梅, 高彦婷. 关于堤坝坝顶高程计算中安全加高的讨论[J]. 水土保持, 2016, 4(4): 99-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/OJSWC.2016.44014

参考文献

[1] 水利水电工程等级划分及洪水标准(SL252-2000) [S]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2000.
[2] 城市防洪工程设计规范(GBT50805-2012) [S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2012.
[3] 堤防工程设计规范(GB 50286-2013) [S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2013.
[4] 碾压式土石坝设计规范(SL274-2001) [S]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2002.
[5] 混凝土重力坝设计规范SL319-2005 [S]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2005.
[6] 水闸设计规范(SL265-2001) [S]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2001.
[7] 海堤工程设计规范(SL435-2008) [S]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2008.
[8] 朱晓玲, 陈皓, 李玉芬. 浙江省小流域防洪堤设计堤顶超高研究[J]. 人民长江, 2012, 43(18): 79-80.
[9] 姚慰城. 讨论防汛墙的安全超高问题[J]. 上海水务, 2000, 1(1): 6-7.
[10] 溢流道设计规范(SL253-2000) [S]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2000.
[11] 黄波, 马广州, 王俊峰. 荷兰洪水风险管理的弹性策略[J]. 水利快报, 2013, 33(5): 6-10.
[12] Vis, M., Klijn, F., De Bruijn, K.M. and Van Buuren, M. (2003) Resili-ence Strategies for Flood Risk Management in the Netherlands. International Journal of River Basin Management, 1, 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2003.9635190
[13] Correljé, A. and Broekhans, B. (2015) Flood Risk Management in the Nether-lands after the 1953 Flood: A Competition between the Public Value(s) of Water. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 8, 99-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12087
[14] Nillesen, A.L. and Kok, M. (2015) An Integrated Approach to Flood Risk Management and Spatial Quality for a Netherlands’ River Polder Area. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 20, 949-966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9675-7
[15] Ran, J. and Nedovic-Budic, Z. (2016) Integrating Spatial Planning and Flood Risk Management: A New Conceptual Framework for the Spatially Integrated Policy Infrastructure. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 57, 68-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.01.008