大面积航班延误的事后分析研究
A Study on Postmortem Resonsibility Analysis for Large-Scale Flight Delay
DOI: 10.12677/OJTT.2017.61004, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 1,584  浏览: 3,216 
作者: 左 燕:中国民用航空华东地区空中交通管理局安全管理部,上海;曹悦琪, 张兆宁:中国民航大学空中交通管理学院,天津
关键词: 航班延误事后分析航班运行过程指标体系责任主体Flight Delay Postmortem Analysis Process of Flight Running Indicator System Responsible Unit
摘要: 为有效降低某一空域未来航班延误发生的可能性,在该空域的一次大面积航班延误结束以后,找出航班运行过程中的航班延误相关影响因素,确定航班延误的主要责任主体尤为重要。通过分析航班运行过程选取了航班延误事后分析指标,建立了航班延误事后分析模型,依据航班计划表和航班实际运行数据确定延误航班的首次延误指标和后续延误指标,根据各个指标的延误责任先后和延误时间加权综合确定航班延误的主要责任主体。以2013年7月18日华北地区某空域的大面积航班延误为例,选取A航班数据采用建立的航班延误事后分析指标体系对延误航班的各项指标取值进行了追溯与计算,确定主要延误责任主体为天气延误,与当日的大规模雷雨天气现象相符。
Abstract: In order to adopt appropriate measures to avoid the occurrence of more flight delays, it’s helpful to identify the weak links in the process of flights running and determine the main responsible units for flight delays by analyzing postmortem responsibility of large-scale flight delays. Postmortem analysis indicator is selected by analyzing the process of flights running and a two-layer postmortem analysis indicator system is built by classifying these indicators into different responsibility units. A model of postmortem analysis for flight delays is established to identify the first delay indicator and the subsequent delay indicator according to flight schedules and flight actual operating data and to determine the main responsible unit of flight delays by calculating the responsibility order and time of delay of each indicator with weights, for example, in July 18, 2013 in North China airspace of a large area of flight delays with the A flight data. By using established flight delays post-hoc analysis index system delayed flights, the indicators values are calculated retrospectively. At last, it’s confirmed that the major delay responsible unit is weather delay that is realistic with the day of large-scale thunderstorm weather phenomenon.
文章引用:左燕, 曹悦琪, 张兆宁. 大面积航班延误的事后分析研究[J]. 交通技术, 2017, 6(1): 23-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/OJTT.2017.61004

参考文献

[1] Jarrah, A.I.Z., Yu, G., Krishnamurthy, N., et al. (1993) A Decision Support Framework for Airline Flight Cancellations and Delays. Transportation Science, 27, 266-280.
https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.27.3.266
[2] Evans, J.E. and Ducot, E.R. (1994) The Integrated Terminal Weather System (ITWS). The Lincoln Laboratory Journal, 7, 449-474.
[3] Bhat, V.N. (1995) A Multivariate Analysis of Airline Flight Delays. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 12, 54-59.
https://doi.org/10.1108/02656719510080613
[4] Allan, S.S., Gaddy, S.G. and Evans, J.E. (2001) Delay Causality and Reduction at the New York City Airports Using Terminal Weather Information Systems. Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts.
[5] 鲁悦. 航空公司航班计划质量评价方法与实证研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2010.
[6] 张静, 徐肖豪, 王飞. 天气影响的机场容量概率分布[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2011, 43(1): 41-48.
[7] 董念清. 中国航班延误的现状, 原因及治理路径[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报: 社会科学版, 2013, 26(6): 25-32.
[8] 袁冬霖. 航班延误的原因分析及对策探讨[J]. 中国民用航空, 2011(2): 40-41.
[9] 张哲. 关于航班延误的起因与对策[J]. 空运商务, 2006(28): 31-33.
[10] 赵嶷飞, 张亮. 航班延误统计指标体系及延误等级评估研究[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2009, 7(2): 9-15.
[11] 高自亮, 张世平. 民航航班正常性数据的统计[J]. 中国民用航空, 2008(4): 48-50.
[12] 中国民用航空局. 民航航班正常统计办法(征求意见稿)[EB/OL]. http://www.atmb.net.cn/web/UploadFile/20141222154408653001.pdf
[13] 胡运权, 郭耀煌. 运筹学教程[M]. 第3版. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2007: 273-301.
[14] 秦吉, 张翼鹏. 现代统计信息分析技术在安全工程方面的应用——层次分析法原理[J]. 工业安全与防尘, 1999(5): 44-48.
[15] 常建娥, 蒋太立. 层次分析法确定权重的研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版), 2007(1): 153-156.