多元信息耦合的致灾山洪降雨预报方法
Forecasting of Flash-Flood-Producing Precipitation by Coupling Multiple Sources of Information
DOI: 10.12677/JWRR.2017.62013, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 1,629  浏览: 2,780  国家科技经费支持
作者: 熊 明, 杨文发, 訾 丽：长江水利委员会水文局，湖北 武汉；李 俊：中国气象局武汉暴雨研究所，湖北 武汉；周北平：南京信息工程大学，江苏 南京
关键词: 致灾山洪；雷达；数值天气预报；耦合；Disastrous Flash Flooding； Radar； Numerical Weather Forecasting； Coupling
摘要: 雷达预估信息(0~2 h)、数值天气预报产品(0~72 h)及基于高空和地面大气探测资料的综合预报信息(0~24 h)在不同预见期的降雨预报各有差异，预报效果上各有优劣，而针对山洪的预报存在准确率低、预警有效时间短等问题，研究面向山洪灾害防治区的数值预报模式的选取、模式最优物理参数化组合方案、同化方案、降水偏差订正技术以及基于大数据的自分型雷达估测降水最优化算法。以湖南临湘市为试验区进行验证，结果表明：WRF中尺度数值模式适用于山洪灾害降雨预报，其WSM6云微物理过程、Grell-Devenyi ensemble对流参数化方案和YSU边界层参数方案对致洪山洪暴雨过程模拟较好，基于频率(或面积)匹配的降水偏差订正方法能显著改善模式降水预报中雨量和雨区范围的系统性偏差，大数据分析方法应用于雷达估测降雨能显著提高准确度。在此研究基础上，提出了基于高空和地面大气探测、数值预报模式的0~72 h短期定量降雨预报和基于雷达的0~2 h临近定量降雨预报的多元信息耦合预报方法，将对致灾山洪的预报时间由2 h延长至72 h，并可显著提高了山洪预报的精度。
Abstract: The precipitation forecasts from radar and satellite cloud pictures (with a lead time of 0 - 2 h), from upper air and ground surface atmospheric sounding (with a lead time of 0 - 24 h) and from numerical forecasting mode (with a lead time of 0 - 72 h) have different forecast effect in different forecast pe-riods. Considering the short lead time and low accuracy forecast for early warning of mountain tor-rents, study on the numerical forecasting model, the model’s optimized combination of parameters, data assimilation, correcting the errors on forecasted rainfall in flash-flood affected region and an op-timized calculating method based on big data for radar monitoring precipitation. Linxiang City of Hu-nan Province was selected as experimental area and the results show that the WRF numerical forecast is more suitable for the forecast of disasters including mountain torrents. Among them, WSM6 cloud microphysical process, Grell-Devenyi ensemble convective parameterization scheme and YSU boun-dary layer parameter configuration scheme can greatly simulate the process of mountain torrents and storm causing a flood, precipitation deviation correction method based on frequency (or area) match can considerably improve the systematic deviation in the rainfall and scope of rain area in the preci-pitation forecast, the big data analysis method used in radar rainfall forecast can remarkably improve the accuracy. A forecasting disastrous flash floods method has been proposed by coupling upper air and ground surface atmospheric sounding, the 0 - 72 h short-term quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPF) from numerical forecasting mode and the 0 - 2 h nowcast QPF based on radar, which helps to increase the lead time of flash flooding forecasts from 2 h to 72 h and enhance significantly the fore-casting accuracy.
文章引用：熊明, 杨文发, 李俊, 周北平, 訾丽. 多元信息耦合的致灾山洪降雨预报方法[J]. 水资源研究, 2017, 6(2): 91-102. https://doi.org/10.12677/JWRR.2017.62013

参考文献

[1] 李红霞, 覃光华, 等. 山洪预报预警技术研究进展[J]. 水文, 2014, 34(5): 12-16. LI Hongxia, QIN Guanghua, et al. Advances in study on flash flood forecast and warning. Journal of China Hydrology, 2014, 34(5): 12-16. (in Chinese)
[2] 杨扬, 张建云, 等. 雷达测雨及其在水文中应用的回顾与展望[J]. 水科学进展, 2000, 11(1): 92-98. YANG Yang, ZHANG Jianyun, et al. Review and prospect on the application of weather radar in hydrology. Advances in Water Science, 2000, 11(1): 92-98. (in Chinese)
[3] LIN, C. A., VASIC, S. and TURNER, B. Precipitation forecast based on numerical weather prediction models and radar nowcasts. Sixth International Symposium on Hydrological Applications of Weather Radar, Melbourne, ERAD, 2004.
[4] 张利平, 赵志朋, 等. 雷达测雨及其在水文水资源中的应用研究进展[J]. 暴雨灾害, 2008, 27(4): 373-377. ZHANG Liping, ZHAO Zhipeng, et al. An overview of precipitation measured by radar and its application on hydrology and water resources. Torrential Rain and Disasters, 2008, 27(4): 373-377. (in Chinese)
[5] 魏林宏, 郝振纯, 等. 雷达测雨在水文学中的应用——影响预报精度的因素分析[J]. 水利水电技术, 2004, 35(5): 1-4. WEI Linhong, HAO Zhenchun, et al. Application of radar rainfall measurement to hydrology. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2004, 35(5): 1-4. (in Chinese)
[6] 彭新东, 李兴良. 多尺度大气数值预报的技术进展[J]. 应用气象学报, 2010, 21(2): 129-138. PENG Xindong, LI Xinglicang. Advances in the numerical method and technology of multi-scale numerical prediction. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 2010, 21(2): 129-138. (in Chinese)
[7] 胡淳焓, 黄娟, 等. 基于强度尺度法的雷达和数值模式定量降水预报检验对比[J]. 热带气象学报, 2015, 31(2): 273-279. HU Chunhan, HUAN Juan, et al. Verification of quantitative precipitation forecast between radar and numerical model based on intensity-scale method. Journal of Tropical Meteorology, 2015, 31(2): 273-279. (in Chinese)
[8] 陆桂华, 吴娟, 等. 水文集合预报试验及其研究进展[J]. 水科学进展, 2012, 23(5): 728-734. LU Guihua, WU Juan, et al. Advances in hydrologic ensemble prediction experiment. Advances in Water Science, 2012, 23(5): 728-734. (in Chinese)
[9] ATENCIA, A., RIGO, T., SAIROUNI, A., et al. Improving QPF by blending techniques at the meteorological service of Gatalonia. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci, 2010(7).
[10] 胡胜, 罗聪, 等. 基于雷达外推和中尺度数值模式的定量降水预报的对比分析[J]. 气象, 2012, 38(3): 274-280. HU Sheng, LUO Cong, et al. Comparisons of one hour precipitation forecast between the radar extrapolation and the mesoscale numerical model. Meteorological Monthly, 2012, 38(3): 274-280. (in Chinese)
[11] AUSTIN, G. L., BELLON, A., et al. On the interaction between radar and satellite image nowcasting systems and meso-scale numerical models. Symposium on Mesoscale Analysis and Forecasting, Vancouver, ESA SP, 1987: 282.
[12] GOLDING, B. W. A system for generating automated very short range forecasts. Meteorol A Zppl, 1989(5).
[13] 张培昌, 杜秉玉, 戴铁丕. 雷达气象学[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2001: 181-184. ZHANG Peichang, DU Bingyu and DAI Tiepi. Radar meteorology. Beijing: China Meteorological Press, 2001: 181-184. (in Chinese)