现代人路怒现状及其归因方式的研究
Research of Persons’ Present Situation of Road Rage and the Way of Their Attribution
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2017.74065, PDF, HTML,  被引量 下载: 1,484  浏览: 1,919 
作者: 李 钰:湖南师范大学,湖南 长沙
关键词: 路怒路怒现状归因方式Road Rage The Current Situation of Road Rage Ways of Attribution
摘要: 该研究先采用访谈法对不同职业、年龄、学历、婚姻状况等30人进行具体的了解,在此基础上制成“路怒归因方式问卷”,以探求路怒现状及归因方式对路怒的影响,被试最终有522名。结果表明:(1) 路怒在性别和年龄上没有显著差异,但在职业、学历和婚姻状况等上有显著差异;(2) 路怒与内归因存在正相关(r = 0.058);与外归因呈负相关(r = −0.088);与相同归因也存在相关关系,(r = −0.054);(3) 职业、收入和学历与归因方式间存在显著差异,而性别与年龄与归因方式间的差异不显著。研究结论:归因方式的确会导致路怒的差异,它体现在路怒的产生和程度上,内归因对路怒的影响大于外归因。
Abstract: At first, this author asked 30 persons, whose career, age, educational background and marital status are all different, and then the author has designed a scale called “the ways of attribution of road rage scale”, which has been filled in by 522 persons at last. The results are as follows: (1) peoples’ road-rage in gender and age has no significant difference, but it has significant difference in careers, earnings in a month, education and situation of marriage; (2) modern people's road rage and internal attributional pattern are positively correlated (r = 0.058); show a very negative correlation among modern people’s road rage and external attributional pattern (r = −0.088); show a negative correlation of road rage and equal attributional pattern (r = −0.054); (3) occupation, income and education, compared with gender and age, have significant difference with the attributional pattern of road rage. And the conclusion is: different attributional patterns do affect road rage; it reflects in the produce and degree of road rage; and internal attribution can produce more effect than external attribution.
文章引用:李钰 (2017). 现代人路怒现状及其归因方式的研究. 心理学进展, 7(4), 531-536. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2017.74065

参考文献

[1] 李凤芝, 李昌吉, 龙云芳, 等(2004). 汽车驾驶员攻击性驾驶行为的心理因素分析. 四川大学学报(医学版), 35(4), 568- 570.
[2] 骞宪忠, 郑建中(2011). 生物心理社会医学模式视角下的“路怒症”剖析. 中国社会医学杂志, 28(4), 269-270.
[3] 吴宁, 蒋京川(2011). 如此驾驶为哪般, 从归因及人格角度看路怒. 社会心理科学, (Z2), 92-95.
[4] 张晓伟(2013). 浅谈积极归因方式的培养——基于积极心理学视角. 吉林省教育学院学报, 29(7), 89-90.
[5] 章洁, 吕鹏飞(2014). 路怒现象的心理学解读. 青年科学, 35(7).
[6] 赵晨鹰, 黄希庭(2003). 汽车驾驶员攻击性驾驶行为的研究. 应用心理学, 9(3), 52-55.
[7] 朱国锋, 何存道(2003). 驾驶员情绪状态研究. 心理科学, 26(3), 438-440.
[8] Matthews, G. (2002). Towards a Transactional Ergonomics for Driver Stress and Fatigue. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 3, 195-211.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220210124120
[9] Lajunen, T., & Parker, D. (2001). Are Aggressive People Aggressive Drivers? A Study of the Relationship between Self-Reported General Aggressiveness, Driver Anger and Aggressive Driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 33, 243- 255.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(00)00039-7