法学  >> Vol. 5 No. 2 (April 2017)

律师会见权的保障与规范
The Protection and Specification of Lawyers’ Interview Right

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2017.52005, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 1,069  浏览: 3,069 

作者: 周莳文, 邓钰玮:华南理工大学法学院,广东 广州

关键词: 律师会见权保障规范Lawyers’ Interview Right Protection Specification

摘要: 会见权是辩护权的衍生权利,其产生与发展见证着刑事法律文明的进程。保障律师会见权是维护犯罪嫌疑人、被告人合法权益的关键,但片面的强调会见权优先不符合案件侦破的客观规律。律师会见权制度的设置,应当围绕保障与规范两个中心来进行。实践当中“会见难”的难题一直在困扰着广大职业律师,另一方面,对于律师会见行为的合法性缺乏有效的监管,律师会见仍然存在一些是否“正当”的困惑。为此,有必要厘清律师会见权的保障与规范的法律意义,立足律师会见的现状与问题,完善律师会见权的保障机制,合理地规范律师会见权。
Abstract: The right of interview is the derivative right of the right of defense, and its emergence and development have witnessed the progress of criminal legal civilization. It is the key to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the criminal suspect and the defendant, but the one-sided emphasis on the right of priority does not accord with the objective law. The establishment of the system of lawyer’s interview right should be carried out around the two centers of security and standardization. In practice, it is difficult to meet the lawyer, and on the other hand, there is the lack of effective supervision of the legality of the lawyer’s interview behavior, and there is still a “legitimate” confusion. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the legal meaning of the right to interview and regulate the lawyer’s right to interview, and according to the problems arising from the meeting of lawyers, to improve the security mechanism of the right to right to interview lawyers.

文章引用: 周莳文, 邓钰玮. 律师会见权的保障与规范[J]. 法学, 2017, 5(2): 28-34. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJLS.2017.52005

参考文献

[1] General Comments of the Human Rights Committee of the International Convention of Civil and Political Rights. General Comment, 13, 9.
[2] 左卫民, 周长军. 刑事诉讼的理念[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 1997.
[3] 卡斯东•斯特法尼, 等. 法国刑事讼诉法精义(上)[M]. 罗结珍, 译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 1999.
[4] De Muniz, P.J. (2004) Judicial Reform in Russia: Russia Looks to the Past to Create a New Adversarial System of Criminal Justice. 11 Willamette Journal of International Law and Dispute Resolution, 81, 81-122.
[5] 何家弘. 司法公正论[J]. 中国法学, 1999(2): 14.
[6] Hodgson, J. (2005) French Criminal Justice a Comparative Account of the Investigation and Prosecution of Crime in France. Hart Publishing, Oxford, Portland, Oregon, 131-135.
[7] 麦高伟. 英国刑事司法程序[M]. 姚永吉, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2003.
[8] 伟恩•R•拉费弗. 刑事诉讼法[M]. 卞建林等, 译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2003.
[9] 理查德•杜•坎恩. 律师的辩护艺术[M]. 陈泉生, 译. 北京: 群众出版社, 1989.
[10] 陈学权. 辩护律师对法庭的真实义务[J]. 中国司法, 2005(9): 61.
[11] 斐迪南•滕尼斯. 共同体与社会[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1999.
[12] 张文显, 卢学英. 法律职业共同体引论[J]. 法制与社会发展, 2002(6): 31.