惠民凹陷商河油田商三区沙二下低渗透储层特征
The Low-Permeability Reservoir Properties of Lower Submember of Member 2 of Shahejie Formation in the Third Area of Shanghe Oilfield in Huimin Depression
DOI: 10.12677/JOGT.2017.392010, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 1,322  浏览: 2,291 
作者: 杨志军:中国石化胜利油田分公司临盘采油厂,山东 临邑
关键词: 沙河街组二段下亚段低渗透储层储层特征储层评价EsL2 Low Permeability Reservoir Reservoir Characteristics Reservoir Evaluation
摘要: 惠民凹陷商河油田商三区断块较多,沙河街组二段下亚段(EsL2)砂体形态复杂,属于低渗透储层,基础地质研究薄弱。以小层为研究单元,在开展沉积相精细研究的基础上,充分利用岩心、测井、录井、化验分析等资料,对EsL2储层的岩石学、孔隙结构、物性、非均质性、敏感性和裂缝等特征进行了详细研究及储层综合评价。研究表明,商三区EsL2属于中孔、低渗-特低渗储层;储层岩石类型以岩屑质石英粗粉-细砂岩为主,成分成熟度中等,结构成熟度较低;储集空间以粒间孔、粒间溶孔为主,孔喉半径较小;具有弱敏感性;层内和平面上具有较强的非均质性,层间非均质性较弱。以沉积微相分布和孔、渗数据为评价依据,对商三区EsL2储层进行分类和评价:I类储层物性最好,以河口砂坝为主;II类储层物性较好,主要以远砂坝为主,河口砂坝次之;III类储层物性最差,以发育支流间湾为主。其中I类和II类储层为主力层,主要分布在1 + 2砂组和3砂组。
Abstract: Because there existed many blocks in the 3rd Area of Shanghe Oilfield, the shape of sand body was complex inEsL2. It belonged to a low permeability reservoir, where basic geologic study was less. By taking the sublayer as study unit, on the basis of the detailed study of sedimentary facies, fully applying the data of cores, well logging, geologic logs and chemical analysis, the reservoir characteristics of petrology, pore structures, physical property, heterogeneity, sensitivity and fractures in EsL2 were researched in detail, and then the reservoir was evaluated comprehensively. The study showed that the rock types were dominated by lithic quartz coarse siltstone-fine sandstone; its compositional maturity was medium and the textural maturity was low; the major types of pore were intergranular pore and intergranular dissolved pore; and the pore throat radius was small; the reservoir sensitivity was weak; inner layer and areal heterogeneity was stronger; and interlayer heterogeneity was weak. Based on the distribution of sedimentary microfacies and the data of the porosity and permeability, three types of reservoirs in the area were classified and evaluated. Physical property of Type I is the best, in which mouth bar is generally developed. Physical property of Type II is better than that of Type I, which is dominated by the distal bar and mouth bar is the next. Physical property of Type III is the poorest, which is dominated by the interbranch channel. The Type I and Type II are the major reservoirs among them, and they are mainly distributed in the sand group 1 + 2 and 3.
文章引用:杨志军. 惠民凹陷商河油田商三区沙二下低渗透储层特征[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2017, 39(2): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.12677/JOGT.2017.392010

参考文献

[1] 杨希濮, 孙卫, 高辉, 等. 三塘湖油田牛圈湖区块低渗透储层评价[J]. 断块油气田, 2009, 12(2): 5-8.
[2] 李道品. 低渗透油田开发概论[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 1997, 16(3): 33-37.
[3] Law, A., Megson, J. and Pye, M. (2001) Low Permeability Reservorirs: Introduction. Petroleum Geoscience, 7, 2-3.
https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo.7.1.2
[4] 曾大乾, 李淑贞. 中国低渗透砂岩储层类型及地质特征[J]. 石油学报, 1994, 15(1): 38-46.
[5] 杨晓萍, 赵文智, 邹才能, 等. 低渗透储层成因机理及优质储层形成与分布[J]. 石油学报, 2007, 28(4): 57-61.
[6] 杨百全, 黄华梁, 李玉华, 等. 低渗透储层特征参数研究与应用[J]. 天然气工业, 2001, 21(2): 32-35.
[7] 杨正明, 张英芝, 郝明强, 等. 低渗透油田储层综合评价方法[J]. 石油学报, 2006, 27(2): 64-67.
[8] Dou, Q. and Huang, S. (2002) Evaluating Low-Permeability Reservoirs of Hongliuquan Lithological Trap. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 29, 87-89.
[9] Li, Y. (2004) Modeling of Low Permeability Sandstone Reservoirs. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 31, 99-105.
[10] 熊伟, 刘华勋, 高树生. 低渗透储层特征研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 5(31): 89-92+200-201.
[11] Haldorsen, H.H. and Damsleth, E. (1993) Challenges in Reservior Characterization. AAPG Bulletin, 77, 541-551.
[12] 邱隆伟, 姜在兴, 操应长. 惠民凹陷临盘油田沙二下亚段储层成岩演化[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 1997, 21(4): 6-8.
[13] 华晓琴. 商三区沙二下亚段地层精细划分与沉积特征研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2011.
[14] 王青春, 何幼斌. 商河油田商三区沙二下亚段储层沉积微相研究[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2005, 27(6): 851-853.
[15] 曲占庆, 何利敏, 战永平, 等. 商三区注入水储层伤害判断及解堵实验[J]. 断块油气田, 2014, 21(2): 232-235.
[16] 蒋凌志, 顾家裕, 郭彬程. 中国含油气盆地碎屑岩低渗透储层的特征及形成机理[J]. 沉积学报, 2004, 22(1): 13-18.
[17] 马文国, 王影, 海明月, 等. 压汞法研究岩心孔隙结构特征[J]. 实验技术与管理, 2013, 30(1): 66-69.
[18] 吴朝东, 刘建民, 王军, 等. 河流沉积单元分析与储层宏观非均质性[J]. 地质科学, 2003, 38(1): 60-73.
[19] 陈永红. 商三区沙二下储层敏感性研究[J]. 江汉石油学院学报, 2004, 26(1): 74-76.
[20] 刘洪涛, 曾联波, 房宝才, 等. 裂缝对大庆台肇地区低渗透砂岩储层注水的影响[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 29(4): 68-72.
[21] 赵加凡, 陈小宏, 张勤. 灰关联分析在储层评价中的应用[J]. 勘探地球物理进展, 2003, 26(4): 282-286.