所有权性质、资本结构与企业涉足房地产绩效
Ownership Nature, Capital Structure and the Performance of the Enterprises Involved in Real Estate
摘要: 本文选取了2001-2014年间的244家多元化经营涉足房地产领域的非房地产企业作为研究样本,实证检验了所有权性质和资本结构对这些企业涉房绩效的影响。结果发现:国有企业的涉房绩效低于民营企业,国有企业在房地产行业的优势在企业涉房的短期中并没有表现出来;银行借款水平和企业涉房绩效呈负相关关系,商业信用与企业涉房绩效呈正相关关系。由于房地产项目融资主要依赖银行借款,非房地产公司在进入房地产行业时,高银行借款水平不利于企业对房地产项目的经营,存在“挤出效应”,对企业的绩效产生负方向的影响,而商业信用主要对企业产生“治理效应”和“信号传递效应”,对企业涉房绩效产生正向影响。
Abstract: This article selected 244 non-real-estate enterprises which involved into real estate during 2001 to 2014 as the research sample, and tested the relationship between the ownership nature, capital structure and the performance of the enterprises involved in real estate. The conclusion is that: the performance of the state-owned enterprises involved in real estate is lower than private enterprises, bank loan has a negative correlation with the performance of the enterprises involved in real estate, business credit has a positive correlation with the performance of the enterprises involved in real estate. A high bank loan level has crowding-out effect on the performance of the enterprises involved in real estate, business credit effects the performance of the enterprises involved in real estate by the effect of governance and signaling effect.
文章引用:杨川. 所有权性质、资本结构与企业涉足房地产绩效[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2017, 6(5): 560-565. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2017.65077

参考文献

[1] Tullock, G. (1967) The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies, and Theft. Economic Inquiry, 5, 224-232.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1967.tb01923.x
[2] 巫景飞, 苏健. 控股股东所有制性质对房地产企业土地获取策略的影响探讨[J]. 商业经济研究, 2012, 31(17): 75-76.
[3] 敖小波. 政治关联, 融资便利与公司绩效——来自房地产行业的经验证据[J]. 会计之友, 2014, 32(7): 454-454.
[4] 贺晋, 张晓峰, 丁洪. 资本结构对企业绩效影响的实证研究——以我国房地产行业为例[J]. 企业经济, 2012, 33(6): 39-42.
[5] Jensen, B.M. and Meckling, P. (1976) The Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 3, 305-360.
[6] Ross, S.A. (1977) The Determination of Financial Structure: The Incentive-Signalling Approach. Bell Journal of Economics, 8, 23-40.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3003485