环境规划中环境承载力分析不宜被生态承载力测算替代
Environmental Carrying Capacity Should Not Be Replaced by Ecological Carrying Capacity in Environmental Planning
DOI: 10.12677/AEP.2017.73036, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 1,777  浏览: 3,863 
作者: 周敬宣*, 周业晶:华中科技大学环境科学与工程学院,湖北 武汉
关键词: 环境承载力环境容量生态承载力多目标模型Environmental Carrying Capacity Environmental Capacity Ecological Carrying Capacity Multi-Objective Model
摘要: 当前环境规划中有用生态承载力测算代替环境承载力研究的现象。生态承载力分析要点是资源,环境承载力的研究要点是环境容量与人类活动的阈值。环境规划的目标是既要保持经济持续发展,又要提升环境质量,将各种排污总量控制在环境容量之内。任务就是要测算与提升环境承载力,可以根据区域监测、统计数据,建立系统动力学的多目标优化模型,进行科学分析;对可能的发展模式进行讨论,预测各种模式下经济、能源、环境的发展趋势并测算多项阈值。生态足迹法是用生产性土地的面积来评估生态承载力,难直接评价人类活动阈值。因此环境规划中不宜用生态承载力替代环境承载力进行测算。
Abstract: At present, there is a phenomenon that the analysis of environmental carrying capacity has been replaced by the analysis of ecological carrying capacity in some environmental planning. Ecological carrying capacity focuses on resources, and the keys of environmental carrying capacity include environmental capacity and human activity thresholds. The purpose of environmental planning is to coordinate the economic development and environmental protection, improve the environmental carrying capacity, and control the total emission within the environmental capacity. An important mission of planning is predicting the economic, energy and environmental trends under several scenarios, calculating environmental carrying capacity thresholds by establishing a multi-objective System Dynamics model based on regional monitored and statistic data for a more scientific analysis. Ecological footprint method is to use the area of productive land to assess the ecological carrying capacity, but it is difficult to evaluate the human activity thresholds directly. Therefore, in the compiling of environmental planning, the environmental carrying capacity should not be replaced by ecological carrying capacity analysis.
文章引用:周敬宣, 周业晶. 环境规划中环境承载力分析不宜被生态承载力测算替代[J]. 环境保护前沿, 2017, 7(3): 252-257. https://doi.org/10.12677/AEP.2017.73036

参考文献

[1] Zhou, Y.J. and Zhou, J.X. (2017) Urban Atmospheric Environmental Capacity and Atmospheric Environmental Carrying Capacity Constrained by GDP and PM2.5. Ecological Indicators, 73, 637-652.
[2] 周业晶, 周敬宣, 肖人彬, 张国斐. 以GDP-PM2.5达标为约束的东莞大气环境容量及承载力研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2016, 36(6): 2231-2241.
[3] 周业晶, 周敬宣, 肖人彬. 区域PM2.5内源外源贡献率的集对分析研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2015, 38(12): 135-140.
[4] 周业晶, 周敬宣, 肖人彬. 系统动力学预测区域减排措施对GDP和PM2.5的影响[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2016, 39(4): 161-167.
[5] Zhou, Y.J., Zhou, J.X. and Xiao, R.B. (2016) A Research for Regional Contribution Rate of Internal Source and External Source of PM2.5 Based on Set Pair Analysis Method. Meteorological and Environmental Research, 7, 36-40.
[6] 周敬宣, 周业晶. 区域资源资产核算技术与环境容量及承载力阈值的研究[J]. 环境保护前沿. 2016, 6(2): 29-37.
[7] 周敬宣, 周业晶. 生态环境规划编制中多目标规划模型与环境容量的研究[J]. 环境与可持续发展, 2017, 42(2): 41-45.
[8] 周敬宣, 周业晶, 夏梦. 城镇环境类规划现状与问题改进研究[J]. 环境保护前沿, 2017, 7(2): 139-146.
[9] Zhu, H., Qian, J. and Feng, L. (2011) Negotiating Place and Identity after Change of Administrative Division. Social & Cultural Geography, 12, 143-158.