积极情绪背景对词语记忆的影响
Effects of Emotionally Positive Context on Memory for Words
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2017.76104, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 3,756  浏览: 8,187  国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 刘敏飞, 张 钦:首都师范大学心理系,北京;王 浩:白城师范学院传媒学院,吉林 白城
关键词: 积极情绪趋近动机背景再认Positive Affect Approach-Motivation Context Recognition
摘要: 本研究采用学习-测验范式,以大学生为被试,通过两个实验考察了不同趋近强度的积极情绪背景材料对词语记忆的影响。研究表明,当使用情绪图片作为学习词语时的背景材料时,高趋近积极情绪背景(美食图片背景)可能比低趋近积极情绪背景(鲜花图片背景)更不利于学习者的编码加工,从而影响其再认表现。当使用真正的鲜花或食物作为学习和记忆测试过程中的背景材料时,低趋近的鲜花背景更可能干扰被试的再认反应。
Abstract: Selecting undergraduates as participants, the present study examined the effects of low versus high approach-motivated positive affect on memory of words by employing the study-test para-digm. The results showed that, when emotional pictures were as context during learning, high approach-motivated positive affect pictures (delicious food pictures) were more likely to interfere with the encoding process of words and thus impaired recognition performance as compared to low approach-motivated positive affect pictures (flower pictures); when real flowers or delicious foods were as context during learning and test, low approach-motivated flower background was more likely to interfere with participants’ recognition as compared to high approach-motivated food background and neutral background.
文章引用:刘敏飞, 王浩, 张钦 (2017). 积极情绪背景对词语记忆的影响. 心理学进展, 7(6), 833-843. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2017.76104

参考文献

[1] 李文丽(2015). 积极图片背景的趋近动机强度对词语记忆的影响. 硕士论文, 北京: 首都师范大学.
[2] 罗跃嘉, 王一牛(2004). 汉语情绪词系统(CAWS). 北京: 中国科学院心理学研究所.
[3] Erk, S., Martin, S., & Walter, H. (2005). Emotional Context during Encoding of Neutral Items Modulates Brain Activation Not Only during Encoding But Also during Recognition. Neuro Image, 26, 829-838.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.045
[4] Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive Emotions Broaden the Scope of Attention and Thought-Action Repertoires. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 313-332.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930441000238
[5] Gable, P. A., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2008). Ap-proach-Motivated Positive Affect Reduces Breadth of Attention. Psychological Science, 19, 476-482.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02112.x
[6] Gable, P. A., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2010a). The Motivational Dimensional Model of Affect: Implications for Breadth of Attention, Memory, and Cognitive Categorization. Emotion and Cognition, 24, 322-337.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903378305
[7] Gable, P. A., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2010b). The Effect of Low versus High Approach-Motivated Positive Affect on Memory for Peripherally versus Centrally Presented Information. Emotion, 10, 599-603.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018426
[8] Jaeger, A., Johnson, J. D., Corona, M., & Rugg, M. D. (2009). ERP Correlates of the Incidental Retrieval of Emotional Information: Effects of Study-Test Delay. Brain Research, 1269, 105-113.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.02.082
[9] Kim, J. S.-C., Vossel, G., & Gamer, M. (2013). Effects of Emotional Context on Memory for Details: The Role of Attention. PLoS ONE, 8, e77405.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077405
[10] Smith, A. P. R., Henson, R. N. A., Dolan, R. J., & Rugg, M. D. (2004). fMRI Correlates of the Episodic Retrieval of Emotional Contexts. Neuro Image, 22, 868-878.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.01.049
[11] Zhang, Q., Liu, X., An, W., Yang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2015). Recognition Memory of Neutral Words Can Be Impaired by Task-Irrelevant Emotional Encoding Contexts: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 73.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00073