智能电网  >> Vol. 7 No. 4 (August 2017)

基于加权秩和比的智能变电站继电保护状态评估
Relay Protection State Evaluation Based on Weighted Rank Sum Ratio in Smart Substation

DOI: 10.12677/SG.2017.74027, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 853  浏览: 2,198 

作者: 吴小忠*:国网湖南省电力公司,湖南 长沙;朱维钧:国网湖南省电力公司电力科学研究院,湖南 长沙;时 谊, 席亚克, 汪广远:许继集团有限公司,河南 许昌

关键词: 智能变电站继电保护状态评估变异系数法加权秩和比层次分析法综合权重Smart Substation Relay Protection State Evaluation Variation Coefficient Method Weighted Rank Sum Ratio Analytic Hierarchy Process Comprehensive Weigh

摘要: 针对智能变电站继电保护运行信息日益增多的趋势,为了对其状态做出准确的评估,提出一种基于综合权重与秩和比法的状态评估方法。首先分析继电保护状态评估流程和建立评估指标体系,利用乘法组合法将层次分析法确定的主观权重和变异系数法确定的客观权重相结合,得到最终的综合权重。其次通过引入秩和比法与综合权重相结合,构成加权秩和比,对继电保护装置状态进行综合评估分档。最后以某220 kV变电站各典型间隔的继电保护为例,通过对评估结果进行最佳分档一致性检验,验证了所提方法的合理性和可行性。
Abstract: In view of the tendency of increasing operation information about smart substation relay protection, in order to obtain accurate evaluation of relay protection state, an evaluation method based on comprehensive weight and rank sum ratio is raised. Firstly, to analyze the relay protection status assessment process and establish the evaluation index system, and then use the multiplicative method to combine the subjective weight determined by the analytic hierarchy process and the objective weight determined by the coefficient of variation to obtain the final comprehensive weight. Secondly, relay protection state is comprehensively evaluated and graded by combining rank sum ratio method and comprehensive weight to make up weighted rank sum ratio. Finally, taking different interval relay protections of some 220 kV substations for instance, the rationality and the feasibility of proposed method were verified through the consistency assessment of the results of the optimal grading test.

文章引用: 吴小忠, 朱维钧, 时谊, 席亚克, 汪广远. 基于加权秩和比的智能变电站继电保护状态评估[J]. 智能电网, 2017, 7(4): 244-251. https://doi.org/10.12677/SG.2017.74027

参考文献

[1] 陈少华, 马碧燕, 等. 综合定量计算继电保护系统可靠性[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2007, 31(15): 111-115.
[2] Dai, Z.H. and Wang, Z.P. (2011) Protection Dynamic Reliability Analysis System Based on 3RF Technique. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 3, 1137-1144.
[3] 郑涛, 王方, 金乃正. 基双重化继电保护系统确定最佳检修周期新方法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2010, 34(10): 67-70.
[4] Abbarin, A. and Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M. (2009) A Novel Routine Test Schedule for Protective Systems Using an Extended Component-Based Reliability Model. International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Shanghai, 18-19August 2009, 97-102.
[5] 廖瑞金, 王谦, 等. 基于模糊综合评判的电力变压器运行状态评估模型[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2008, 32(3): 70-74.
[6] 吕文超, 吕飞鹏, 等. 模糊聚类法在继电保护状态检修中的应用[J]. 电力系统及其自动化学报, 2013, 25(2): 93- 97.
[7] 刘永欣, 师峰, 等. 智能变电站继电保护状态监测的一种模糊评估算法[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2014, 42(3): 37-40.
[8] Billinton, R., Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M. and Sidhu, T.S. (2002) Determination of the Optimum Routine Test and Self- Checking Intervals in Protective Relaying Using a Reliability Model. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 17, 663-669.
[9] Damchi, Y. and Sadeh, J. (2009) Considering Failure Probability for Back-Up Relay in Determination of the Optimum Routine Test Interval in Protective System Using Markov Model. IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting, Calgary, 26-30 July 2009, 1-5.
[10] 张文朝, 顾雪平. 应用变异系数法和逼近理想解排序法的风电场综合评价[J]. 电网技术, 2014, 38(10): 2741- 2746.
[11] 罗毅, 周创立, 等. 多层次灰色关联分析法在火电机组运行评价中的应用[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2012, 32(17): 97-102.
[12] 马丽, 张建华, 等. 城市配电网规划方案的多阶段综合评估方法[J]. 中国电力, 2013, 46(11): 150-154.
[13] 王奇, 常安, 等. 基于组合赋权的变权模糊输电设备状态评估方法[J]. 中国电力, 2015, 48(5): 21-25.
[14] 敖蕾蕾, 王慧芳, 等. 基于D-S证据理论的输变电设备状态检修多目标群决策[J]. 电网技术, 2014, 38(6): 1627-1633.
[15] 田凤调. 秩和比法及其应用[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 1993.
[16] 吴旭, 张建华. 基于状态检修的N-k故障在线辨识及路径搜索[J]. 电网技术, 2010, 34(2): 81-85.