基于三阶段DEA方法的我国A股16家上市银行十三五期间创新效率的研究
Research on the Innovation Efficiency of China’s A-Share 16 Listed Banks during the 13th Five-Year Plan Based on the Three-Stage DEA Method
DOI: 10.12677/FIN.2017.74025, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 1,753  浏览: 3,540  国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 吕喜明:内蒙古大学数学科学学院,内蒙古 呼和浩特;内蒙古财经大学统计与数学学院,内蒙古 呼和浩特;杨春雪, 杨 越, 谢 颖, 陈 瑞:内蒙古财经大学金融学院,内蒙古 呼和浩特
关键词: 商业银行三阶段DEA模型创新效率SFA回归Commercial Bank Three-Stage DEA Model Innovation Efficiency SFA Regression
摘要: 上个世纪,由于全球金融创新浪潮的兴起,以及计算机在金融创新方面的运用,商业银行的传统业务受到了巨大的冲击。进入21世纪,商业银行的传统存贷业务已经下滑60%。商业银行为了追求利益最大化,也开始重视对业务、技术、服务的创新。所以为了提升我国商业银行的创新水平,对我国商业银行的创新效率的研究显得尤为重要。我们以我国16家商业银行为主要研究对象从技术效率、纯技术效率、规模效率三个方面,通过运用传统DEA模型(CCR),得到三个方面初步的效率指标,之后通过SFA模型建立松弛变量,得到调整后的投入值,在通过第三阶段DEA处理方法,消除了环境因素和随机误差的影响,得到了同质化的创新指标,这对综合分析我国商业银行的创新效率提供了样本,通过对比分析这些数据,得出我国商业银行创新现在所面临的问题,通过扩大经营规模和产品创新等方法解决问题。
Abstract: In the last century, the rise of the global financial innovation tide and the use of computers in financial innovation have had a tremendous impact on the traditional business of commercial banks. In the 21st century, commercial banks’ traditional deposit and loan business have fallen by 60%. Commercial banks, in order to maximize the pursuit of interests, began to concentrate on business, technology, and service innovation. Therefore, in order to enhance the innovation level of China’s commercial banks, it is extremely important to study the innovation efficiency of commercial banks in China. We use the traditional DEA model (CCR) to get three initial efficiency indexes from the three aspects of technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency, and then use the SFA model to establish the relaxation variable, and the adjusted input value is obtained, which can be used to improve the innovation efficiency of China’s commercial banks by providing a sample of the innovation efficiency of China’s commercial banks, and then, through the third stage DEA treatment method, which eliminates the influence of environmental factors and random errors. By comparing these data, it is concluded that the innovation of our commercial banks is now facing the problem, and the problems are solved by enlarging the scale of operation and product innovation.
文章引用:吕喜明, 杨春雪, 杨越, 谢颖, 陈瑞. 基于三阶段DEA方法的我国A股16家上市银行十三五期间创新效率的研究[J]. 金融, 2017, 7(4): 245-255. https://doi.org/10.12677/FIN.2017.74025

参考文献

[1] Sathye, M. (2003) Efficiency of Banks in a Developing Economy: The Case of India. European Journal of Operational Research, 148, 662-671.
[2] Maudos, J. and Pastor, J.M. (2003) Cost and Profit Efficiency in the Spanish Banking Sector (1985-1996): A Non-Parametric Approach. Applied Financial Economics, 13, 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09603100110086087
[3] 赵旭, 周军民, 蒋振声. 国有商业银行效率的实证分析[J]. 经济科学, 2000, 16(6): 25-27.
[4] 张宗益, 吴俊. 银行效率研究中的前沿分析方法及其比较[J]. 经济学动态, 2003(4): 38-40.
[5] Fried, H.O., Lovell, C.A.K., Schmidt, S.S., et al. (2002) Accounting for Environmental Effects and Statistical Noise in Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 17, 157-174.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013548723393
[6] 康立, 邓斌. 基于三阶段DEA模型的我国国有商业银行效率研究[J]. 海南金融, 2012(9): 76-81.
[7] 吕喜明. 互联网金融冲击下的A股上市银行创新能力评价研究——基于面板数据广义DEA模型[J]. 会计与经济研究, 2016(5): 96-114.
[8] 吴晨. 我国上市商业银行效率测度及影响因素分析——基于DEA的实证分析[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2011(11): 47-54.
[9] 阮素梅, 甄欣. 我国城市商业银行创新效率测度与评价研究[J]. 江淮论坛, 2015(2): 39-45.
[10] 甄欣. 城市商业银行金融创新效率评价研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 蚌埠: 安徽财经大学, 2014.
[11] 丁俊. 对我国地方性商业银行效率的国内比较分析[J]. 金融论坛, 2001, 6(7): 19-22.
[12] 朱南, 卓贤, 董屹. 关于我国国有商业银行效率的实证分析与改革策略[J]. 管理世界, 2004(2): 18-26.
[13] 陈敬学. 我国商业银行规模经济问题的实证研究——基于随机前沿模型的分析[J]. 财贸研究, 2007, 18(3): 86-90.
[14] 郑录军, 曹廷求. 我国商业银行效率及其影响因素的实证分析[J]. 金融研究, 2005(1): 91-101.
[15] 黄送钦. 制度环境变迁与银行创新效率——来自中国上市银行的实验证据[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 合肥: 安徽大学, 2015.