“破坏性创造”:大卫•哈维的新自由主义观评析
“Creative Destruction”: A Critique of David Harvey’s View of Neoliberalism
DOI: 10.12677/ASS.2017.611192, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 1,515  浏览: 2,251 
作者: 袁思远:厦门大学,马克思主义学院,福建 厦门
关键词: 马克思主义逻辑批判新自由主义资本积累乌托邦金融危机Marxism Logical Criticism Neoliberalism Capital Accumulation Utopia International Financial Crisis
摘要: 大卫•哈维指出新自由主义实质上是一种意识形态工具,目的是为“滞胀”危机后重新恢复资本积累的条件、以及为夺回社会福利国家阶级妥协政策时期统治精英阶级失去的权力进行辩护和蒙蔽世人。哈维阐述了20世纪70年代以来新自由主义理论与实践重塑各国阶级力量对比格局以及世界政治–经济统治结构的历史过程,重点剖析新自由主义意识形态与美国垄断资产阶级权力的复辟、新自由主义“剥夺性积累”的表现形式、工人阶级对抗新自由主义可替代的选择。哈维的新自由主义观勾勒出当代资本主义的最新历史发展形态、基本特征、危机趋势以及世界社会主义运动复兴的新图景。但是,哈维用其新自由主义理论解释框架僵化地套用中国改革开放是其认识偏颇所在。
Abstract: David Harvey points out that the neoliberalism is essentially an ideological apparatus, which is aiming at restoring conditions of capital accumulation conditions after the “stagflation” crisis as well as defending for retaking the lost power which was once retained by meritocrats when social welfare states were in the period of class compromise policy and deceiving the public. Harvey has expounded the historical process of neoliberalism theory and practice reshaping the pattern of balance of class forces within countries and the world political-economic governance structure since the 1970s, and he has mainly analyzed the restoration of neoliberal ideology and U.S. monopoly capitalist class power, the manifestations of neoliberal accumulation by dispossession and the alternatives of the working class against the neoliberalism. Harvey's neoliberal conception outlines the contemporary capitalism latest historical development form, basic characteristics, trend of crisis and the new picture of the revival of world socialist movement; but there are some cognitive biases when it comes to China's reform and opening up applying mechanically its theoretical explanation framework.
文章引用:袁思远. “破坏性创造”:大卫•哈维的新自由主义观评析[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2017, 6(11): 1368-1373. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2017.611192

参考文献

[1] 吴宁, 冯琼, 冯旺舟. 大卫•哈维对新自由主义的批判及其启示[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2013, 27(2): 84-90.
[2] Harvey, D. (2007) Neoliberalism as Creative Destruction. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 610, 22-44.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716206296780
[3] Bush, G.W. (2002) Securing Freedoms Triumph. New York Times, 11September 2002.
[4] Williams, R. (1958) Culture and Society, 1780-1850. Chatto and Windus, London, 118.
[5] Juhasz, A. (2004) Ambitions of Empire: The Bush Administration Economic Plan for Iraq (and Beyond). Left Turn Magazine, 20 January 2004, 27-32.
[6] 大卫•哈维. 新自由主义简史[M]. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2010: 22.
[7] 戴海鹏, 王晓军. 当代垄断资本主义争论、实质及其历史地位[J]. 中国医药导报, 2009(9): 66-67.
[8] 李尚旗. 欧美发达国家工人利益表达的经验考察与启示——以农民工利益表达为研究视角[J]. 科学社会主义, 2010(3): 148-152.
[9] 何秉孟. 美国新自由主义模式: 通往灾难之路[J]. 理论导报, 2014(5): 66.
[10] 求实. 警惕“新自由主义”[J]. 商业文化, 2015(11): 39-48.
[11] 张凤超. 新马克思主义批判视阈下的空间命运[J]. 马克思主义研究, 2012 (1): 78-87.
[12] 蔡国栋. 当代新帝国主义本质剖析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2012.
[13] 彭飞. 大卫论“资本积累”与“剥夺性积累”的内在关系[J]. 铜陵学院学报, 2014, 13(1): 80-83.
[14] 大卫•哈维. 新自由主义和阶级力量的重建[M]//罗岗. 帝国、都市与现代性——知识分子论丛第4辑. 南京: 江苏人民出版社, 2006.