辽西低凸起中北段潜山油气藏泥岩盖层封闭能力评价
The Evaluation of the Sealing Ability of the Mudstone Cover in the North of the Liaoxi Low Uplift
DOI: 10.12677/OJNS.2017.55061, PDF, HTML, XML, 下载: 1,733  浏览: 3,693 
作者: 刘茂鹏, 胥 伟, 张志鹏：成都理工大学油气地质及开发工程国家重点实验室，四川 成都
关键词: 潜山油气藏；泥岩盖层；封闭能力；综合评价；辽西低凸起；Buried Hill Hydrocarbon Reservoir； Mudstone Cover； Sealing Capacity； Comprehensive Evaluation； Liaoxi Low Uplift
摘要: 为综合评价辽西低凸起泥岩盖层封闭能力，统计分析了辽西低凸起中北段潜山基础井资料，表明辽西低凸起潜山盖层主要由东营组和沙河街组泥岩盖层组成，其中以东营组泥岩盖层为区域性盖层，沙一段沙二段和沙三段泥岩盖层在JZ20-2、JZ25-1S潜山有分布，为局部盖层。选取泥质含量、突破压力、超压压力系数等参数研究微观特征，研究表明辽西低凸起潜山盖层主要存在泥岩毛细管压力封盖和超压封盖两种类型的微观机理，其中超压封盖主要分布在低凸起中北部JZ25-1S地区与JZ20-2地区。综合评价辽西低凸起中北段泥岩盖层封闭能力。结果表明：辽西低凸起中北段盖层以中等、好为主，好盖层分布较广。通过分析盖层与已发现油气藏关系，辽西低凸起中北段已发现油气分布在中等及以上盖层区域内，表明中等封盖能力的潜山盖层就能很好的封闭潜山油气。
Abstract: In order to comprehensively evaluate low bulge mudstone caprock sealing ability, the data of buried hill basic well in Liaoxi low uplift are statistically analyzed. It shows that Liaoxi low uplift buried hills cover layer is mainly composed of dongying group and the shahejie formation. Among them, mudstone caprock of Dongying formation is a regional cap rock. And Sha 1, Sha 2 and Sha 3 mudstone cover are distributed in the JZ20-2, JZ25-1s buried hill, which are partial cap rocks. The parameters of shale content, breakthrough pressure and overpressure pressure coefficient were selected to study the microscopic features. The results showed that there were mainly two types of micro-mechanisms: Mudstone capillary pressure cap and overpressure sealing system. Overpressure sealing system is mainly distributed in low rising in north-central JZ25-1s region and the JZ20-2. A comprehensive evaluation of the sealing ability of mudstone cover in the northern section of Liaoxi low uplift was made. The results showed that the top layer of the northern section of the low bulge in the Liaoxi low uplift was medium and good, and the distribution of the good cover was wide. By analyzing the relationship between cap rock and reservoir that had been found, and the oil and gas that had been found in the medium and above cover area, which showed that the buried caprocks with medium cap ability can well seal the buried hill oil and gas.
文章引用：刘茂鹏, 胥伟, 张志鹏. 辽西低凸起中北段潜山油气藏泥岩盖层封闭能力评价[J]. 自然科学, 2017, 5(5): 445-456. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJNS.2017.55061

参考文献

[1] 周雁, 金之钧, 朱东亚, 等. 油气盖层研究现状与认识进展[J]. 石油实验地质, 2012, 34(3): 234-245.
[2] 石鸿翠, 江晨曦, 孙美静, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部上古生界泥岩盖层封闭性能评价[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2015, 22(2): 9-16.
[3] 李潍莲, 刘震, 刘俊榜, 等. 辽东湾地区辽西低凸起油气田成藏地质条件的差异[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31(5): 664-670.
[4] 姜培海. 辽西低凸起油气成藏的主要控制因素及勘探潜力[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2001, 8(4): 24-27.
[5] 杨宝林, 叶加仁, 王子嵩, 等. 辽东湾断陷油气成藏模式及主控因素[J]. 地球科学(中国地质大学学报), 2014(10): 1507-1520.
[6] 姜雪, 徐长贵, 邹华耀, 等. 辽西低凸起与辽中凹陷油气成藏期次的异同[J]. 地球科学(中国地质大学学报), 2011, 36(3): 555-564.
[7] 陈建波, 潘玲黎, 童凯军, 等. 辽西低凸起太古宇变质岩潜山储层控制因素研究[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2016, 30(4): 30-35.
[8] 周东红, 李建平, 郭永华. 辽西低凸起及辽中凹陷压力场特征与油气分布关系[J]. 断块油气田, 2012, 19(1): 65- 69.
[9] 周心怀, 余一欣, 魏刚, 等. 渤海辽东湾海域JZ25-1S转换带与油气成藏的关系[J]. 石油学报, 2008, 29(6): 837-840.
[10] 吕丁友, 杨明慧, 周心怀, 等. 辽东湾坳陷辽西低凸起潜山构造特征与油气聚集[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2009, 30(4): 490-496.
[11] 朱峰, 高霞, 吕玉珍. 辽东湾地区古近系储层质量分析[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2009(2): 30-34.
[12] 王冰洁, 吴奎, 张如才, 等. 辽西凸起南部斜坡带泥岩盖层展布及封烃能力演化过程[J]. 地质科技情报, 2016(3): 159-166.
[13] 王祥, 王应斌, 吕修祥, 等. 渤海海域辽东湾坳陷油气成藏条件与分布规律[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2011(3): 342-351.
[14] 董平华, 黄新平. 综合阳离子钻井液体系在JZ25-1SA区块的研究及应用[J]. 天津科技, 2014(10): 42-45.
[15] 杨勇, 桑树勋, 陈世悦, 等. 渤海湾盆地石炭二叠系盖层及其沉积控制[J]. 中国煤田地质, 2007(6): 9-13.
[16] 李慧勇, 徐长贵, 刘廷海, 等. 陆相盆地薄层泥岩盖层形成机制、特征与油气成藏关系——以辽东湾地区中南部为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2010(1): 19-23.
[17] 张树林, 田世澄. 盖层的研究方法及其在油气勘探中的意义[J]. 地质科技情报, 1993(1): 73-78.
[18] 杨明慧, 周心怀, 魏刚, 等. 渤海湾盆地辽西低凸起传递斜坡构造特征与潜山油气聚集[J]. 现代地质, 2010(4): 749-754.
[19] 江尚昆, 吴昊明, 曾金昌, 等. 辽西低凸起中段潜山油气差异富集及主控因素[J]. 特种油气藏, 2016(6): 55-59.
[20] 李建民, 王树海. 贝尔凹陷布达特群潜山盖层封闭能力综合评价[J]. 大庆石油学院学报, 2006(3): 8-10.
[21] 付广, 陈章明, 吕延防, 等. 泥质岩盖层封盖性能综合评价方法探讨[J]. 石油实验地质, 1998(1): 80-86.
[22] 黄海平, 邓宏文. 泥岩盖层的封闭性能及其影响因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 1995(2): 20-26.
[23] 刘培, 于水明, 王福国, 等. 珠江口盆地恩平凹陷海相泥岩盖层有效性评价及应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017(3): 452-459.
[24] 付广, 姜振学, 庞雄奇. 盖层烃浓度封闭能力评价方法探讨[J]. 石油学报, 1997(1): 41-45.
[25] 邓津辉, 武强, 周心怀, 等. 渤海辽东湾海域JZ25油气藏成藏期次研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008(4): 537-540.
[26] 付广, 陈昕, 姜振学, 等. 烃浓度封闭及其在盖层封盖天然气中的重要作用[J]. 大庆石油学院学报, 1995(2): 23-27.
[27] Barth, J.A.C., Nowak, M.E., Zimmer, M., et al. (2015) Monitoring of Cap-Rock Integrity during CCS from Field Data at the Ketzin Pilot Site (Germany): Evidence from Gas Composition and Stable Carbon Isotopes. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 43, 133-140.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.10.017
[28] Lü, X., Wang, Y., Yu, H., et al. (2017) Major Factors Affecting the Closure of Marine Carbonate Caprock and Their Quantitative Evaluation: A Case Study of Ordovician Rocks on the Northern Slope of the Tazhong Uplift in the Tarim Basin, Western China. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 83, 231-245.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.03.006
[29] 侯连华, 刘泽容, 王京红. 盖层封闭能力的定量评价方法及其应用[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 1996(6): 1-4.
[30] 陈章明, 姜振学, 郭水生, 等. 泥质岩盖层封闭性综合评价及其在琼东南盆地的应用[J]. 中国海上油气地质, 1995(1): 1-6.
[31] 付广, 刘博, 吕延防. 泥岩盖层对各种相态天然气封闭能力综合评价方法[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(1): 21-26.
[32] 邓祖佑, 王少昌, 姜正龙, 等. 天然气封盖层的突破压力[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2000(2): 136-138.
[33] Downey, M.W. (1984) Evaluating Seals for Hydrocarbon Accumulations. AAPG Bulletin, 1752-1763.
[34] Jin, Z., Yuan, Y., Sun, D., et al. (2014) Models for Dynamic Evaluation of Mudstone Shale Cap Rocks and Their Applications in the Lower Paleozoic Sequences, Sichuan Basin, SW China. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 49, 121-128.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.10.001