作者:  

刘华山:广东省阳江市阳春第五中学

关键词:
霍尔效应惠更斯原理光程差空间决定时间时间流速c费马定理求导与积分时间脱离路程波动说粒动矢量运算法则the Hall effect; Huygens principlelight path difference; space determines the time; the time flow rate c; Fermat 's theorem; the derivative and the integral; time away from the distance; Wave theory; the classical logic vector algorithm

摘要:

折射现象是切向如实法向从变的光行事实,法向上的介质分化不对称是折射的具体原因,经典折射定律违背了这一基本事实,也违背了电磁学规律——霍尔效应。惠更斯证法主观地设想“从同一光源同时发出的两条平行光,将来必然齐头并进”,其思维基础是两列光线是同一光线,但光程差内蕴着“光波阵面不齐”的基因。惠更斯原理的内核“运动方向按时序推进”,或“宽松同时性原理”是主观臆断时间可以决定空间的结果,违背了“存在决定意识,空间决定时间,空间(距离)是衍生时间的依据,时间是回溯空间(距离)的结果”之基本科学原理。运动轨迹是动态平衡的空间点,“效应矩”或“作用矩”是空间而不是时间,通过定义时间流速c作为主观绝对连续标准,可以确定其余速率下的运动时间不与空间距离对等,时间不具有“刚性”,不能推动任何运动发生,由此可以判定以“运动方向按时序推进”为内核的惠更斯原理是根本错误的。 经典折射定律的费马证法利用了求导与积分充作可逆运算,非均匀连续时间加和运算,以及时间脱离路程的主观抽象处理等容错性手法谬证了经典折射定律,而经过辩证纠错以后,则自然导出继承了经典粒动矢量运算法则的一贯逻辑的新折射定律,最终否定经典折射定律及其“波动”解释。

The phenomenon of refraction is the fact that the tangential follow truth and the law follow the change,. The asymmetry of the medium in the law is the specific reason of the refraction. The law of classical refraction violates this basic fact and violates the law of electromagnetism - the Hall effect. Huygens' method of law subjectively envisions that "the two parallel lights emitted from the same light source must go hand in hand in the future". The basis of their thinking is that the two lines of light are the same light, but the light path difference implies that "the light wave front is out of alignment" Of the gene. Huygens principle of the core "movement direction according to the time to advance", or "loose simultaneity principle" is the outcome of subjective assumptions that the time can determine space, contrary to the basic fact that "the existence determines consciousness, space determines the time, space (distance) is the derivative time basis, time is the result of backspace (distance), ". The motion trajectory is the spatial point of the dynamic equilibrium, and it is impossible to be the time point of the dynamic equilibrium,, so the " Arm "is space rather than time. By defining the time flow rate c as the subjective absolute continuous criterion, it can be determined that the movement time at other rates is not equal to the spatial distance, the time is not "rigid", and it can not promote any motion, so it can be determined that the Huygens principle based on " the movement direction is advanced in time " is fundamentally wrong. By analyzing the translations of the classical refraction law with Fermat 's theorem, we can find that it makes use of the fault-tolerant method of the reversible operation of the derivative and the integral, and of subjective abstract processing to time away from the distance, wrongly proved the law of classical refraction. After the dialectical correction, The New refraction law inherit the classical logic vector algorithm, and deny it's Explanation of "wave theory",and a new refraction formula was established. Normal media differentiation Asymmetry is the specific cause of refraction, the density of the media is a state of existence, when they are compared together, the same distance is not necessarily the same time to complete, but this does not prevent the time Equality-based classical vector algorithm to play a role, and ultimately get " existence is just a certain movement" point of view, and a unified view on existence and the movement, inspired the "pre-movement" and the existence of similarity, which opened in the Non-homogeneous medium to establish the coordinate system when the coordinates of the origin of the pre-movement of the secret.

文章引用:
刘华山. 探讨折射定律的数理错误[J]. 汉斯预印本, 2017, 2(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.12677/HANSPrePrints.2017.21035

参考文献

[1] Ptolemy; Smith, A. Mark, Ptolemy's Theory of Visual Perception: An English Translation of the Optics, American Philosophical Society: pp. 42ff, 1996, ISBN 9780871698629
[2] Grattan-Guinness, Ivor, Companion Encyclopedia of the History and Philosophy of the Mathematical Sciences 1 reprint, illustrated, annotated, JHU Press: pp. 262–264, 2003, ISBN 9780801873966
[3] Hecht, Eugene, Optics 4th, United States of America: Addison Wesley: pp. 106–111, 127–129, 141, 2002, ISBN 0-8053-8566-5
[4] Bradley, J., An account of a new discovered motion of the fixed stars, Phil.Trans. Roy. Soc. 35, 637-661 (1728).
[5] Airy, G. B., On a supposed alteration in the amount of astronomical aberration of light, produced by the passage of the light through a considerable thickness of refracting medium, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) 20, 35-39 (1871).