石壕煤矿煤层气水力压裂微地震监测技术及应用
Microseismic Monitoring Technology and Application to Hydraulic Fracturing in Shihao Coal Mine
摘要:
论文以重庆市石壕煤矿煤层气水力压裂为依托,现场压裂7个孔,其中1#孔的稳定压力19.5 MPa,压入水量489 m3,压裂时间670 min,2#孔的稳定压力为21.8 MPa,压裂时间430 min,压入水量251 m3。基于微地震技术,现场监测了1#、2#孔水力压裂的微地震信号,通过分析,得到了水力压裂煤层破裂点的三维损伤定位,其损伤点主要集中在M6-3煤层,煤层顶板、底板未发生破裂,煤层破裂的方向性不明显,水力压裂1#增渗半径约90 m、2#增渗半径约110 m,平均影响半径约为100 m,此次试验结果,为石壕煤矿煤层气开采水力压裂钻孔优化布置、增渗效果提供参考。
Abstract:
This paper is based on hydraulic fracturing engineering for CBM in Chongqing Shihao coal mine, 7 holes were drilled for hydraulic fracturing on site, the stable pressure in 1# hole is 19.5 Mpa with 489 m3 injected water volume and 670 min fracturing time span; meanwhile the stable pressure in 2# hole is 21.8 Mpa with 251 m3 injected water volume and 430 min fracturing time span. The microseismic signals are monitored in 1#&2# holes on sites during hydraulic fracturing using microseismic monitoring technology. 3-D damage locations of failure points in coal bed are obtained through data analysis, the failure points are mostly happens in M6-3 coal bed, and there is no failure in both coal seam roof and floor; also the orientation of failure in coal seam is not obvious. The practice shows that anatonosis radii in 1# &2# hole is 90 m and 110 m, respectively; the mean influence radius is 100 m. This experiment results can provide a practical experience and technical support for drilling layout optimization and anatonosis in hydraulic fracturing for CBM exploitation.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
潘绍允, 王联, 程云才, 等. 水力压裂技术在无保护层低渗透率单一煤层增透中的应用[J]. 煤矿现代化, 2016(6): 14-15.
|
|
[2]
|
梁北援, 沈琛, 冷传波, 等. 微地震压裂监测技术研发进展[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2015(1): 6-10.
|
|
[3]
|
刘建中, 唐春华, 左建军. 微地震监测技术发展方向及应用[J]. 中国工程科学, 2013(10): 22-27.
|
|
[4]
|
孙明闯, 白新华. 煤储层水力压裂技术新进展[J]. 中国煤层气, 2013, 10(1): 31-34.
|
|
[5]
|
秦鸿刚. 寺河矿地面水力压裂裂缝扩展井地联合微震监测技术[J]. 煤炭技术, 2016(8): 132-134.
|
|
[6]
|
崔庆辉. 水力压裂微地震监测质量监控方法研究[J]. 天然气与石油, 2016, 34(5): 41-44, 49.
|
|
[7]
|
段银鹿, 李倩, 姚韦萍. 水力压裂微地震裂缝监测技术及其应用[J]. 断块油气田, 2013, 20(5): 644-648.
|