三维各向异性重力正演模型的高阶展开项评估
Evaluation on High-Degree Series Expansion of the 3-D Isotropic Forward Gravity Field Modelling
DOI: 10.12677/AG.2018.83054, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 肖翼忻, 霍学深:武汉大学测绘学院,武汉;申文斌*:武汉大学测绘学院,武汉;武汉大学测绘遥感国家重点实验室,武汉
关键词: 重力正演球谐分析地壳结构模型级数展开Forward Modelling Spectral Analysis Crustal Structure Series Expansion
摘要: 全球范围地表浅层质量分布的重力正演,在计算评估布格异常、地壳均衡补偿、超高精度地球重力场构建及地球内部结构反演时具有重要意义。本文在考虑质量分布的三维各向异性的重力正演方法的基础上,考察GEMMA地壳结构模型下各个大地构造分区的重力正演各阶结果对总体重力正演结果的贡献率。以仅考虑重力正演算法的误差因素的影响量级为0.1 mGal精度为判断准则,通过考察在空域下各个大地构造分区按照级数展开阶数的结果与总体重力正演的结果的差值,结果表明,其中地壳厚度较浅的大地构造分区(洋壳、大洋中脊)所需截断阶次为6阶,而地壳厚度较厚的大地构造分区(造山带、盆地、火成岩省、地盾、地台)所需截断阶次为12阶。
Abstract: The global gravity forward modelling of the shallow layer mass distribution is of vital importance in the computation of Bouguer anomaly, isostatic compensation and ultra-high resolution Earth’s gravity field. In this paper, based on the 3-D isotropic gravity forward modelling method, the contribution of each expansion power to the overall resultant forward modelling gravity in each geological province of GEMMA crustal model is further investigated. Consequently, based on the discrepancy of individual binominal expansion of each geological province and the overall resultant forward modelling gravity, for the accuracy criterion of 0.1 mGal, if considering only the influence of forward modelling method, the truncation degree/order of geological provinces with shallower crust is 6, while the one with thicker crust is supposed to truncate at 12th power.
文章引用:肖翼忻, 霍学深, 申文斌. 三维各向异性重力正演模型的高阶展开项评估[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2018, 8(3): 500-512. https://doi.org/10.12677/AG.2018.83054

参考文献

[1] Rapp, R.H. (1982) Degree Variances of the Earth’s Potential, Topography and Its Isostatic Compensation. Bulletin Géodésique, 56, 84-94.
[2] Rummel, R., et al. (1988) Comparisons of Global Topographic/Isostatic Models to the Earth’s Observed Gravity Field. Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio.
[3] Wieczorek, M.A. (2007) Gravity and Topography of the Terrestrial Planets. In: Treatise on Geophysics, 2nd Edition, Vol. 10, 153-193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Pavlis, N.K., et al. (2012) The Development and Evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008): The EGM2008 Earth Gravitational Model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 117, n/a-n/a.
[5] Jarvis, A., et al. (2008) Hole-filled SRTM for the Globe Version 4. Available from the CGIAR-CSI SRTM 90m Database. http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org
[6] Jakobsson, M., et al. (2012) The International Bathymetric Chart of the Arctic Ocean (IBCAO) Version 3.0. Geophysical Research Letters, 39, L12609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Hirt, C. and Rexer, M. (2015) Earth2014: 1 arc-min Shape, Topography, Bedrock and Ice-Sheet Models—Available as Gridded Data and Degree-10,800 Spherical Harmonics. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 39, 103-112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Kuhn, M. and Seitz, K. (2005) Comparison of Newton’s Integral in the Space and Frequency Domains. In: A Window on the Future of Geodesy, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 386-391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Grombein, T., et al. (2014) A Wavelet-Based Assessment of Topographic-Isostatic Reductions for GOCE Gravity Gradients. Surveys in Geophysics, 35, 959-982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Heck, B. and Seitz, K. (2007) A Comparison of the Tesseroid, Prism and Point-Mass Approaches for Mass Reductions in Gravity Field Modelling. Journal of Geodesy, 81, 121-136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Tsoulis, D., Novák, P. and Kadlec, M. (2009) Evaluation of Precise Terrain Effects Using High-Resolution Digital Elevation Models. Journal of Geophysical Research, 114, B02404.
[12] Grombein, T., Seitz, K. and Heck, B. (2013) Optimized Formulas for the Gravitational Field of a Tesseroid. Journal of Geodesy, 87, 645-660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Deng, X.-L., et al. (2016) Corrections to “A Comparison of the Tesseroid, Prism and Point-Mass Approaches for Mass Reductions in Gravity Field Modelling” (Heck and Seitz, 2007) and “Optimized Formulas for the Gravitational Field of a Tesseroid” (Grombein et al., 2013). Journal of Geodesy, 90, 585-587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Nagy, D., Papp, G. and Benedek, J. (2000) The Gravitational Potential and Its Derivatives for the Prism. Journal of Geodesy, 74, 552-560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Nagy, D., Papp, G. and Benedek, J. (2002) Corrections to “The Gravitational Potential and Its Derivatives for the Prism”. Journal of Geodesy, 76, 475-475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Shen, W. and Han, J. (2013) Improved Geoid Determination Based on the Shallow-Layer Method: A Case Study Using EGM08 and CRUST2.0 in the Xinjiang and Tibetan Regions. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 24, 591.
[17] Shen, W.-B. and Deng, X.-L. (2016) Evaluation of the Fourth-Order Tesseroid Formula and New Combination Approach to Precisely Determine Gravitational Potential. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 60, 583-607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Deng, X.-L. and Shen, W.-B. (2017) Evaluation of Gravitational Curvatures of a Tesseroid in Spherical Integral Kernels. Journal of Geodesy, 92, 415-429.
[19] Lachapelle, G. (1976) A Spherical Harmonic Expansion of the Isostatic Reduction Potential. Bollettino di Geodesia e Scienze Affini, 35, 281-299.
[20] Grombein, T., Seitz, K. and Heck, B. (2016) The Rock-Water-Ice Topographic Gravity Field Model RWI TOPO 2015 and Its Comparison to a Conventional Rock-Equivalent Version. Surveys in Geophysics, 37, 937-976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Pavlis, N.K. and Rapp, R.H. (1990) The Development of an Isostatic Gravitational Model to Degree 360 and Its Use in Global Gravity Modelling. Geophysical Journal International, 100, 369-378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Tenzer, R., et al. (2010) The Spherical Harmonic Representation of the Gravitational Field Quantities Generated by the Ice Density Contrast. Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy, 40, 207-223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Tenzer, R., et al. (2015) Analysis of the Refined CRUST1.0 Crustal Model and Its Gravity Field. Surveys in Geophysics, 36, 139-165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Root, B.C., et al. (2016) On a Spectral Method for Forward Gravity Field Modelling. Journal of Geodynamics, 97, 22-30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Balmino, G., et al. (2012) Spherical Harmonic Modelling to Ultra-High Degree of Bouguer and Isostatic Anomalies. Journal of Geodesy, 86, 499-520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Rexer, M., et al. (2016) Layer-Based Modelling of the Earth’s Gravitational Potential up to 10-km Scale in Spherical Harmonics in Spherical and Ellipsoidal Approximation. Surveys in Geophysics, 37, 1035-1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Hirt, C. and Kuhn, M. (2012) Evaluation of High-Degree Series Expansions of the Topographic Potential to Higher-Order Powers: Topopotential to Higher-Order Powers. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 117.
[28] Claessens, S.J. and Hirt, C. (2013) Ellipsoidal Topographic Potential: New Solutions for Spectral forward Gravity Modeling of Topography with Respect to a Reference Ellipsoid. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 118, 2013JB010457.
[29] Dziewonski, A.M. and Anderson, D.L. (1981) Preliminary Reference Earth Model. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 25, 297-356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] Reguzzoni, M. and Sampietro, D. (2015) GEMMA: An Earth Crustal Model Based on GOCE Satellite Data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation Part A, 35, 31-43.
[31] Gladczenko, T.P., Coffin, M.F. and Eldholm, O. (1997) Crustal Structure of the Ontong Java Plateau: Modeling of New Gravity and Existing Seismic Data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 102, 22711-22729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Heiskanen, W.A. and Moritz, H. (1967) Physical Geodesy. Bulletin Géodésique (1946-1975), 86, 491-492.
[33] Novák, P. and Grafarend, E.W. (2006) The Effect of Topographical and Atmospheric Masses on Spaceborne Gravimetric and Gradiometric Data. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 50, 549-582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[34] Tenzer, R., Pavel, N. and Vladislav, G. (2012) The Bathymetric Stripping Corrections to Gravity Field Quantities for a Depth-Dependent Model of Seawater Density. Marine Geodesy, 35, 198-220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[35] Tenzer, R., Hamayun, K. and Vajda, P. (2009) Global Maps of the CRUST 2.0 Crustal Components Stripped Gravity Disturbances. Journal of Geophysical Research, 114, B05408.