“一带一路”战略与企业绩效—关系与机制研究
“One Belt and One Road” Strategy and Corporate Performance—A Study on the Relationship and Mechanism
摘要: “一带一路”作为中国新的国际战略框架,为中国经济带来了多重发展机遇。该战略对中国及沿线国家的宏观经济效应已受到了学者广泛的关注,然而鲜有研究从微观层面探讨“一带一路”战略的影响。本文以2013~2016年“一带一路”概念股上市公司为实验组样本,采用倾向得分匹配倍差法(PSM-DID)探讨了“一带一路”战略对于微观经济主体绩效的影响以及两者间的内在影响机制。研究结果表明:“一带一路”战略背景下企业的绩效得到改善,其中投资水平在“一带一路”战略与企业绩效之间起到完全中介作用,即“一带一路”驱动了企业投资,投资又提升了企业效益。本文的研究结论有利于从微观层面上深化对“一带一路”战略效果的解读,也为“一带一路”战略背景下政府推动实体经济增长、企业提高绩效水平提供了参考依据。
Abstract: As a new international strategic framework, “One Belt and One Road” strategy has brought multiple development opportunities to Chinese economy. The “One Belt and One Road” strategy has received extensive attention from scholars on the macro-economic effects of China and countries along the routes, but few studies have explored the impact of “One Belt and One Road” strategy from the micro level. Therefore, this article adopted difference-in-difference approach based on the propensity score matching (PSM-DID) to discuss the influence of “One Belt and One Road” strategy on the performance of micro economic subjects and the internal influence mechanism between them. The results show that the “One Belt and One Road” strategy has a significant positive effect on the performance of enterprises, and the investment level plays a complete intermediary role between “One Belt and One Road” strategy and enterprise performance. This paper is helpful to deepen the understanding of the effect of the “One Belt and One Road” strategy from micro level. At the same time, this paper also gives corresponding suggestions for policy makers and enterprises.
文章引用:刘琦, 南晓莉. “一带一路”战略与企业绩效—关系与机制研究[J]. 金融, 2018, 8(4): 179-189. https://doi.org/10.12677/FIN.2018.84021

参考文献

[1] 宗良. “一带一路”与人民币国际化协同效应研究[J]. 国际金融, 2017(3): 6-9.
[2] Vernon, R. (1966) International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 190-207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Dunning, J.H. (1981) International Production and the Multinational Enterprise. George Allen and Unwin, Crows Nest..
[4] Lall, S. (1983) The New Multinationals: The Spread of Third World Enterprises. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
[5] 冼国明, 杨锐. 技术累积、竞争策略与发展中国家对外直接投资[J]. 经济研究, 1998(11): 57-64.
[6] 章海源, 王海燕. 我国对外直接投资战略选择——对外直接投资公司调查问卷分析报告[J]. 国际贸易, 2006(7): 50-56.
[7] 刘阳春. 中国企业对外直接投资动因理论与实证研究[J]. 中山大学学报(社会科学版), 2008, 48(3): 177-184 + 209-210.
[8] 温湖炜. 中国企业对外直接投资能缓解产能过剩吗——基于中国工业企业数据库的实证研究[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2017(4): 107-117.
[9] Buckley, P.J. (2004) Asian Network Firms: An Analytical Framework. Asia Pacific Business Review, 10, 254-271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 裴长洪, 樊瑛. 中国企业对外直接投资的国家特定优势[J]. 中国工业经济, 2010(7): 45-54.
[11] Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., et al. (2005) Competition and Innovation:An Inverted-U Relationship. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 701-728.
[12] Rothewell, R. and Dodgson, M. (1992) European Technology Policy Evolution: Convergence towards SME and Regional Technology Transfer. Technovation, 12, 223-238.
[13] 程华, 王婉君. 创新政策与企业绩效研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2013, 1(2): 10-14.
[14] 肖兴志, 王伊攀. 政府补贴与企业社会资本投资决策——来自战略性新兴产业的经验证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2014(9): 148-160.
[15] 熊艾伦, 蒲勇健, 张勇. “一带一路”与过剩产能转移[J]. 求索, 2015(12): 75-79.
[16] 邵敏, 包群. 政府补贴与企业生产率——基于我国工业企业的经验分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2012(7): 70-82.
[17] 陈丽丽. 国际投资模式与中国“走出去”企业绩效异质性: 基于KS检验及分位数估计[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2015(7): 118-127.
[18] 陈高, 胡迎东. “一带一路”战略对沿线国家贸易影响的实证分析[J]. 统计与决策, 2017(23): 145-149.
[19] Rosenbaum, P.R. and Rubin, D.B. (1985) Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Me-thods That Incorporate the Propensity Score. American Statistician, 39, 33-38.
[20] 刘敏, 冯丽娟. 高管内部薪酬差距、投资行为与企业绩效——以中国制造业A股上市企业为例[J]. 科学决策, 2015(10): 66-81.
[21] Abadie, A., Drukker, D., Herr, J.L. and Imbens, G.W. (2004) Implementing Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects in Stata. Stata Journal, 3, 290-311.
[22] 曹献飞. 政府补贴与企业研发投资——基于倾向评分匹配倍差法的经验研究[J]. 经济问题探索, 2014(9): 160-166.