高砷燃煤燃烧飞灰中砷粒径分布及健康风险评价
The Distribution of Arsenic Particle Size Distribution and Health Risk Assessment of High Arsenic Coal Combustion Fly Ash
DOI: 10.12677/AEP.2018.86060, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 高 燕, 王正强*, 胥建霞:贵州省流通环节食品安全检验中心,贵州 贵阳;贵州省分析测试研究院,贵州 贵阳;舒海霞, 宋春然, 谭 红, 何锦林:贵州省分析测试研究院,贵州 贵阳
关键词: 高砷燃煤飞灰粒径分布健康风险High Arsenic Coal Fly Ash Arsenic Particle Size Distribution Health Risks
摘要: 贵州省黔西南地区因使用高砷燃煤带来地方性砷中毒。近年来,对于地方性砷中毒的机制及健康风险研究已成为关注的热点。本文模拟高砷燃煤燃烧时产生的飞灰中砷的粒径分布及对人体致癌的风险。将高砷燃煤在扩散炉中进行燃烧,燃烧温度为600℃~1000℃,生成的飞灰粒径采用Andersen分级采样器进行采样,共分为8级(1.2~42.6 μm)。实验表明:飞灰中砷的含量随粒径的减小而增大。尤其是当燃煤飞灰粒径<10.7μm时,这种变化更为明显。飞灰中砷含量最小值为2280μg/g,最大值达到5812μg/g。粒径在3.4~16.3μm之间的飞灰质量占总飞灰质量的60.27%,其中砷的质量占飞灰中砷的总质量的61.3%,峰值出现在第五级(5.4~107μm),为23.86%左右,呈单峰态分布。对飞灰中As的含量应用USEPA的方法,开展健康风险评价,结果表明,As通过皮肤接触和吸入这两种暴露途径进入人体的日均暴露量分别为ADDinh = 2566.1 mg/(kg∙d)和ADDdrem = 85.42 mg/(kg∙d),存在严重致癌的风险。高砷燃煤飞灰中的As暴露于人体的健康风险评价鲜有报道,故本文的研究为定量描述流行病学提供依据。
Abstract: Local arsenic poisoning has been caused by high arsenic coal burning in the southwest of Guizhou province. In recent years, the research on the mechanism and health risk of endemic arsenic poisoning has become a hot topic. In this paper, analysis of the particle size distribution of arsenic is simulated in fly ash then the carcinogenic risk is calculated. High arsenic coal burned in diffusion furnace at the temperature between 600˚C and 1000˚C, and the fly ash particle size was sample classified using Andersen sampler, which is divided into 8 classes (1.2~42.6 microns). The experimental results show that the content of arsenic increases with the decrease of particle size. Especially when coal fly ash particle size <10.7μm, it showed more obvious change. The minimum value of arsenic content in the fly ash is of 2280μg/g, and a maximum of 5812μg/g. More than 60.27% of the total mass of fly ash showed particle size between 3.4~16.3μm, and 61.3% of the total mass peak appears in the fifth class (5.4~107μm), which accounts for 23.86%, is unimodal distribution. Health risk of fly ash was evaluated using the method of EPA, and daily exposure amount in two kinds of exposure path ways is calculated (inhalation and dermal exposure) ADDinh = 2566.1 mg/(kg∙d) and ADDdrem = 85.42 mg/(kg∙d), which showed a serious risk of cancer. The study in this paper provides a basis for quantitative description of epidemiology of arsenic while the As exposure assessment to human health is rarely reported.2280 mg/gµµ
文章引用:高燕, 王正强, 胥建霞, 舒海霞, 宋春然, 谭红, 何锦林. 高砷燃煤燃烧飞灰中砷粒径分布及健康风险评价[J]. 环境保护前沿, 2018, 8(6): 482-491. https://doi.org/10.12677/AEP.2018.86060

参考文献

[1] 安冬, 何光煜, 胡小强. 室内燃用高砷煤引起的地方性砷中毒[J]. 中国地方病学杂志, 1994, 13(4): 245-247.
[2] 罗挺, 魏羽佳, 凌淑清, 等. 地方性砷中毒初步报告[J]. 贵州医药, 1993, 17(6): 371-372.
[3] 郑宝山, 龙江平, 周代兴, 等. 贵州高砷煤所致地方性砷中毒[J]. 内蒙古地方病防治研究, 1994, 19(增刊): 41.
[4] 周代兴, 等. 高砷煤污染引起慢性砷中毒的调查[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 1993, 27(3): 147-150.
[5] 周运书, 周代兴, 朱绍廉, 等. 一起燃煤所致人群慢性砷中毒的调查[J]. 中国公共卫生, 1994, 10(1): 41.
[6] 丁振华, 等. 黔西南高砷煤中砷存在形式的初步研究[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 1999, 29(5): 421-425.
[7] 世界卫生组织(WTO). 砷的环境卫生标准(中文版) [S]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 1985: 118-141.
[8] 周运书, 程明亮, 吴君, 等. 贵州与陕西省燃煤型砷中毒的比较分析[J]. 中国地方病学杂志, 2007(6), 679-681.
[9] 陈军, 范寿波, 王锦成. 我国工业锅炉污染存在的问题及治理对策[J]. 中国环境管理, 2003, 22(2): 26-27.
[10] 陈星, 马建华, 李新宁, 等. 基于棕地的居民小区土壤重金属健康风险评价[J]. 环境科学, 2014, 35(3): 1068-1074.
[11] US EPA (1989) Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, vol. I: Human Health Evaluation Manual. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.
http://www.docin.com/p-549363036.html
[12] 常静, 刘敏, 李先华, 等. 上海地表灰尘重金属污染的健康风险评价[J]. 中国环境科学, 2009, 29(5): 548-554.
[13] 谷蕾, 仝致琦, 宋博, 等. 基于不同通车时间的路旁土壤重金属健康风险:以连霍高速公路郑州-商丘段为例[J]. 环境科学研究, 2009, 22(2): 241-247.
[14] 施烈焰, 曹云者, 张景来, 等. RBCA和CLEA模型在某重金属污染场地环境风险评价中的应用比较[J]. 环境科学研究, 2009, 22(2): 241-247.
[15] Ferreira, B.L. and De Miguel, E. (2005) Geochemistry and Risk Assessment of Street Dust in Luanda, Angola: A Tropical Urban Environment. Atmospheric Environment, 39, 4501-4512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Lim, H.S., Lee, J.S., Chou, H.T., et al. (2008) Heavy Metal Contamination and Health Risk Assessment in the Vicinity of the Abandoned Songcheon Au-Ag Mine in Korea. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 96, 223-230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 刘庆, 王静, 史衍玺, 等. 基于GIS的县城土壤重金属健康风险评价——以浙江省慈溪市为例[J]. 土壤通报, 2008, 39(3): 634-639.
[18] 黄廷磊, 郑刚, 王乃宁. 气溶胶中微小颗粒状污染物检测技术[J]. 中国粉体技术, 2001, 7(2): 38-40.
[19] Malykh, N.V. and Pertsikov, I.Z. (1990) Study of the Partitioning of Trace Elements during Pulverized Coal Combustion. Khimiya Tverdogo Tela, 24, 50.
[20] Rizeq, R.G., Hansell, D.W. and Seeker, W.R. (1994) Pre-dictions of Metal Emissions and Partitioning in Coal-Fired Combustion Systems. Fuel Processing Technology, 39, 219-236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 王荟, 等. 南京市城区气溶胶粒度分布特征[J]. 江苏环境科技, 2002, 15(3): 4-5.
[22] 魏羽佳, 等. 燃用高砷煤引起慢性砷中毒的调查[J]. 贵阳医学院学报, 1997, 22(1): 23-25.
[23] 李文珍, 杨洪莉. 浅谈砷污染[J]. 环境保护科学, 1995, 23(3): 57, 67, 80.