不同时空尺度下新安江模型参数敏感性分析
Parameters Sensitivity Analysis of the Xin’anjiang Model under Different Temporal and Spatial Scales
DOI: 10.12677/JWRR.2018.76061, PDF,  被引量    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 盛 晟, 陈 华, 林康聆, 许崇育, 郭生练:武汉大学水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉
关键词: 新安江模型参数敏感性时空尺度降雨径流Xin’anjiang Model Parameter Sensitivity Space-Time Scale Rainfall Runoff
摘要: 流域水文过程在不同时空下表现出不同的规律和特征,使得对水文过程进行概化描述的水文模型也具有明显的时空不均匀性。以福建闽江建溪流域为研究对象,在不同时间尺度和空间尺度下应用新安江模型,应用基于Monte Carlo法和Sobol敏感性分析法,比较研究参数的敏感性及变化规律。结果表明:新安江模型的模拟精度随时间尺度增大先增高后降低;通过定性和定量分析确定的敏感参数主要有KE、KI、CI、CG、N和NK,参数敏感性随时空尺度改变而规律变化;随着时间尺度的增大,KE、KG和CI的敏感度降低,N和CG的敏感度增强;随着空间尺度的增大,CG敏感度降低,时间尺度的改变对KE、CG的敏感度影响减弱。
Abstract: The hydrological process shows different laws and characteristics in different time and space, contri-buting to hydrological models which generalize hydrological processes also having obvious spatial and temporal heterogeneity. The Xin’anjiang model was applied for runoff simulation at different time and spatial scales at the Jianxi in Fujian Province. In the basin, the sensitivity and variation were studied and compared based on Monte Carlo and Sobol sensitivity analysis methods respectively. The results show that the simulation accuracy of the Xin’anjiang model increases first and then decreases with time scale. The sensitive parameters determined by qualitative and quantitative analysis mainly include KE, KI, CI, CG, N and NK. The parameter sensitivity changes with time and space scale and changes regularly. With the increase of time scale, the sensitivity of KE, KG and CI decreases, and the sensitivity of N and CG increases. With the increase of spatial scale, the sensitivity of CG decreases, and the change in time scale has a weaker effect on the sensitivity of KE and CG.
文章引用:盛晟, 陈华, 林康聆, 许崇育, 郭生练. 不同时空尺度下新安江模型参数敏感性分析[J]. 水资源研究, 2018, 7(6): 541-550. https://doi.org/10.12677/JWRR.2018.76061

参考文献

[1] 于翠松. 水文尺度研究进展与展望[J]. 水电能源科学, 2006, 24(6): 17-19. YU Cuisong. Progress and prospects of hydrological scale research. Hydroelectric Energy Science, 2006, 24(6): 17-19. (in Chinese)
[2] 朱吉生, 黄诗峰, 等. 水文模型尺度问题的若干探讨[J]. 人民黄河, 2015, 5(37): 31-37. ZHU Jisheng, HUANG Shifeng, et al. Discussion on the scale problem of hydrological model. People’s Yellow River, 2015, 5(37): 31-37. (in Chinese)
[3] 戚晓明, 陆桂华, 金君良. 水文尺度与水文模拟关系研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2006(11): 28-31. QI Xiaoming, LU Guihua and JIN Junliang. Research on the relationship between hydrological scale and hydrological simulation. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2006(11): 28-31. (in Chinese)
[4] 田雨, 雷晓辉, 蒋云钟, 等. 水文模型参数敏感性分析方法研究评述[J]. 水文, 2010, 30(4): 9-12. TIAN Yu, LEI Xiaohui, JIANG Yunzhong, et al. Review on the sensitivity analysis method of hydrological model parameters. Hydrology, 2010, 30(4): 9-12. (in Chinese)
[5] 宋晓猛, 孔凡哲, 占车生, 等. 基于统计理论方法的水文模型参数敏感性分析[J]. 水科学进展, 2012, 23(5): 642-649. SONG Xiaomeng, KONG Fanzhe, ZHAN Chesheng, et al. Sensitivity analysis of hydrological model parameters based on statistical theory method. Advances in Water Science, 2012, 23(5): 642-649. (in Chinese)
[6] MCKAY, M. D., BECKMAN, R. J. and CONOVER, W. J. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics, 2000, 21(2): 239-245.
[7] 罗智锋, 王文, 陈喜. 流域分布式水文模拟中的模型网格尺度效应[J]. 三峡大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 35(2): 6-11. LUO Zhifeng, WANG Wen and CHEN Xi. Model grid scale effect in basin hydrological simulation. Journal of China Three Gorges University (Natural Sciences), 2013, 35(2): 6-11. (in Chinese)
[8] 常晓栋, 徐宗学, 赵刚, 李怀民. 基于Sobol方法的SWMM模型参数敏感性分析[J]. 水力发电学报, 2018, 37(3): 59-68. CHANG Xiaodong, XU Zongxue, ZHAO Gang and LI Huaimin. Sensitivity analysis of SWMM model parameters based on sobol method. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2018, 37(3): 59-68. (in Chinese)
[9] 齐伟, 张弛, 初京刚, 周惠成. Sobol’方法分析TOPMODEL水文模型参数敏感性[J]. 水文, 2014, 34(2): 49-54. QI Wei, ZHANG Chi, CHU Jingang and ZHOU Huicheng. Sobol’ method for analyzing parameter sensitivity of TOPMODEL hydrological model. Hydrology, 2014, 34(2): 49-54. (in Chinese)
[10] ZHAO, R. J. The Xinanjiang model applied in China. Journal of Hydrology, 1992, 135(1-4): 371-381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] DUAN, Q., SOROOSHIAN, S. and GUPTA, V. K. Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models. Journal of Hydrology, 1994, 158(3-4): 265-284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] SOBOL, I. M. Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., 2001.
[13] ZHANG, C., CHU, J. and FU, G. Sobol’s sensitivity analysis for a distributed hydrological model of Yichun River Basin, China. Journal of Hydrology, 2013, 480(480): 58-68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] TANG, Y., REED, P., WAGENER, T., et al. Comparing sensitivity analysis methods to advance lumped watershed model identification and evaluation. Hydrology & Earth System Sciences, 2007, 3(6): 793-817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef